Conservative Koch network disavows critical race theory bans
Image via AP.

Charles Koch
Charles Koch Foundation exec called GOP ban drive a gag on free expression.

As conservative political groups mobilize to ban in schools what they call critical race theory, one prominent backer of Republican causes and candidates is notably absent.

Leaders in the network built by the billionaire Koch family say they oppose government bans and efforts to recall school board members over teaching about race and history in schools. While they note they don’t agree with the ideas at the center of the fight, they argue the government bans, now enacted in 11 states, stifle debate essential to democracy.

“Using government to ban ideas, even those we disagree with, is also counter to core American principles — the principles that help drive social progress,” said Evan Feinberg, executive director of the Koch-affiliated Stand Together Foundation.

That position is in line with the network’s long-held libertarian streak. But it has sparked fresh charges of hypocrisy from the megadonor’s critics. After spending years pouring money into conservative groups, the Koch groups cannot distance themselves from the movement it helped build, they argue.

“They have this nice position they want to tout from a P.R. standpoint. But their money has gone to these groups that have the opposite effect on that agenda,” said Lisa Graves, board president for the liberal watchdog group Center for Media and Democracy.

The Koch organization first went public with its position last spring, as state lawmakers and conservative groups began passing legislation that bans from classrooms specific concepts, including the idea that racism is systemic in society and the U.S. legal system.

The efforts were prompted in part by backlash to The 1619 Project, a New York Times Magazine initiative aimed at rethinking the role of slavery in the nation’s history and development.

In a letter published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May, Charlie Ruger, the Charles Koch Foundation’s vice president of philanthropy, described Republicans’ push to ban these concepts from schools as a gag on free expression.

“Both learning and research require openness to new ideas and the ability to argue productively,” Ruger wrote. “That requires standing against censorship.”

The Koch political behemoth — a multibillion-dollar umbrella of foundations and a political action committee — was built by brothers Charles and David Koch out of the family’s Kansas-based business empire during the 1980s and 1990s. Though David Koch died in 2018, the network has continued to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into organizations and politics that push for small government, lower taxes, deregulation, free speech, academic freedom and a conservative judiciary.

The organization’s opposition to the race and education bans has not kept the groups it has long supported out of the fight. In Wisconsin, parents seeking to recall school board members have received help this year from the Koch-supported Wisconsin Institute for Liberty and Law. The Milwaukee law firm received $310,000 from the Charles Koch Foundation for five years through 2019, the last year with public records available and before critical race theory flared as a GOP rallying point. The money was in the form of grants that were aimed at protecting free speech on college campuses, a Koch spokesman said.

The foundation and the Charles Koch Institute also contributed over the same period about $75,000 to State Policy Network, a conservative think tank that has promoted the bans. However, the grants, also before the 2021 wave of legislation, helped sponsor an annual meeting, an internship and a panel discussion on business, the Koch spokesman said.

Among the most prominent drivers behind the legislative bans was another Koch-backed group, the American Legislative Exchange Council. The Chicago-based conservative policymaking group provides model legislation for conservative lawmakers and has promoted measures to ban critical race theory in schools this year.

The Stand Together Foundation and its related groups contributed $2.7 million to ALEC between 2015 and 2019.

None of it was targeted for limiting schools’ curriculum on history and race, and was awarded before the issue became a Republican priority, Stand Together spokesman Bill Riggs said.

In 2020, ALEC continued to receive money from two Koch foundations, donations that were earmarked for trade, regulatory and fiscal policy, as well as advocating free speech and providing scholarships, Riggs said.

Riggs did not disclose the 2020 total given. Only contributions through 2019 are searchable through publicly available tax documents. Contributions for 2020 won’t be available to the public until mid-November.

Riggs accused Koch critics of a “misinformation game” that suggests the network is secretly supporting a policy it does not. He noted Koch groups give to a broad spectrum of organizations that align with some of its founders’ values, if not all of their views.

The Charles Koch Foundation contributed to the Democratic-leaning Brookings Institution in 2018 and 2019 on issues related to foreign policy, Riggs said. Last year, the Koch network helped create Heal America, a faith-based program aimed at fighting “racial injustice with love and redemption,” according to its website. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban and television commentator Van Jones, a Democrat, have both participated in events.

Riggs declined to say whether the Koch network would refuse to contribute to groups supporting bans on teaching critical race theory, such as ALEC, noting it prescribes in grant agreements the purpose of the money. He also declined to say whether they would rethink support for political candidates who also back the policy.

The Koch-backed political action committee Americans for Prosperity Action spent at least $9.7 million backing North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis in his tough campaign for reelection to the Senate last year, according to Federal Election Commission reports.

Tillis was prominent sponsor of a measure this year to prohibit using of federal money to teach the 1619 Project in elementary, middle and high school. The bill has not advanced in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Endorsements by Americans for Prosperity Action are based on several factors including voting records, statements, how they lead on lead on key issues, “as well as how they distinguish themselves as leaders capable of bringing people together to drive solutions,” Riggs said.

“But there is no single litmus test issue. We recognize no one is going to agree on everything,” he said.

____

Republished with permission from The Associated Press.

Associated Press


6 comments

  • PeterH

    September 29, 2021 at 9:58 am

    The Republican call for “book burning” is a step too far for the Koch family. The last thing we need in America is for welfare dependent red state Governors and Congressmen to dictate what is being taught in schools. Leave education to the educators! Every high school student needs to understand slavery, lynching and what the white underclass in Tulsa, OK did to upper middle class African Americans!

    • JD

      September 29, 2021 at 10:10 am

      The Monster the Kochs created is starting to bite the hands that fed it? Kind of like the rally crowd’s reaction to Trump mentioning they should get a vaccine that he backed off?

      Call a spade a spade. CRT isn’t liked because it’s battle being played in the culture wars (which is just the other side of the highly disliked “cancel culture”) to a pandering effect.

      It’s meant to piss off and mobilize people that feel shafted because of affirmative action. It will bite everyone in the ass by burying it in the long run. But nobody cares about the long run anymore.

  • Ron Ogden

    September 29, 2021 at 12:23 pm

    CRT’s time has come and gone. It was a ploy, just like every new belch from the racist left is a ploy. There’s not a proggie operative out there that actually supports a race-neutral society. Why not? Because race neutrality discourages conflict and conflict is their life–as I am sure the above can attest. Marx blessed conflict, and you can’t be a Marxist without it.

    • JD

      September 29, 2021 at 1:06 pm

      Seems like there’s a fair share of conflict coming from both sides. If it wasn’t race, it is class. If it is not class it is culture.

      But yes, civilized debate and civilized conflict is how we grow and adapt as a society and country. It’s a good thing. Violent repression and banned ideas are not.

      So why is race still an issue after 60 years?

      Burying race issues (which is really a culture conflict) or ignoring it didn’t make it’s issues go away. In fact it got worse.

      Banning the talking and teaching of different ideologies in education is the worst thing in the world. Give then all equal air time and teach critical thinking. This will give people the freedom to figure it out for themselves.

      Monolithic anything leads to stagnation and death.

  • Ron Ogden

    September 29, 2021 at 1:44 pm

    “But yes, civilized debate and civilized conflict is how we grow and adapt as a society and country. It’s a good thing. Violent repression and banned ideas are not.”
    Weasel words. There is nothing civilized about “hate-the-White-folks” lessons.
    Banned ideas? Let’s talk about allowing students to pray in the classroom and including the history of Christian philosophy in support of Western democratic ideals as elements of civic class? All for it?

  • JD

    September 29, 2021 at 2:15 pm

    There’s zero weaseling in my words. You merely trying to imply it because you think I am against you, while I am merely separating the pieces of the ideologies and evaluate them alone with critical thinking.

    And you seem to be creating and bringing forth the conflict here while you are making my point. There seems to be a festering coal of anger with the “hate-the-white-folks” comment that isn’t addressed. Where is the race-neutrality you wrote of? What would address that for you?

    “Let’s talk about allowing students to pray in the classroom and including the history of Christian philosophy in support of Western democratic ideals as elements of civic class? All for it?”

    As a history lesson or lesson in civics how religion shapes society? As an example of ideological choice?

    Allowing prayer for the groups that want to do it? Sure if it is treated as parental and personal choice within their group. Yes, by all means. All in.

    But as doctrine for the whole? No. Not at all. We all well know we have separation of church and state in public schools as well as personal freedoms. My solution proposed satisfies both.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Daniel Figueroa, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Joe Henderson, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Mike Wright, and Tristan Wood.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories