![Yellen](https://floridapolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/1000-1.webp)
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Sunday the federal government would not bail out Silicon Valley Bank, but is working to help depositors who are concerned about their money.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures deposits up to $250,000, but many of the companies and wealthy people who used the bank — known for its relationships with technology startups and venture capital — had more than that amount in their account. There are fears that some workers across the country won’t receive their paychecks.
No plan had been announced on Sunday afternoon with hours to go until Asian markets opened. There were widespread hopes that Silicon Valley Bank would be acquired, but it was unclear if a buyer would emerge.
Federal officials set a deadline of 2 p.m. for potential buyers to submit bids in a government auction for the bank, according to a person who familiar with the matter. The person requested anonymity to talk about private conversations. Bloomberg was first to report the auction.
Yellen, in her Sunday morning interview with CBS’ “Face the Nation,” provided few details on the government’s next steps. But she emphasized that the situation was much different from the financial crisis almost 15 years ago, which led to bank bailouts to protect the industry.
“We’re not going to do that again,” she said. “But we are concerned about depositors, and we’re focused on trying to meet their needs.”
With Wall Street rattled, Yellen tried to reassure Americans that there will be no domino effect after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
“The American banking system is really safe and well capitalized,” she said. “It’s resilient.”
Silicon Valley Bank, based in Santa Clara, California, is the nation’s 16th-largest bank. It was the second biggest bank failure in U.S. history after the collapse of Washington Mutual in 2008. The bank served mostly technology workers and venture capital-backed companies, including some of the industry’s best-known brands.
Silicon Valley Bank began its slide into insolvency when its customers, largely technology companies that needed cash as they struggled to get financing, started withdrawing their deposits. The bank had to sell bonds at a loss to cover the withdrawals, leading to the largest failure of a U.S. financial institution since the height of the financial crisis.
Yellen described rising interest rates, which have been increased by the Federal Reserve to combat inflation, as the core problem for Silicon Valley Bank. Many of its assets, such as bonds or mortgage-backed securities, lost market value as rates climbed.
“The problems with the tech sector aren’t at the heart of the problems at this bank,” she said.
Yellen said she expected regulators to consider “a wide range of available options,” including the acquisition of Silicon Valley Bank by another institution. No buyer has been announced.
Sheila Bair, who was the FDIC chair during the 2008 financial crisis, recalled that with almost all the bank failures during that time, “we sold a failed bank to a healthy bank. And usually, the healthy acquirer would also cover the uninsured because they wanted the franchise value of those large depositors so optimally, that’s the best outcome.” But with Silicon Valley Bank, she told NBC’s “Meet the Press,” “this was a liquidity failure, it was a bank run, so they didn’t have time to prepare to market the bank. So they’re having to do that now, and playing catch-up.”
Regulators seized the bank’s assets on Friday. Deposits that are insured by the federal government are supposed to be available by Monday morning.
“I’ve been working all weekend with our banking regulators to design appropriate policies to address this situation,” Yellen said. “I can’t really provide further details at this time.”
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a California Republican, told Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures” that he hoped the administration would announce the next steps as soon as Sunday.
“They do have the tools to handle the current situation, they do know the seriousness of this and they are working to try to come forward with some announcement before the markets open,” he said.
McCarthy also expressed hope that Silicon Valley Bank would be purchased.
“I think that would be the best outcome to move forward and cool the markets and let people understand that we can move forward in the right manner,” he said.
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, whose district includes the city where the bank has its headquarters, said it was imperative that the government guarantee all depositors and that they “have full access to their accounts Monday morning.”
“Time is ticking,” he told CBS.
Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said in an interview with ABC News’ “This Week” he was concerned the bank’s collapse could prompt nervous people to transfer money from other regional banks to larger institutions.
“We don’t want further consolidation,” he said.
Warner suggested there would be a “moral hazard” in reimbursing depositors in excess of the $250,000 limit and said an acquisition would be the best next step.
“I’m more optimistic this morning than I was yesterday afternoon at this time,” he said. “But, again, we will see how this plays out during the rest of the day.”
He added: “What we’ve got to focus on right now is how do we make sure there’s not contagion.”
President Joe Biden and Gov. Gavin Newsom, a California Democrat, spoke about “efforts to address the situation” on Saturday, although the White House did not provide additional details on next steps.
Newsom said the goal was to “stabilize the situation as quickly as possible, to protect jobs, people’s livelihoods, and the entire innovation ecosystem that has served as a tent pole for our economy.”
___
Republished with permission of The Associated Press.
3 comments
TD
March 13, 2023 at 12:01 pm
This is just smoke to obscure the fact that she is fully in line with Larry Summers and David Sacks re: making depositors whole, so that these greedy pigs don’t lose a dime and get paid back 100 cents on the dollar by the taxpayer.
These are the same people (Summers et al) who view forgiving a measly $10,000 of student loan debt as an unforgivable abomination.
Amazing how we suddenly have to treat everyone the same when it is convenient for the rich. The idea that people with > $250K in a deposit account are somehow similarly situated to ordinary people with much less who would already be covered if their bank failed is obscene! Looting in broad daylight! And of course we can NEVER do ANYTHING to help those ordinary people, like by forgiving $10,000 of their debt, OH NO, that would be untenable! Clutch those pearls, swine!
Dems are ALL groomers
March 13, 2023 at 2:20 pm
I know you leftards are incapable of reason, but those with a modicum of sense, every decent American opposes forgiving loans because Senile Joe is not a dictator, and he has zero authority to “forgive” loans. Now if you also want to make the argument that the powers that be don’t have authority to make all those fat cats whole, swing away. Just leave Senile Joe and his usurping of authority out of it.
TD
March 13, 2023 at 6:38 pm
I did leave him out of it. My post said nothing about his unlawful means, only addressing the concept, which is what Summers et al btch and moan about.
There are plenty of idiots on the right as well. Witness David Sacks normiecons:
Them: Destroy the middle class. Lockdown cities. Force poison on people. Call them racist. Get us fired.
*one of their banks closes*
Normie cons: “let’s not push the division”
Comments are closed.