Some states will spend pandemic stimulus money quicker than others

Biden bucks boost budgets, raise questions.

Though still awaiting money from the latest federal coronavirus relief act, some governors and state lawmakers already are making plans to add the multibillion-dollar boon to their budgets.

Among their priorities: bailing out depleted unemployment accounts, expanding high-speed internet and providing additional aid to schools and businesses.

The $1.9 trillion pandemic relief law signed by President Joe Biden earlier this year contains $350 billion of flexible aid for state and local governments, plus billions of dollars more for specific programs such as housing assistance. Unlike earlier coronavirus aid, states have broad leeway to use the money to plug budget holes, invest in certain infrastructure or address the “negative economic impacts” of the pandemic.

States are expected to receive an initial installment soon, with a second round coming a year later.

“A billion dollars has just fallen from the sky, in some respects,” said Vermont Gov. Phil Scott, a Republican. “It’s here, right in front of us. We have to invest it wisely.”

Like many governors, Scott hadn’t accounted for a new influx of federal money when he presented a budget plan earlier this year. Now he’s working with lawmakers to add it to the state’s spending plan while still awaiting guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department on specific ways the money can — or can’t — be used.

In other states, the spending plans include bonuses for teachers and first-responders; aid to movie theaters and entertainment venues; construction at parks and public facilities; and grants to farmers, commercial fishing operations and food processors.

Officials in a dozen states told The Associated Press they are waiting for Treasury Department guidance before developing specific spending plans. Federal law prohibits states from using the aid to make pension payments or fund tax cuts. Some state officials are concerned that other uses also could be ruled out, triggering a provision requiring them to repay the federal government.

The federal law, known as the American Rescue Plan, comes on top of $150 billion the federal government sent directly to states and local governments last year.

This year’s law cites infrastructure for water, sewer and broadband internet as allowable uses. It’s less clear whether money can be used for other infrastructure, such as roads and bridges. But some states are planning to do so, anyway.

A potentially wide-ranging provision allows states to use the federal aid for “government services” affected by a pandemic-induced reduction in revenue. States also can use the aid to provide extra pay for essential workers, such as the $1,000 bonuses included in a Florida budget for first-responders, teachers and early learning instructors.

Federal law allows states to address the pandemic’s economic effects by providing aid to households, small businesses, nonprofits and industries such as tourism, travel and hospitality. But that doesn’t necessarily prevent money from going to other purposes.

Associated Press


  • Dawn kennedy

    May 11, 2021 at 2:15 am

    To whom it may concern you are giving money to the poeple that are having kids to collect money from irs on taxes and welfare but what about helping the old poeple out and poele like me that have a disability and cant work because of it we also need help too not just about helping poele that have a family im not knocking the poeple that have family’s but you need to think also about the elderly and disabled poeple to not fare not helping the elderly and disabled people with the stimulus check we need money also we are on disability and don’t get that much money on disability like poeple think we do we can’t live on what disability give us and don’t even get that much on food stamps either and cant aford to buy food with what they give us or pay are bills with want disability give us poeple we should not even be around us old poeple

  • Lillie Lucas

    May 18, 2021 at 8:18 pm

    I have noticed that local officials are not considering sanitation workers as essential or frontline workers even though their work schedule was not interrupted by the pandemic and most importantly, they are at an even greater risk of contracting the virus since they handle and dispose of the hazard waste. Imagine what your community would be like if these workers were laid off or shut down for the pandemic. I can tell you that there would be an infestation of germs and a breeding ground for all kinds of diseases. Even though these workers are the least esteemed, they provide a service all of us need. A push should be made to specifically name them as essential workers and reward them for the risk they take in providing this most needed service for their community.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Rick Flagg, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Joe Henderson, Janelle Irwin, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Jesse Scheckner, Scott Powers, Andrew Wilson, and Kelly Hayes.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704