Koch network endorses Amendment 11 for 'fairer' property rights - Florida Politics

Koch network endorses Amendment 11 for ‘fairer’ property rights

Two Koch network advocacy groups came out Wednesday in support of proposed Amendment 11 to the Florida Constitution, which would ease restrictions on noncitizen ownership of property and promote criminal sentencing reform.

The LIBRE Initiative, which seeks to “empower” Hispanics via the free-enterprise system, and Freedom Partners — “dedicated to protecting freedom and expanding opportunity for every American,” according to its website — issued written statements endorsing the measure.

LIBRE focused on language eliminating the Legislature’s authority to bar “aliens ineligible for citizenship” from owning, inheriting, buying, or selling property.

“A key value of our nation is the belief that individuals — regardless of background — have the right to own their personal property without the fear that government can take it from them without just cause,” LIBRE President Daniel Garza said.

“This is why we strongly support Amendment 11, which would eliminate the power of government to unconditionally take the property of noncitizens in Florida. This is an antiquated provision that hasn’t been applied for more than a century. Voters should protect rights by supporting Amendment 11.”

Freedom Partners, meanwhile, addressed language clarifying the Legislature’s authority to apply criminal sentencing reforms retroactively.

FMA_stpeter_blog_305ad728x90

The two matters are bundled into the single proposed amendment, along with a third proposal to eliminate a constitutional mandate to build a high-speed rail system.

“We strongly endorse Amendment 11 because it protects public safety and makes Florida’s criminal justice policies fairer and more just,” chairman Mark Holden said.

“By guaranteeing that alleged crimes are prosecuted under the most current laws on the books, Amendment 11 makes punishments more proportional and ensures that people aren’t sentenced under failed policies that have been deemed outdated.”

He added that the “smart-on-crime reform will help reduce crime and prison populations in the Sunshine State and will give many Floridians a much-needed second chance.”

According to the news release, “alien land laws” cropped up early in the 20th century, “largely out of fear of the Japanese.” Florida voters approved the restriction in 1926, but the Legislature hasn’t been enforcing it.

As for the sentencing language, it would allow the Legislature to apply reductions for nonviolent drug offenders approved 2014 to offenders already serving their sentences under older, more draconian policies.

The U.S. Sentencing Commission earlier this year found “no difference between the recidivism rates for offenders who were released early due to retroactive application of the FSA Guideline Amendment and offenders who had served their full sentences before the FSA Guideline Amendment reduction retroactively took effect.”

FSA stands for the federal Fair Sentencing Act

Amendment 11, alongside Amendment 7 and Amendment 9, faced criticism — and a legal challenge by retired Supreme Court Justice Harry Lee Anstead — for bundling multiple provisions into a single proposal. In a 4-3 decision handed down last week, the Florida Supreme Court okayed the bundled amendments.

Amendment 11 was placed on the ballot by the Constitution Revision Commission and is one of a dozen proposals that will be on the Nov. 6 general election ballot. The ballot description reads as follows: “Removes discriminatory language related to real property rights. Removes obsolete language repealed by voters. Deletes provision that amendment of a criminal statute will not affect prosecution or penalties for a crime committed before the amendment; retains current provision allowing prosecution of a crime committed before the repeal of a criminal statute.”

Constitutional amendments must earn no less than 60 percent support from voters in order to pass.

1 Comment

  1. This is a total disgrace to our Constitution! Nothing should be bundled!! It is very confusing to most voters and I think that is the plan! You must agree to vote yess on all amendments or no on all!
    , what if you don’t want yes on each thing but choose no on some! Should be fixed immediately! Shame on you Florida! I’m a red blood Republican and will vote red on nov 6th…but very disappointed in our republicans who came up with bundling! I’ve been told republicans were the only ones on the committee …if not…please accept my apologies! This should have been fixed before mid terms!!!

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons