Jamie Grant-backed effort to make it harder to get citizen initiatives on the ballot clears first committee

The bill would shorten the amount of time groups can collect petitions.

The House Judiciary Committee took the first step Thursday in making it harder for Floridians to propose constitutional amendments through citizen initiation.

Rep. Jamie Grant, a Tampa Republican who chairs the committee, delivered a fiery defense of his proposed committee bill (PCB).

The bill includes several provisions including raising the threshold of voter petitions to trigger language review, transparency measures requiring disclosure of out-of-state participation and shortening the amount of time groups have to gather petitions.

The bill would also require groups pushing for a ballot initiative to pay for the signature verification process with local supervisors of elections offices.

For the 2020 ballot, groups must gather and have verified a total of 766,200 signatures to get an initiative on the ballot. That number is updated each year based on voter turnout in the previous election.

Grant’s measure would not increase the total number of petition signatures needed to make the ballot, but it would increase the threshold for triggering judicial review from 10% of the petitions gathered to 50%.

Grant’s argument is that change would save taxpayer dollars by only burdening the courts with judicial review if a ballot initiative was well on its way to the needed signatures for the ballot.

Critics, however, argued the threshold would make it difficult for groups to raise money to gather petitions.

“Until I get to 10% nobody is going to write me a big check. When I get to 10% then I can get the big checks,” said Jodi James, chair of the group Floridians for Freedom.

James is a longtime advocate in the Legislature for passing medical cannabis laws. When she hit a wall, she launched a petition effort to make it happen.

Rich Templin, legislative and political director for the AFL-CIO, further argued increasing the point at which ballot language is reviewed would hamper and even altogether kill group’s ability to make needed changes identified through the review process.

“10% allows you to find out deficiencies,” he said. “And you have time to go back to the drawing board. Under this if there’s a problem you’re done.”

The bill creates further challenges to citizen proposed constitutional amendments by reducing the amount of time petition gatherers have to rally support. Currently signatures are valid for two years. Under the proposed bill, those signatures would only be valid until Feb. 1 of even numbered years.

Grant argued that still gives gatherers almost two years — they could start gathering petitions after one even-year election. But those elections are in November meaning petition efforts would start in December, making the window 14 months.

However, that timeline does not consider that supervisors of elections have 30 days to verify signatures. That means groups pushing for a ballot initiative would actually have a Jan. 1 deadline or risk having some of its petitions uncounted. Taking that under consideration, the timeline is closer to 13 months.

Grant admitted he thinks it should be “really hard to amend the constitution.” And he offered a passionate explanation as to why that included several points.

First, he worries voters at the ballot box might not have all of the information needed to make a decision on a law that would likely affect them for their entire lives.

He also argued for maintaining the state’s representative democracy.

“The constitution should be owned by the citizens of Florida,” he said.

But in some cases, Grant argued, out of state special interest groups come in with multimillion dollar efforts to amend or add to the state constitution.

His bill would address that by requiring disclosure of out-of-state fundraising and petitioning.

Templin rejected that argument, arguing instead that efforts to make ballot initiatives harder have had the opposite effect of what lawmakers originally intended when efforts began a decade ago.

At one point, petition signatures were valid indefinitely. That was later amended to eight years, then to four and eventually to two. The idea, Templin said, was to ensure the constitution was controlled by Floridians, not deep pocketed special interests.

“None of that has changed, but what we did with those changes is we actually took the process away from the people and made it now a wholly owned process by the millionaires and billionaires,” Templin said. “No one can collect those [signatures] with volunteers anymore.”

Groups are forced to pay petition gatherers, buy direct mail to collect signatures and wage full on campaigns to earn support and get the message out.

Support for Grant’s bill fell along party lines with Republicans supporting and Democrats decrying it as a withering of democracy.

The bill’s next stop has yet to be determined.

A similar bill in the Senate (SB 778) has not been heard in committee yet.

The bill is ambiguous as to how it would or would not affect existing ballot initiatives, most specifically the Make It Legal Florida effort to take an adult-use cannabis question to voters. Grant said his intent in the bill is that it would not affect existing petition drives.

If it were to be applied retroactively it would foil Make It Legal’s goal to have its initiative placed on the 2022 ballot and require the group to restart its petition drive after the November election.

Janelle Irwin Taylor

Janelle Irwin Taylor has been a professional journalist covering local news and politics in Tampa Bay since 2003. Most recently, Janelle reported for the Tampa Bay Business Journal. She formerly served as senior reporter for WMNF News. Janelle has a lust for politics and policy. When she’s not bringing you the day’s news, you might find Janelle enjoying nature with her husband, children and two dogs. You can reach Janelle at [email protected].


  • Sam

    January 16, 2020 at 3:10 pm

    This is simply a turf war that can have big money implications and that’s why it’s being fought. I agree in principle that it should be hard to change the constitution, however, given our legislature’s recalcitrance toward the citizens and its obvious pro-business/anti-consumer bias in all things, I have to take the attitude that any way to get ‘er done is fine.

  • Jan

    January 16, 2020 at 3:43 pm

    That is rich that Jamie Grant, who spoke on behalf of the Vacation Rental Management Association last year at their meeting in Orlando (see announcement below), and sponsored bills to take away local control of short-term rentals last legislative session, is now bemoaning, this…”But in some cases, Grant argued, out of state special interest groups come in with multimillion dollar efforts to amend or add to the state constitution.”

    How about the $1 million Airbnb provided to the legislators in 2017, and the additional $250,000 they just gave them? I don’t hear Grant concerned about that…but that’s because he spoke on behalf of the VRMA last year (here’s their announcement)

    Join Us For A Conversation With:

    State Representative Mike LaRosa

    State Representative Jamie Grant

    Lori Killinger, The Florida VRMA Lobbyist/Legislative Counsel

    If You Are An Owner, Manager, Or A Realtor That Rents Or Sells Vacation Rentals, This Is A Must Attend Show & Legislative Session.

    (Of note is that Lori Killinger, the VRMA lobbyist, is the author of the original legislation in 2011 that opened up your community to short term vacation rentals. She has publicly acknowledged this fact in open testimony before various committees.)

    Jamie Grant should represent his constituents, not the vacation rental industry.

  • Chase Grossen

    January 16, 2020 at 4:23 pm

    This is such a transparent, garbage move. How dare anyone other than the legislature participate in the legislative process? As we all know, most amendments originate from the legislature – maybe they are the ones that need to be reigned in.

    But in the end, sadly, these moves insure ONLY extremely wealthy groups will be able to get items on a ballot.

  • gary

    January 17, 2020 at 1:34 pm

    Makes sense.. In order for the constitution to be changed, it should take more than a small minority too trigger a review! Why should a small minority cause the waste of taxpayer dollars???????

  • Bill Tellefsen

    January 20, 2020 at 1:37 pm

    Anybody ever stop to think how little the senators and representatives actually represent us citizens? It’s money that they listen to, not the people they represent. When is the last time any politician asked you how you felt about any issue at all? All they ask you for is a contribution to their campaign funds. We wouldn’t need petitions if they just asked enough of us questions. Once they get elected we become students of Ignore U.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704