Plaintiffs in redistricting case lambaste lawmakers
State Sen. Bill Galvano speaks during a redistricting debate. File photo.

redistricting - bill galvano

Florida legislators were offered a chance to fix the state’s congressional district map – and they blew it.

That’s the message sent Thursday by the plaintiffs in the 3-year-old congressional redistricting lawsuit, according to a filing with the Florida Supreme Court.

Indeed, the parties said that “faced with the Legislature’s disregard of its mandate,” the court should draw the map itself.

A 2-week special session called earlier this month ended without an agreed-upon new map that redraws Florida’s 27 congressional districts.

“This Court should reject the Senate’s invitation to take a ‘wait-and-see’ approach to whether the Legislature will suddenly resolve its differences, call another special session, and adopt a remedial plan at some unknown time in the future,” said the document filed by the League of Women Voters of Florida and Common Cause.

The House did not escape criticism, with the plaintiffs asking the court to also “reject the House’s invitation to characterize any remedial (map) as an expressly … interim or provisional plan that will remain in place only until superseded by subsequent legislation.”

“A cynic might view the House’s request as an attempt to lure this Court into agreeing in advance to legislative efforts to unwind any remedial plan after direct judicial oversight has ceased,” the filing said.

The Supreme Court had agreed with plaintiffs that the congressional districts, redrawn after the 2010 census, were “gerrymandered” to favor Republicans, the same party that controls both sides of the Capitol.

The filing noted that the court has “acknowledged that state courts are empowered to enact constitutional redistricting plans for the United States Congress when the legislature fails to do so.”

“The House has been clear that it does not anticipate that the Legislature will enact a remedial plan in advance of the 2016 elections … and the trial court likewise recognized that it appears unlikely that a Legislative plan will be provided to (it) for review, in a timely fashion,” the filing said.

“Nearly two months have been lost already, and the remaining time before the 2016 elections is far too limited— and the stakes far too high—to delay a remedy based on unjustified and speculative optimism.”

Jim Rosica

Jim Rosica is the Tallahassee-based Senior Editor for Florida Politics. He previously was the Tampa Tribune’s statehouse reporter. Before that, he covered three legislative sessions in Florida for The Associated Press. Jim graduated from law school in 2009 after spending nearly a decade covering courts for the Tallahassee Democrat, including reporting on the 2000 presidential recount. He can be reached at [email protected].



#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704