Joe Geller files National Popular Vote bill, sees greater urgency for change than ever

The move comes as Donald Trump challenges election results in several states.

Democratic Rep. Joe Geller once again filed legislation that could radically change how presidents are elected. His desire? Let the candidate with the most votes win.

He filed legislation (HB 39) that would add Florida to a national pact to award electoral votes for President based on the national popular vote. Florida, like most states, now awards all its electoral votes to the popular vote winner statewide. The Aventura Democrat has filed similar bills in prior Sessions, but feels a greater urgency on the matter than ever.

“Recent events highlight that the vote of the people could have been hijacked, theoretically at least, in the states,” Geller said.

His legislation hits the hopper as President Donald Trump continues to wage court challenges regarding the outcome of the 2020 election in several states Democrat Joe Biden won on his way to defeating Trump last month. Trump continues to lobby Pennsylvania lawmakers to throw out Biden’s win there as attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis work on efforts in other states. In Arizona, the state Republican Party encouraged voters to prepare for a fight in the streets.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has openly encouraged Republican officials in Michigan and Pennsylvania to buck election results and simply sit a slate of pro-Trump electors despite Biden winning in certified results. That’s generated some speculation within political circles about whether Florida would have gone that route, despite lawmakers dismissing such a plan as “preposterous” ahead of the election.

It’s a series of events that Geller believes makes it more important than ever to put laws in place binding electors to follow a nationwide popular vote.

Geller noted the legislation officially was filed Tuesday, “Safe Harbor Day.” That’s the day when all states are expected to certify the elections and closing off potential challenges to how they should be awarded.

But the recent tumult also more widely exposed the machinations of the Electoral College and how it can be challenged at a variety of levels. Geller, and national leaders for the National Popular Vote movement lobbying for bills in states, note the change proposed in the legislation does not in fact eliminate the Electoral College. Rather, it simply changes how states direct electors to vote.

That raises the question, would passage of Geller’s bill prevent legal challenges like those waged on Trump’s behalf this year? Geller believes it would. If a law existed in Florida statutes that required the state to honor the national vote, courts would stop a hypothetical attempt by lawmakers to award Florida’s electoral votes in an alternative fashion.

Biden won the national popular vote by more than 7 million votes. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016 by about 3 million votes.

Jacob Ogles

Jacob Ogles has covered politics in Florida since 2000 for regional outlets including SRQ Magazine in Sarasota, The News-Press in Fort Myers and The Daily Commercial in Leesburg. His work has appeared nationally in The Advocate, Wired and other publications. Events like SRQ’s Where The Votes Are workshops made Ogles one of Southwest Florida’s most respected political analysts, and outlets like WWSB ABC 7 and WSRQ Sarasota have featured his insights. He can be reached at [email protected].


  • Nicki Wood

    December 8, 2020 at 12:12 pm

    No the popular vote should not be inacted because the smaller, agricultural & less populated States would be lost by big States with larger populations. These larger populated States would never see or value the needs & wishes of the other states.

  • Sonja Fitch

    December 9, 2020 at 6:31 am

    Yes the sooner the better! Cancel Electoral College bs! The only reason to have an Electoral College should have zero influence on the one person one vote that is the most important democratic value! Maybe someone else is more experienced than me can come up with other uses of the Electoral College.

  • Suzanne Low

    December 9, 2020 at 11:32 am

    Actually, the small states (the 13 states with only three or four electoral votes) are the most disadvantaged and ignored group of states under the current state-by-state winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes. The reason is that political power in presidential elections comes from being a closely divided battleground state, and almost all of the small states are noncompetitive states in presidential elections.
    The small states are not ignored because of their low population, but because they are not closely divided battleground states. The 12 small non-battleground states have about the same population (12 million) as the closely divided battleground state of Ohio. The 12 small states have 40 electoral votes, more than twice Ohio’s 18 electoral votes. However, Ohio received 73 of 253 post-convention campaign events in 2012, while the 12 small non-battleground states received none.
    The National Popular Vote would insure that every vote for President would count equally regardless of where the voter lives.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn