Florida courts struggle to collect fines owed by ex-felons

ryan cherry ex-felon voting
“I never knew I had fines and court costs until I did a bunch of research."

After serving two stints in Florida prison in the 1990s for felony theft and cocaine possession, Ryan Cherry returned home to his family in Orlando to start his own air conditioning business.

Cherry, 48, tried to register to vote after Florida voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2018 restoring the voting rights of ex-felons, but then learned he still owed more than $300 in court fines and fees. Until those were paid, it would still be illegal under Florida law for him to vote. Provisions of that law are in dispute as part of a pending federal lawsuit.

“I never knew I had fines and court costs until I did a bunch of research,” Cherry said. He said he never received letters, calls or internet notices from a collection agency about his overdue balance and said he could not find any record of it online. Without Cherry’s subsequent efforts, spurred by his desire to vote, it’s unlikely the fees and fines in his case ever would have been repaid.

A new government study shows Florida courts have a difficult job collecting fees and fines in criminal cases. Those failures now have a direct impact on the ability of ex-felons to vote in future elections after they serve their prison sentences.

Of more than $315 million in fines and fees assessed in 2017 and 2018, the study by the Florida Legislature’s Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability found that state circuit courts, where most criminal cases are adjudicated, collected less than 10% of the money owed. County courts collected just under 40% of money owed.

In Orange County, which includes Orlando where Cherry lives, the circuit court collected about 11% of the $12.8 million in fines and fees that criminals owed. In Hillsborough County, which includes Tampa, the circuit court collected about 8%. Miami-Dade’s circuit court collected about 13%. Duval County, which includes Jacksonville, collected about 4%.

“We are continually working to improve on ways to make it easier for people to come into compliance with their outstanding court fines and fees,” Orange County Circuit Court spokesman Dain Wester said.

Clerk of Courts Tiffany Moore Russell was aware of the low collection rates, Wester said. He added that the court waives the 25% surcharge once a year on amounts turned over to collection agencies to encourage repayment.

In the private sector, collection rates vary widely by industry. Doctors and hospitals have collected nearly 40% of delinquent debt, and lenders have collected as much as 25% of overdue student loans, according to research by the Association of Credit and Collection Professionals, a Minneapolis-based trade group for debt collection companies. But government agencies have collected roughly 10% of overdue debts, which is close to the averages that Florida courts are now collecting.

Florida’s circuit courts face the additional challenges of collecting hundreds or thousands in fines or fees owed by ex-felons, whose criminal records can interfere with finding a job. The situation is worse for convicts with mental health problems or who abuse drugs.

“Once you have a felony arrest on your record, it’s almost impossible to rent an apartment, buy a car, get any credit,” said Gil Singer, a partner at the Tampa-based Marcadis Singer law firm, which represents lenders and creditors but does no work for Florida courts. “They can’t afford to pay. They don’t get into jobs that give them the ability to repay these things. It’s as simple as that.”

Singer said the court collection rates were “not terrible,” considering those circumstances.

The outstanding amounts of overdue debt owed by criminals in Florida hints at the scope of the simmering legal and political dispute that could affect who wins the 2020 presidential election. Civil liberties groups are suing in federal court over a Florida law that requires ex-felons to pay all fines and fees before they can vote, even after their release from prison.

“What this really comes down to is saying you have to pay to vote, and that’s plain wrong,” said Micah Kubic, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, one of the groups suing.

The outcome of the legal case could decide whether tens of thousands of ex-felons in Florida can vote in November. In 2016, President Donald Trump won the state by fewer than 113,000 votes. He established residency in Florida last year and regularly visits his Palm Beach resort.

Unpaid fines and fees create a “nearly inescapable cycle of disenfranchisement,” Kubic said.

In Orlando, Cherry said his felony convictions discouraged employers from hiring him. He started his own air conditioning business to earn a living. And the difficulty that Cherry experienced figuring to whom he owed money and how much wasn’t unusual.

In an early ruling in the federal case, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle in Tallahassee noted there is no centralized office tracking fines and fees across courts in Florida’s 67 counties. Amounts owed in older court cases can be especially difficult to determine because court records might not be immediately available.

Cherry enlisted help from a prisoner advocacy group, the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, to determine how much he owed. The coalition paid his fines and fees after Thanksgiving. Cherry registered as a Democrat and plans to vote in the March presidential primary and November’s general election.

“Everyone should be able to vote,” he said. “It seems like it’s designed to keep us held back.”


Republished with permission of The Associated Press.

Associated Press


  • gary

    February 11, 2020 at 12:00 pm


    But lets trust with the civic duty of voting! Dumb demoRATS!

  • Christopher Kennard

    February 11, 2020 at 1:18 pm

    The refusal of the Trump-DeSantis team of co-conspirators to effectively rescind the right of felons to have their right to vote restored, which Florida voters approved by a large majority in the 2018 election by 64% of the vote, was to suppress the vote in Florida so Trump would “win” the 2020 election like he “won” the 2016 election.

    Moveover, the Florida HB-5 law, made effective immediately after the 4th of July in 2019, eviscerated the ability and therefore the right of Florida citizen’s to use ballot initiative petitions, signed by voters to vote at the ballot box on Election Day, to create or change, then approve and enact state constitutional laws which politicians have repeatedly refuse to do.

    The dual purpose of the fast track timing of the HB-5 law was first and foremost, to reduce (or suppress) the number of progressive or liberal voters coming to vote in 2020, again, so Trump could “win” the election, similar to how he “won” the 2016 election.

    Secondly, HB-5 was enacted to stop a number of very popular progressive issue petitions from reaching the required number to allow Florida voters to vote to approve these proposed new state laws that Republican politicians oppose. Once a state constitutional amendment law, it is more difficult for politicians to meddle with, delay or outright deny.

    In addition to the citizens of Florida loosing their right to use state ballot initiative petitions to create laws under which we chose to live with and abide by and Michigan, Utah, North and South Dakota also had their state ballot initiative petition processes eviscerated, denying these citizens their right to bypass unresponsive politicians to create laws they favor or to amend or end laws which with do not agree.

    This shredding of America’s citizens state constitutional rights to make and vote to enact new laws or amend or end old laws in a planned concertive national level also violates our U.S. Constitutional rights and at this point, threatens further losses of our citizenry’s constitutional rights on the state and federal level.

    The only proper, corrective response must arise from the people themselves, once more, as certainly occurred during the 1960 – 1970’s Civil Rights and Peace Movement era, as well as during FDR’s time during the Great Depression, when the people arose out into the streets to take matters more into their hands; by their presence becoming “known”, their raised voices heard, their votes, individually cast, collectively counted, to meet the required majority vote to resolve the pressing issues of the day.

    This seems to be where we are today. Forming a people’s peaceful progressive “political revolution” to create, foster and expedite positive, productive change for us all . . . all of us!

  • Scott King

    February 11, 2020 at 2:05 pm

    Court costs and restitution are not a burden that should be absorbed by the general public or victims of a crime when criminals caused the burden in the first place. Restoration of voting rights are something I’m all for, once your debt to society has been paid in full. It’s unfortunate that this legislation was mishandled by being put to the voters without properly addressing this issue first.

  • Mr Eric Sanchez

    February 11, 2020 at 5:41 pm

    Do you need a loan?All types of loans are borrowed at an interest rate of 3% Business Loan,Personal Loan Car Loan in ranges from a minimum of $5000 and maximum to $100,000,000.00 with a term of 1 year to 30 years. So if you are in need a loan contact us at : [email protected] for more Information.

    Mr Eric Sanchez

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704