Senate pairs heat exposure preemption, child labor bills
At the eleventh-hour, Danny Burgess gets a challenger.

FLAPOL042022CH038
The bills 'are proof positive that this is a process and that we listen along the way.'

On the second-to-last day of the Regular Session, the Senate opted to combine two controversial bills struggling to cross the finish in an effort to get them to Gov. Ron DeSantis’ desk.

One day after sending HB 433 — which prevents local governments from requiring companies to provide shade and water breaks to outdoor workers — to the House, the Senate inserted the bill into HB 49, which allows 16- and 17-year-olds to work longer hours.

Both bills have received vocal pushback from Democrats, but GOP leaders in the House and Senate have also failed to reach consensus on the measures in the waning days of the Session.

The Senate has already pared back both bills from their original versions, and the language preferred by the House. The heat exposure preemption bill included a provision preempting cities and counties from requiring contractors and subcontractors to pay higher wages, but the Senate stripped that out before sending it back to the House.

And the child labor bill originally allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to work at 5:30 a.m. and until 11 p.m. and go longer without breaks.

Sen. Jason Pizzo, a Miami Democrat, took issue with the maneuver.

“Let’s wage war on poverty, not poor people,” Pizzo said.

But Sen. Danny Burgess, a Zephyrhills Republican sponsoring HB 49, said the changes to the bills reflected well on the Senate.

The bills “are proof positive that this is a process and that we listen along the way,” Burgess said.

Now, with one day left in the Session, the ball is in the House’s court, which must decide whether to pass the watered-down version of the bill or “bounce” it back to the Senate, likely killing both measures.

Also, lawmakers have already finished most of their business for the session, with the budget (HB 5001) and the tax cut package (HB 7073) still left to be passed on Friday.

Gray Rohrer


3 comments

  • Florida Legislature does not follow the law

    March 8, 2024 at 12:37 am

    Another example of a bill that does not follow the Single Subject requirement.

  • Mr Taggart

    March 8, 2024 at 7:23 am

    Dock that [orange picker] a day’s wages for nappin’ on the job! And pass me some more beans.

  • Back Seat Heat

    March 8, 2024 at 8:08 am

    And are we still requiring parents to put their youngest children in the back car seat where 100+ will be forgotten every summer and bake to death for a purpose of keeping 5-ish kids from dying each year in car crashes while seated in the front seat when theoretically they’d have survived that crash had they been seated in the back seat?

    And what is the net gain of back seat requirement legislation? 100+ dead babies every Florida summer, all of them baked to death.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704