In new challenge to indictment, Donald Trump’s lawyers argue he had good basis to question election results

trumpdonald_11092022ap copy
Allegations are that foreign actors might have influenced the 2020 race and federal officials gave the public 'false assurances' about election security.

Donald Trump had a “good faith” basis to question the results of the 2020 election, his lawyers said in demanding that prosecutors turn over any evidence related to voting irregularities and potential foreign interference in the contest won by Democrat Joe Biden.

A defense motion filed late Monday in federal court in Washington asserts that Trump was not obligated to accept at face value the judgments of government officials who time and again found no widespread fraud in the election. It floats the possibility that foreign actors might have influenced the race and alleges that federal officials gave “false assurances” to the public about the security of the election that “outpaced” what the government actually knew.

“It was not unreasonable at the time, and certainly not criminal, for President Trump to disagree with officials now favored by the prosecution and to rely instead on the independent judgment that the American people elected him to use while leading the country,” the lawyers wrote.

The filing is the clearest indication yet that Trump’s lawyers are hoping to sow doubt before a jury in the legitimacy of the race or at least make the case that his skepticism was justified and not motivated by criminal intent. The lawyers seek permission to force special counsel Jack Smith’s team to produce vast swaths of information that they say could aid the defense, including the “impact of foreign influence” and “actual and attempted compromises of election infrastructure” as well as evidence of potential “political bias” that could have shaped the intelligence community’s assessment of the election.

Courts around the country and Trump’s own attorney general have found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome, and the Homeland Security Department’s cybersecurity arm pronounced it “the most secure in American history.” Smith’s team alleges that Trump, a Republican, ignored all of those findings and launched an illegal plot to undo the election and block the peaceful transfer of power.

But the Trump lawyers assert in the 37-page filing that he had reason to question the results.

The motion recounts Russian efforts in 2016 to undermine confidence in that year’s election, though it glosses over the intelligence community’s assessment that Moscow had a “clear preference” for Trump over his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

It also revisits the intelligence community’s effort in 2020 to discern potential interference by countries including Russia, China and Iran. It quotes from a Jan. 7, 2021 memo from John Ratcliffe, the then-director of national intelligence and a close Trump ally, that said China sought to influence the election. And it seeks information from prosecutors about a Russian cyberespionage campaign in 2019 and 2020 that affected numerous federal government agencies, with the lawyers saying that that intrusion calls into question the confidence being expressed by officials at that time in the security of the election.

“The Office cannot blame President Trump for public discord and distrust of the 2020 election results while refusing to turn over evidence that foreign actors stoked the very same flames that the Office identifies as inculpatory in the indictment,” the motion states.

It goes on to say: “The Office cannot rely on selected guidance and judgments by officials it favors from the Intelligence Community and law enforcement while ignoring evidence of political bias in those officials’ decision-making as well as cyberattacks and other interference, both actual and attempted, that targeted critical infrastructure and election facilities before, during, and after the 2020 election.”

Defense lawyers are also seeking to force prosecutors to turn over documents related to the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol, when pro-Trump loyalists stormed the building in a violent confrontation with police in an effort to disrupt the counting of electoral votes. The attorneys are looking in part for statements by prosecutors in other riot-related cases that they say could conflict with the Smith team’s assertion that Trump was responsible for the violence at the Capitol that day.

The Trump lawyers have already asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the indictment, saying he is shielded from prosecution by presidential immunity and arguing that the charges violate his First Amendment rights. Those requests are still pending.


Republished with permission from The Associated Press.

Associated Press


  • Jay Smif

    November 28, 2023 at 4:56 pm

    He was the original instigator of the Big Lie. He was saying in summer of 2020 that if he didn’t get re-elected it was because “the election was rigged.”

    Fry trump now!

  • Ocean Joe

    November 28, 2023 at 5:43 pm

    He had good reason to question the election because the My Pillow guy told him so.
    And because he is so insane he believes his own lies.

  • PeterH

    November 28, 2023 at 5:58 pm

    Trump lost! He lost sixty court cases. He was informed by every lawyer that he lost and Trump’s response to a MAGA cheerleader: “see what I have to deal with!”

    Trump followed up his lost by staging an attempted coup.

    Prosecutors need to keep these cases moving. The American voters need to know who we’re voting for or against!

    • PeterH

      November 28, 2023 at 6:55 pm

      Lost = loss

  • rick whitaker

    November 28, 2023 at 7:22 pm

    we all know trump is a serial loser and a bad businessmen. if you don’t know, you don’t care to know. the maga cult doesn’t want to know the truth about trump because that would make them look very foolish. they put all their eggs in trump’s basket

  • Elmo

    November 28, 2023 at 8:28 pm

    I mean come on. Everyone knows it was jewish space lasers that handed Joe the election. ‘the hell is wrong with you people!

    • My Take

      November 29, 2023 at 1:12 am

      Right. Occam’s Razor. Always choose the simplest reasonable explanation.

  • Sonja Fitch

    November 29, 2023 at 7:11 am

    “Good BASES’. BS! Yeah I meant bases not basis”. You can touch bases but not basis! Lol. Lol Trump loser!

  • My Take

    November 29, 2023 at 6:29 pm

    His lawyers are paid professional liars.. The truth means nothing. A convenient plausible lie is most often the goal. Òr a series of them.

  • My Take

    November 30, 2023 at 3:46 am

    “McCarthy says he doesn’t criticize Trump on TV because ‘it drives him crazy’ ” — The Hill
    Then, others, don’t let a day go by . . . .

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn


This is default text for notification bar