
Republicans narrowly got their budget plan over the finish line. Now comes the hard part.
The resolution adopted this week was only a first step that allows Republicans to draft legislation that they can push through Congress without Democratic support. Next, they begin crafting a final bill with enough spending cuts to satisfy those on the right while not jeopardizing the reelection prospects of more vulnerable lawmakers whose constituents rely on key safety net programs.
With thin majorities in the House and the Senate, Republicans can afford to lose hardly any votes from their side of the aisle as they draft legislation, giving each lawmaker leverage over the process.
“It’s going to take all of us to get it done,” said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican.
The road ahead is daunting.
Republicans are determined to extend the individual tax cuts that were approved during President Donald Trump’s first term before they expire at year’s end. But they intend for the legislation to do far more than that, potentially enacting a host of tax reductions that Trump promised during the campaign, such as no income tax on tips and overtime.
And the tax cuts are only half the equation. Conservatives in the House gave the budget plan the final votes needed for passage Thursday after they said they received assurances from leadership in both chambers that they would work to have a final product with at least $1.5 trillion in spending cuts — forcing changes to federal programs including Medicaid that could prove hard for some in the party to support.
“The struggles Republicans have faced so far are only a glimmer of what’s to come,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer.
Rep. Max Miller, an Ohio Republican, senses a difficult fight for Republicans. He said Trump has made clear he doesn’t want any benefit cuts for those who get health insurance coverage through Medicaid, which could conflict with the desire some conservatives have for steep spending cuts.
“If it’s this rocky now, it’s only going to get worse from here on out if the Speaker is not able to get the entire conference in line,” Miller said.
Democrats have framed the debate as Republicans looking to slash key government programs so they can pass tax cuts that predominately help wealthier households. It’s a message Democrats will hammer home leading up to the 2026 midterm elections.
“At this point, they’re all worried about primaries and they are worried about Elon’s money, but they ought to be worried about a general election as well,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, referring to Trump’s billionaire ally and adviser, Elon Musk. “I think it’s going to be very difficult for a moderate Republican, if there’s still any left, to be able to vote for this and go home and defend it.”
Some Republicans also made clear to GOP leadership before Thursday’s budget vote that they will be closely monitoring the changes to Medicaid in the final bill.
“This was just making sure that there is a clear understanding here that there are a group of members that will not cut benefits from seniors and our most vulnerable New Yorkers who rely on Medicaid,” said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, a New York Republican
Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who is up for reelection next year, said she’s also made her position known to leadership.
“I could not make my position on Medicaid cuts clearer,” she said. “I am not going to support cuts that affect low-income families, disabled individuals, low-income seniors, rural hospitals.”
Republicans say their focus is on instilling work requirements for able-bodied beneficiaries and more rigorous eligibility assessments. But Democrats say Republicans can’t generate the savings being discussed without also cutting benefits.
Meanwhile, Republicans see extending the individual and estate tax cuts passed in Trump’s first term as key to their electoral success next year. The House Ways and Means Committee says a family of four making $80,610 a year, the median income in the United States, would see a $1,695 tax increase if the tax cuts are not extended.
Republicans spent the last few years blaming President Joe Biden’s administration for increasing the debt, and a key test will be how many keep that focus as they seek to extend and expand tax cuts.
A recent estimate from the Joint Committee on Taxation projects that extending the 2017 tax breaks will add $5.5 trillion over the next decade when including interest, and $4.6 trillion not including interest. On top of that, adding Trump’s campaign promises would swell the price tag to $7 trillion.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he’ll advocate for splitting the measure into two reconciliation bills if Republicans take too long to get to a final product.
“I’m going to say break it apart, because they need money for the border yesterday and they also need money for DoD,” Graham said, referring to the Department of Defense.
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he looked forward to the challenge and there was a lot of work ahead.
“The American people are counting on us,” Johnson said.
Rep. Tom Cole, an Oklahoma Republican, said he’s confident a final bill will pass with the House winning the most important tussles on the scope of taxes and spending cuts.
“I will bet you they will fold rather than inflict the largest tax increase in American history on their voters,” Cole said of the Senate. “And two-thirds of them, with all due respect, aren’t on the ballot next time. … Whereas everyone here is on the line. And our majority is much more on the line that their majority is.”
——
Republished with permission of The Associated Press.
6 comments
Michael K
April 11, 2025 at 8:42 am
Ah yes. How to cut ever more taxes for billionaires and make the middle class and poor suffer for it. But the real challenge for Republicans is marketing: how to piss on the rest of us and make us believe it’s raining.
Interesting to see what happens when the next hurricane hits and there’s no FEMA and millions lose health care. They can always eat cake, I suppose.
Darell Glass
April 11, 2025 at 9:59 am
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $10,000 dollars this last four weeks. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself If you don’t
Go ON my ProFILE
Peachy
April 11, 2025 at 10:21 am
Demos don’t support government efficiency.
They support men playing and dominating women’s sports
Dems support rioting, defacing, burning, looting if they don’t get their way.
Dems support gang bangers, drug dealers, human traffickers that are illegals in this country
Dems support voting for everyone without proof of citizenship. Now we see why the Southern floodgates were open.
JD
April 11, 2025 at 11:58 am
Let’s break this propaganda dumpster fire down one lie at a time because repeating talking points doesn’t make them true, no matter how many times they get echoed in your bubble.
1.) “Demos don’t support government efficiency”
False. Efficiency isn’t the same as gutting institutions to hand contracts to billionaires with conflicts of interest. Democrats have historically streamlined government through tech upgrades (see Obama’s US Digital Service), accountability initiatives, and anti-corruption efforts. Wanting to fund essential services isn’t the opposite of efficiency, it’s called functionality.
2.) “They support men playing and dominating women’s sports”
False and designed to distract. The actual policy discussions are about how to handle rare edge cases involving transgender athletes which should be nuanced, science-informed, and respect both fairness and human dignity. But nuance doesn’t trend on outrage media, so here we are.
3.) “Dems support rioting, defacing, burning, looting if they don’t get their way”
That’s just a lie. Democratic leaders consistently condemned violence during protests. You know who didn’t? The folks cheering on the literal storming of the Capitol on January 6. Peaceful protest is protected under the Constitution, the same one many people only seem to like when it fits their narrative.
4.) “Dems support gang bangers, drug dealers, human traffickers that are illegals in this country”
That’s straight-up racist fear-mongering. Democrats support immigration reform which includes border security, pathways to citizenship, and yes, enforcement. The GOP blocked bipartisan immigration bills because they’d rather use the border as a campaign ad than solve the problem.
5.) “Dems support voting for everyone without proof of citizenship”
Nope. It’s illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, and Democrats haven’t changed that. Voter ID laws sound simple, but they’re often crafted to suppress turnout among the poor, elderly, and students, all legal voters. There’s a real conversation to be had, but this isn’t it.
“Now we see why the Southern floodgates were open.”
Again immigration is complicated. But framing asylum seekers and immigrants as an “invasion” is the same rhetoric used in manifestos of white supremacist mass shooters. If that’s your go-to phrasing, maybe rethink your sources.
This isn’t a binary choice between open borders and no borders, riots vs. law and order, or corruption vs. chaos. Real governance.
You want to argue policy? Cool. But this isn’t it, this is just culture war noise dressed up as concern.
Come on Helmet. Let’s do better.
JD
April 11, 2025 at 2:44 pm
What? No response? I figured as much. It’s because you got nothing when confronted with facts, logic, and moralities.
I am tired of the propaganda.
PeterH
April 11, 2025 at 12:58 pm
Yes indeed! Think about this for a second! Americans are relying on the fiscal intelligence of a collection of low GDP red state republicans to magically be economic wizards! What could possibly go wrong? 🤡