Associated Press
Special Counsel Jack Smith is evaluating how to wind down the two federal cases against Donald Trump before he takes office in light of longstanding Justice Department policy that says sitting Presidents cannot be prosecuted, a person familiar with the matter said Wednesday.
Smith charged Trump last year with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 Presidential Election and illegally hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. But Trump’s election defeat of Kamala Harris means that the Justice Department believes he can no longer face prosecution in accordance with decades-old department legal opinions meant to shield Presidents from criminal charges while in office.
The person familiar with Smith’s plans was not authorized to discuss the matter by name and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press.
By moving to end the cases before the inauguration in January, Smith and the Justice Department would avert a potential showdown with Trump. The President-elect said as recently as last month that he would fire Smith, who was appointed in November 2022 by Attorney General Merrick Garland, “within two seconds” of taking office.
NBC News first reported Smith’s plans.
Smith’s two cases charge Trump in a conspiracy to undo the election results in the run-up to the Capitol riot, and with retaining top secret records at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and obstructing FBI efforts to recover them.
In the 2020 election interference case, Trump was scheduled to stand trial in March in Washington, where more than 1,000 of his supporters have been convicted of charges for their roles in the Capitol riot. But the case was halted as Trump pursued his sweeping claims of immunity from prosecution that ultimately landed before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trump could be emboldened by the Supreme Court’s ruling in July, which granted former Presidents expansive immunity from prosecution for acts taken in the White House and explicitly put off-limits any alleged conduct involving Trump’s discussions with the Justice Department. That included his efforts use the Justice Department to conduct sham election fraud investigations as part of his bid to stay in power.
The conservative-majority Supreme Court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine which of the other allegations in the indictment, if any, could move forward to trial.
In response, Smith’s team last month filed a 165-page brief laying out new evidence to persuade the Judge that the actions alleged in the indictment were taken in Trump’s private capacity as a candidate — not as Commander-in-Chief — and therefore can remain part of the case. Trump’s lawyers are scheduled to file their response later this month. Whatever Chutkan rules is expected to be appealed again to the Supreme Court, meaning a possible trial would be likely a year or more away.
___
Republished with permission of The Associated Press.
One comment
Dont Say FLA
November 6, 2024 at 4:12 pm
I mean Trump’s own voters just proved beyond any shadow of any doubt that USA elections are free and fair and that Trump’s “stolen election” claims that persisted from 2020 till yesterday (due to his one loss of three times he made the same claims) were, as most of already knew, nothing but lies.
2020 was not stolen, but even the MAGA party’s own proof through electing his President in 2024 probably still won’t convince them he lied about 2020 being stolen, and they fell for it.