Florida Supreme Court could put Hillsborough nonpartisan races back in play

Partisan politics of the democrats and republicans are creating a lack of bipartisan consensus. In American politics US parties are represented by either the democrat donkey or republican elephant

Removing party affiliation from several Hillsborough County elected positions might still be in play after a Florida Supreme Court decision upends what was once thought to be a done deal.

Late in June, Hillsborough County Commissioners voted 5-2 to hold a referendum asking voters whether candidates for constitutional offices like Sheriff and Property appraiser should be non-partisan, meaning their registered party affiliation would not appear on ballots.

Democrats shot back a month later, challenging the commission’s decision by saying it was a GOP attempt to maintain control in an increasingly blue county. The initial commission vote was split along party lines with all five of the board’s Republicans voting in favor of the move. The board’s two Democrats voted against it.

In August, a judge upheld the Democratic challenge basing his decision on the precedent set in Orange County. That county’s Sheriff, Tax Collector and Property Appraiser sued to restore their right to run including party affiliation. They won. Case closed.

But now the question is back in play after the Florida Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s initial ruling.

That means there’s no longer a reason for Hillsborough County to block a referendum seeking to remove party affiliation from elected constitutional offices.

What’s not clear is if it will matter.

Asked whether the Supreme Court ruling will force the already approved ballot measure onto a future ballot, the Hillsborough County Attorney’s office didn’t have an immediate answer. Attorneys there are seeking clarification on what the ruling means for Hillsborough’s previous vote.

There are several things to consider. First, an earlier commission had decided to place the question before voters. It’s unclear whether a new vote would be required to revisit the issue.

If the board does have to take a fresh vote, it’s unlikely they’d find success again. The new board is now a 4-3 Democratic majority, as opposed to the previous 5-2 Republican majority.

It’s also possible that the Supreme Court decision could mean the measure goes straight onto the ballot without a vote.

And even if that happens, it’s not clear when the referendum would go before voters. The next election is in March, but that’s the Tampa municipal election, meaning the matter could have to wait until 2020.

The Hillsborough County Attorney’s office expects to have more answers next week after they review the implications of the Supreme Court ruling.

Janelle Irwin Taylor

Janelle Irwin Taylor has been a professional journalist covering local news and politics in Tampa Bay since 2003. Most recently, Janelle reported for the Tampa Bay Business Journal. She formerly served as senior reporter for WMNF News. Janelle has a lust for politics and policy. When she’s not bringing you the day’s news, you might find Janelle enjoying nature with her husband, children and two dogs. You can reach Janelle at [email protected]



#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Daniel Figueroa, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Joe Henderson, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Mike Wright, and Tristan Wood.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories