Donald Trump wants New York hush money trial delayed until Supreme Court rules on immunity claims
Image via AP.

Donald Trump court
The question of whether a former President is immune from federal prosecution for official acts taken in office is legally untested.

Donald Trump is seeking to delay his March 25 hush money trial until the Supreme Court rules on the presidential immunity claims he raised in another of his criminal cases.

The Republican former President’s lawyers on Monday asked Manhattan Judge Juan Manuel Merchan to adjourn the New York criminal trial indefinitely until Trump’s immunity claim in his Washington, D.C., election interference case is resolved. Merchan did not immediately rule.

Trump contends he is immune from prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. His lawyers argue some of the evidence and alleged acts in the hush money case overlap with his time in the White House and constitute official acts.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments April 25, a month after the scheduled start of jury selection in Trump’s hush money case. It is the first of his four criminal cases slated to go to trial as he closes in on the Republican presidential nomination in his quest to retake the White House.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office declined to comment. Prosecutors are expected to respond to Trump’s delay request in court papers later this week.

Trump first raised the immunity issue in his Washington, D.C., criminal case, which involves allegations that he worked to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the run-up to the violent riot by his supporters at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The hush money case centers on allegations that Trump falsified his company’s internal records to hide the true nature of payments to his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who helped Trump bury negative stories during his 2016 presidential campaign. Among other things, Cohen paid porn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump years earlier.

Trump’s lawyers argue that some evidence Manhattan prosecutors plan to introduce at the hush money trial, including messages he posted on social media in 2018 about money paid to Cohen, were from his time as President and constituted official acts.

Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. He has denied having a sexual encounter with Daniels, and his lawyers argue the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses and not part of any cover-up.

A federal judge last year rejected Trump’s claim that allegations in the hush money indictment involved official duties, nixing his bid to move the case from state court to federal court. Had the case been moved to federal court, Trump’s lawyers could’ve tried to get the charges dismissed on the grounds that federal officials have immunity from prosecution over actions taken as part of their official duties.

“The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the matter was a purely a personal item of the President — a cover-up of an embarrassing event,” U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein wrote last July. “Hush money paid to an adult film star is not related to a President’s official acts. It does not reflect in any way the color of the President’s official duties.”

Trump’s lawyers appealed Hellerstein’s ruling, but dropped the appeal in November. They said they were doing so with prejudice, meaning they couldn’t change their minds.

The question of whether a former President is immune from federal prosecution for official acts taken in office is legally untested.

Prosecutors in the Washington, D.C., case have said no such immunity exists and that, in any event, none of the actions Trump is alleged to have taken in the indictment charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden count as official acts.

The trial judge in Washington and a federal appeals court have both ruled against Trump, but the high court agreed last month to give the matter fresh consideration — a decision that delays the federal case in Washington and injects fresh uncertainty as to when it might reach trial.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.

Associated Press


5 comments

  • ScienceBLVR

    March 11, 2024 at 4:19 pm

    “Lock him up! Lock him up!

  • I Feel Your Burning Shame All The Way In Manhattan

    March 11, 2024 at 4:34 pm

    Child of a Nazi, a Christian, a citizen of SuperMax Peninsula Florida.

  • Dont Say FLA

    March 11, 2024 at 4:52 pm

    The SCOTUS’s absolutely ridiculous willingness to take the absolute immunity case and to issue a ruling on Presidential absolute immunity isn’t just a gift to Trump in delaying the ruling until after the election.

    The deferral is also self-preservation for the Republican justices so they when they issue their ruling of “yes, Presidents have absolute immunity,” they aren’t ruling that President Biden could have them all murdered and their murders at Biden’s instruction would be totally legal and perfectly fine.

    They took the case because they plan to say Yes, presidents have absolute immunity, but they’ll announce that ruling only once the President is a Republican like the super majority of them are, allowing for President Trump to then order assassinations of the left leaning justices, senators, and house reps, and all of that will be perfectly legal and totally fine.

    Not. Good.

  • Michael K

    March 11, 2024 at 5:04 pm

    The only reason Trump is running for president is to avoid prosecution – which he has done throughout most of his life. That and more of the grift – like the $2 billion Javanka got from the Saudis.

  • PeterH

    March 11, 2024 at 8:32 pm

    Didn’t Trump pay off the porn star before he was sworn into office? Why does he expect immunity?

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704