In a state where millions rely on Social Security benefits and Medicare, a new poll shows that both issues resonate with a large swath of Florida’s mature voters, who are usually among the most dependable voters in deciding elections.
A poll commissioned by AARP of voters aged 50 and older shows that Social Security and Medicare were the second most critical issues in the state behind inflation and rising prices. The poll numbers suggest they could become an important flash point in the tightening race between Republican incumbent Sen. Marco Rubio and Democratic Rep. Val Demings.
Florida, the nation’s third-largest state, had more than 5.4 million people who received Social Security benefits in 2020. And nearly 4.9 million were enrolled in Medicare as of May 2022.
The poll of older voters found that 12% said Social Security and Medicare were the most prominent issues to them, notching just behind the 15% who said inflation and rising prices were their most critical issues.
Meanwhile, 88% of the 50-plus age cohort also identified Social Security as an extremely important issue when determining who to vote for. When broken down by party line, 91% of registered Democrats compared to 87% of Republicans and 83% of independents identified it as important or very important.
When asked, 92% of voters also said they would be more likely to support a Senate candidate who opposes cuts to workers’ earned Social Security benefits. This position is overwhelmingly true for Democrats, 97%, and extremely high, 90%, among Republicans and independents.
Working on behalf of AARP Florida, the bipartisan polling team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research interviewed 1,626 likely Florida voters statewide Aug. 24-31. The sample included 500 likely voters and oversamples of 550 likely voters 50 and older, 262 Hispanic likely voters 50 and older, and 314 Black likely voters 50 and older.
The margin of error for voters 50 and older was 3.3 percentage points.
The AARP poll also tracks what it calls “Senate persuadable” voters or those who haven’t definitively decided yet who to vote for. They account for 19% of the 50-plus segment of the electorate.
The percentage of these undecided Senate voters who identified the fate of Social Security benefits as their most important issue (13%) exceeded their peers (12%). But fewer of those persuadables (91%) reported being more likely to support a candidate who supports maintaining Social Security.
Nationwide, Social Security provided a supplemental source of income in 2020 for 69.8 million people (55% were women), according to federal data. The Social Security Administration administers four types of benefits: retiree, disability, surviving spouses or children, and supplemental security income or SSI.
The government pays for Social Security benefits through payroll taxes, and the program is funded on a somewhat real-time basis. Nearly 90% of the $1.1 trillion costs of the program in 2020 were funded through payroll taxes collected in 2020, according to the federal government.
In the wake of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Rubio said he would work with Sen. Mitt Romney to file what is now being called The New Parent Act — legislation to allow parents to use a portion of their Social Security benefits for up to three months of paid parental leave after the birth or adoption of a child.
While Rubio said it would “make a real difference to American parents and children in need,” an Urban Institute analysis of the plan found that by the time the paid leave person retires, the worker would have lost somewhere between $9,200 and $22,100 in retirement benefits (in inflation-adjusted 2018 dollars).
Democrats pounced on the announcement, noting that Rubio has repeatedly said since 2010 that those programs will bankrupt the United States and previously suggested increasing the retirement age.
While politicians often have heated debates about Medicare, support among voters transcends party lines, the AARP poll shows.
Ninety-two percent of those polled said they would be more likely to get behind a candidate who opposes Medicare cuts and instead supports policies to ensure seniors “get the health care they need.”
When broken down by party, Democrats are more enthusiastic about the issue, with 99% of Democrats saying they would be more likely to support a candidate who protected Medicare from cuts compared to just 89% of Republicans and independents.
At the same time, 91% of respondents said they would be more likely or much more likely to support candidates who backed policies to allow Medicare to negotiate for prescription drug costs. The recently passed “Inflation Reduction Act,” which Demings voted for, and Rubio opposed, will enable Medicare to negotiate prices for certain high price drugs starting in 2026. The legislation also puts in place next year a cap on copays for Medicare recipients who receive insulin.
Again, when broken down by party, 97% of Democrats said the position of letting Medicare negotiate for drug prices would likely impact whether they supported candidates. That is compared to 87% and 89% of Republicans and independents who reported the same.
And though they are policies favored by voters, the family-caregiver tax credit and expanding long-term care options have less sway with voters in the Senate race, with just 86% reporting they would be more likely to support candidates because they endorsed the ideas.
4 comments
Lynda
September 7, 2022 at 9:35 am
If Scott and Rubio bothered to listen to Florida voters instead of out-of state dark money donors, it would be obvious to support Social Security and Medicare. Unfortunately for these two from the party formerly known as Republican they don’t listen to us and if they were ever to tell us their positions have “changed”, most of us would not believe them without concrete actions.
Certainly wage earning voters receiving or close to receiving SS benefits and using Medicare support both programs. The other two supporting voting blocks come from the the children and grandchildren of those who depend on SS and Medicare benefits and the Medical providers/hospitals who get paid (not as much as they would like, but enough to stay in business).
The party formerly known as Republican insists on maintaining an obsolete position they have held since the earliest days of these important programs. Like so many of their policy positions it is a foolish one and costs them votes as the polling indicates. The gerrymandering, voter suppressing tactics and lying to create fear in voters are needed by Republicans because their policy positions are so unpopular with voters.
Republicans should work with the Democratic party to ensure these programs are always going to be a source of stability. Florida’s Republican (in name only) Governor and the Legislature he controls should immediately begin to participate in Medicaid rather than using the fake opposition tactics to cost Florida millions of dollars which would assist its poorest citizens.
Impeach Biden
September 7, 2022 at 8:28 pm
Must be election season. Once again and over and over the Democrats pull out that “The Republicans are going to take your medical, social security, prescription drugs”. Come on. If you believe this you are simply delusional. This is the Democrat talking point from years and years ago. This is simply not the case. Stop watching CNN, MSNBC and reading the Sun Sentinel.
Tjb
September 8, 2022 at 1:21 pm
Rubio and Rick Scott have stated that they would make significant changes to Medicare and Social Security. These changes will bring on economic hardship to many retirees living on fixed incomes. Is their plan to create a new generation of retirees living close to homelessness?
Lala
September 17, 2022 at 4:06 pm
How about the Dems using our SS monies to finance millions of illegal aliens & replacing it with IOUs but never paid back? They need to stop!!!
Comments are closed.