Congressional redistricting may be coming to some states before 2024 elections. Even Florida?

"I voted" sticker on blue fabric
SCOTUS decision could have a domino effect.

The 2022 elections marked the first using new voting districts drawn from updated census data. Those districts typically last for a decade, but they could be short-lived in some states, perhaps including Florida, where a challenge to the current map is in play.

Court challenges could force lawmakers or special commissions to draw yet another set of maps before the 2024 elections for representatives in Congress and state capitols.

That means voters who were just shifted into new U.S. House or state legislative districts could be grouped with different communities when they go to vote the next time.

Here’s a look at some places where voting districts could change, and the reasons why.

RACE IN REDISTRICTING

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a lower court ruling that Alabama’s congressional districts likely violated the federal Voting Rights Act by diluting the political power of Black voters.

The ruling means the state’s Republican-led Legislature and GOP governor likely will have to draw new U.S. House districts in which Black voters comprise a majority — or close to it — in two of Alabama’s seven districts, instead of only one.

The ruling also could lead to new U.S. House districts in Louisiana, and potentially Georgia.

While considering the Alabama case, the Supreme Court had put a hold on a similar lower court ruling that Louisiana’s districts must be redrawn to create a second majority-Black district. That’s likely to be lifted. A federal judge in Georgia last year also said some of its congressional and state legislative districts likely violated the Voting Rights Act, but no final decision has been issued.

Voting Rights Acts challenges are in the early stages in Texas. Lawsuits also allege that state legislative districts dilute the voting strength of Hispanic residents in Washington and Native Americans in North Dakota.

Though based on different legal theories, other lawsuits allege districts were drawn to the detriment of minority votes in Arkansas and Florida. The Supreme Court also has agreed to review a lower court ruling that a South Carolina congressional district discriminates against Black voters.

In North Carolina, a Democratic majority of the state Supreme Court ruled last year that congressional districts drawn by the Republican-led General Assembly were an illegal partisan gerrymander and instead allowed a map drawn by judges to be used for the 2022 elections. While that case was on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, voters elected a Republican majority to the state Supreme Court. Those judges in April reversed the previous ruling and declared there was no constitutional prohibition on partisan gerrymandering.

Whatever the U.S. Supreme Court does with the original appeal, state lawmakers are planning to redraw congressional districts before the next election — giving Republicans a chance at winning more seats than the current 7-7 split.

In Ohio, the state Supreme Court rejected multiple maps drawn by Republican officials for U.S. House, state Senate and state House districts. But courts allowed the 2022 elections to go forward anyway using those maps, directing new districts to be drawn before the next elections.

Republican state lawmakers have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the congressional map rejection. If they lose, they will have to draw new maps. Meanwhile, a Republican-led commission responsible for drawing state legislative maps is expected to meet later this year to make another attempt.

MORE PARTISAN CHALLENGES

Cases are pending before the top courts in New Mexico and Utah claiming that their congressional districts are illegal partisan gerrymanders — in New Mexico’s case benefitting Democrats, and in Utah’s aiding Republicans.

The New Mexico Supreme Court heard arguments in January but has not ruled on whether to dismiss the lawsuit brought by Republicans. The lawsuit contends Democratic lawmakers illegally divided up the southeastern corner of the state — an oil-producing Republican stronghold — into three districts “for raw political gain.” Democrats won all three districts in the 2022 elections.

The Utah Supreme Court is to hear arguments in July on whether a trial can go forward in a lawsuit contending Republican lawmakers engaged in illegal partisan gerrymandering by splitting Salt Lake County — the most politically competitive area — among four congressional districts. Republicans won all four districts in last year’s elections.

In Kentucky, a trial court last November rejected a partisan gerrymandering claim brought by Democrats against congressional and state House maps adopted by the Republican-led Legislature. That case has been appealed to the state Supreme Court.

WISCONSIN, TOO?

Though there is no current redistricting challenge in Wisconsin, there could be by the end of the summer. That could open the potential for new districts before the 2024 elections.

Voters in April elected a new Democrat-backed judge to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, ensuring that liberals will take over majority control when Judge Janet Protasiewicz officially joins the court in August.

Protasiewicz said during the campaign that she thought the current maps were “rigged” and she wanted to revisit them.

That’s raised hopes among Democrats that the high court could be more receptive to a lawsuit alleging that the current state legislative and congressional districts provide an unfair advantage for Republicans. Though the current districts were approved by the court, they were modeled after previous Republican-drawn districts that gave the GOP a strong edge over the past decade.

Jeff Mandell, a Madison attorney, said he and others opposed to the maps plan to file a legal challenge shortly after Protasiewicz joins the court.

“We think the people of Wisconsin deserve a chance for this new court to take a fresh look at this issue,” Mandell said.

Associated Press


6 comments

  • Eduarde Slaveen Nation 👍

    June 10, 2023 at 2:44 pm

    This vile and vulgar party of the super rich and their sub-ape, terrorist puppets can’t be annihilated fast enough.

    • Kai

      June 10, 2023 at 10:20 pm

      So true👍

  • AnneLarry

    June 10, 2023 at 3:00 pm

    I just got $30,850 from my last month of work doing this online part time. I joined 4 months ago and I know how easy it is to get paid for this job. Register now via the website below.
    .
    .
    Detail Are Here——————————————————>>> shorturl.ae/qbxu2

  • Kai

    June 10, 2023 at 10:26 pm

    So after reading this article what I’ve gathered is that some republican Supreme courts are saying there’s no racist gerrymandering. Surprise surprise! But in other states they’re saying there really IS racist gerrymandering and the maps need to be redrawn. Whatever the case is, this is all Republicans have, and that’s the House. They’ll never be able to win the popular vote. Never be able to win the presidency, but will always be able to gerrymander the heck out of black districts giving them favor to win the majority of the house seats. The only way for dems to offset this partisan gerrymandering is to continue voting in large numbers. So yes, the house will go back n forth between both parties every other election cycle but Republicans will struggle in swing states for the senate and the white house.

    • Dont Say FLA

      June 11, 2023 at 9:47 am

      It’s more than gerrymandering. GOP Secretaries of State also close the voting precincts of poor liberals, sending them all to affluent liberal precincts.

      The affluent precinct’s liberals who could have fought it, had they known, they never know until they show up to vote and there’s a 3 or 4 hour surprise wait when it had never taken more than 15 minutes, ever.

      Only the folks whose precincts are closed have to be notified about the change to their precinct.

      The affluent folks, despite being affected by changes, don’t have to be notified that 8x as many voters will be at their precinct next time because their precinct has not changed LOCATION.

  • Stephanie Anderson

    June 11, 2023 at 9:14 am

    Working part-time, I bring household about 13,000 per month. I was sharp to find out after hearing many others portray how much cash they were able to make online. Well, it all came to pass and completely adjusted my ba-50 life. By and by, everyone has got to endeavor this work by utilizing this location.
    .
    .
    Detail Are Here————————————————>>> ExtraMoney55.blogspot.com/

     

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories