Armando J. Ibarra: Liberal overreach threatens to derail Kids Online Safety Act
The PROTECT Our Children Act will continue the effort on internet safety.

CYBERBULLYING-ONLINE-CHILD-ABUSE-10132022
This liberal overreach threatens to alienate conservatives and moderates alike and doom the bill before it even hits the Senate floor.

At both the state and federal levels, legislators are taking action to protect children online and ensure healthy social media habits for teens in the digital age. These legislative efforts, rooted in worthy intent and an important public interest, have ignited a vigorous debate over the means of achieving such protection.

Here in Florida, for example, parental rights groups protested when the state legislature passed legislation that would have overridden parents’ control over their kids’ social media. Luckily, Gov. Ron DeSantis stayed true to his word and sided with parents, vetoing the social media ban and working with the legislature to empower parents instead.

In Washington, however, bipartisan support for the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is at risk due to last-minute changes pushed by liberal activists that would undermine parental rights and centralize the power to censor in a Washington bureaucracy with little accountability to the American people.

This liberal overreach threatens to alienate conservatives and moderates alike and doom the bill before it even hits the Senate floor.

This controversial new language in KOSA would favor federal oversight by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rather than the nuanced enforcement of state attorneys general (AGs) that had previously been KOSA’s intended enforcement mechanism. KOSA’s original language, which gave state AGs enforcement power, made perfect sense because their proximity to their communities would allow them to adeptly navigate the complex balance between regulation, privacy, and innovation.

The decision to change KOSA so that enforcement authority sits with the FTC should raise alarm bells for anyone who cares about the effectiveness of this legislation and is even remotely concerned with government overreach.

Since the beginning of FTC Chair Lina Khan’s tenure in the Biden administration, the agency has been embroiled in scandal and dysfunction. Just last month, the House Judiciary Committee released a report exposing the FTC’s mismanagement, waste, and abuse of government resources in order to advance a “radical agenda detached from the FTC’s legal mandates.” This is not an organization we should be putting in charge of policing the content that youth see online.

The vagueness of certain KOSA provisions invites a range of abusive interpretations that could easily lead to a censorious approach to online content. We’ve seen countless examples of federal regulations that veered into the suppression of free speech and the erosion of privacy.

Swapping out state AG authority for a federal enforcer with an objective to spread partisan ideas not only undermines the bill’s purpose but also opens KOSA up to valid criticism from parents who don’t want Khan in the middle of children’s social media experiences.

If Washington lawmakers are serious about protecting kids online, they should restore state AGs authority in KOSA. Enforcement at the state level will ensure the law doesn’t expand beyond the intended scope and it avoids the consequences that would arise from allowing bureaucrats at the FTC to inject its progressive policy agenda into legislation intended to help protect children online.

Thankfully, Republicans have begun to wake up to the realities of this new KOSA language and question whether this bill will do more to protect children or to enhance the power of Washington bureaucrats.

Every Senate co-sponsor of KOSA — including Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott — should read this new language taking power away from state AGs, like Florida’s Ashley Moody, and recalibrate this legislation to ensure that it protects children, preserves parental rights, and prevents government overreach.

____

Armando J. Ibarra is a government affairs executive and policy adviser for companies, organizations, and leaders in the U.S. and Latin America. He serves as Chair of the Miami Young Republicans and Secretary of the Florida Federation of Young Republicans.

Guest Author


2 comments

  • ScienceBLVR

    March 7, 2024 at 2:27 pm

    Ugh, Armando, so much to unpack here, not sure where to start. Anything that limits Ashley Moodys SOP, is a great policy. Talk about government interference, every suit she files is designed to limit someone’s rights. You do realize what kind of state Florida has become, don’t you? We’re all for protecting kids, it’s just a shame we have to protect them from the radical right wing agenda…

  • Tom Leonard

    March 7, 2024 at 3:08 pm

    Anytime you hear some holier than though conservative blubbering about how some new law is to “Protect the Kids!!!” you can be absolutely sure that isn’t the case, and that the law is only designed to infringe on the rights of adults.

    This social media ban for kids garbage will only require ADULTS to provide ID to use social media, and then they’ll have a verified name, face, address and everything else they want attached to your online activity. It’s a big brother government overreach at it’s absolute WORST.

    The authors and supporters of such a thing should be ashamed of themselves. The book “1984” was not a How-To guide you filthy swine.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704