Social welfare made Sweden’s coronavirus recovery easier, but Florida Republicans don’t want you to know that
A coronavirus spinning with Sweden flag behind as epidemic outbreak infection in Sweden

Corona Virus Outbreak with Sweden Flag Coronavirus Concept
The policies conservatives bemoan as socialist propaganda, are what gave Sweden flexibility.

Many conservatives across the United States and in Florida have latched on to the idea that Sweden hit a home run with its coronavirus response despite the nation’s lack of social distancing mandates.

The European nation allowed restaurants to remain open, as long as social distancing efforts were in place. Schools remained in session. Residents could still get a hair cut. Things Floridians and many Americans were robbed of in favor of public health went relatively untouched in Sweden.

I won’t even get to the irony that right-wing Republicans went from loathing Sweden as a Bernie Sanders socialists’ wet dream only to turn around and view the nation as its shining light in pandemic policy. That low-hanging fruit is too easy and too obvious.

What’s truly astonishing about the infatuation with Sweden is its blatant disregard for the political norms that make Sweden a ripe candidate for trusting common sense compared to the political climate in the U.S., and especially Florida, that made stay-at-home orders and forced closures an absolute necessity.

The very same policies conservatives bemoan as socialist propaganda, are what gave Sweden the flexibility to be able to remain open.

The country has some of the world’s most robust unemployment and paid family leave benefits and residents have access to universal health care.

Because of their government’s strong social welfare programs, Swedes didn’t need to be told to stay home. They just did. Why? They had more to lose by leaving their homes than they did by staying home.

If they got sick — not even like, coronavirus deathbed sick — they could stay home and know they’d still get paid. They could go to a doctor because they knew doing so wouldn’t potentially bankrupt them. If they needed to stay home to care for a family member, no biggie; family leave’s got you covered.

And if they lost their job, the country had their back there, too. Swedes are entitled to nearly a year of unemployment benefits with a cap of 80% of their former salary, after which the Swedish government’s job guarantee program  would kick in.

Compare that to Florida and it’s no wonder the strong arm of government was needed to ensure the curve was flattened.

In 2019, 13% of Floridians were uninsured, according to the United Health Foundation’s America’s Health Rankings. That’s not even counting the Floridians who are underinsured thanks to the prevalence of junk health policies available under conservative-driven Obamacare rollbacks.

If one of those uninsured has a dry cough but can otherwise function, you think they’re going to go to a doctor to find out what’s up? Probably not.

A lot of those uninsured or underinsured remain that way because they either didn’t have a job or they worked in a job that didn’t carry employer-sponsored health care — the same type of jobs that are unlikely to offer paid sick leave.

Are those people going to stay home for the public good at the risk of not being able to feed their family or pay their rent. Again, probably not.

If Florida Republicans want Florida to behave more like Sweden on pandemic policies, perhaps they should behave more like Sweden on social welfare policies.

I’m looking at you Rep. Anthony Sabatini who actually suggested that because Florida bars remained closed, there has “never been a better time to open a speakeasy.” And to you, House Speaker Jose Oliva who had a penchant for sharing conspiracy-laden blog posts about the virus to make the point that government-mandated shutdowns were the equivalent to “economic suicide.”

It would be hilarious if it weren’t so sad. See, what these two, and others like them, have done is make the case for a “socialist” government they hate so much.

They want to have their cake and eat it too. But it doesn’t work like that. Had Sweden not had the robust social safety net programs it has, it would have needed the same mandates Florida employed.

And if Florida wants to go Sweden’s route, they need to have those safety nets.

There’s also a very basic math calculous these Republicans are ignoring. Sweden is nearly three times the size of Florida with less than half its population. Its lack of density serves as its own social distancing mechanism. Sweden also lacks Florida’s booming tourism industry, which paved the way for the virus’ initial spread through various communities at its numerous international airports and massive cruise industry.

The sad thing is, die hard conservatives who look to constitutional conservatives for all the answers even if there’s a lack of data, evidence or science, will absorb the tweets and Fox News zingers and view that as all the reason they need to ignore the actual experts.

If we don’t make them stay home, they won’t.

Fortunately for Floridians, there are Republicans in this state who, even if Democrats loathe them, really do listen to the experts. For all of the grief I’ve given Gov. Ron DeSantis, his Phase One reopening plan was measured and cautious.

Does it suck to have to wait a little longer for a haircut? Sure does. But until Florida becomes the political equivalent of Sweden, this is the stuff you guys signed up for, whether you realized it or not.

Suck it up, buttercups.

Peter Schorsch

Peter Schorsch is the President of Extensive Enterprises and is the publisher of some of Florida’s most influential new media websites, including Florida Politics and Sunburn, the morning read of what’s hot in Florida politics. Schorsch is also the publisher of INFLUENCE Magazine. For several years, Peter's blog was ranked by the Washington Post as the best state-based blog in Florida. In addition to his publishing efforts, Peter is a political consultant to several of the state’s largest governmental affairs and public relations firms. Peter lives in St. Petersburg with his wife, Michelle, and their daughter, Ella.


9 comments

  • Michael j Shinosky

    May 9, 2020 at 5:46 am

    You got it wrong. Sweden has to stay open or their system would crash. All those social programs depend on business as usual. You know it and I know it. No work no taxes. Stop being so unbalanced in your argument. Makes you look weak.

  • Steve Vernon

    May 9, 2020 at 7:52 am

    FREEDOM was the reason for Sweden’s success in combating Covid-19, not SOCIALISM.
    Peter, you’re showing your true colors and they aren’t red, white & blue.

  • Sonja Fitch

    May 9, 2020 at 10:07 am

    Goptrump cult are dangerous white men after the MONEY!

    • Lisa Smith

      May 9, 2020 at 10:47 am

      Who do you think is paying for all of that? Those with jobs!

      • Wolf

        May 9, 2020 at 11:58 am

        Using only numbers from the Swedish CDC and their coveted ICU survival rate, simple arithmetic proves, beyond all doubt, that 90% of those dying in Sweden from covid-19 received NO ICU care. This is how they are managing the crisis. The suffering is contained mostly to now-locked down elder care facilities.

  • WiliWali

    May 9, 2020 at 10:40 am

    The article also failed to mention Sweden’s tight border control policies and minimal tourists trade this time of year. Not exactly a well balanced article.

  • Dave Jansen

    May 9, 2020 at 1:42 pm

    I agree with your well-balanced editorial

  • Jimmie T Smith

    May 10, 2020 at 8:10 pm

    I think the most of important fact you missed is that Republicans and the swedish government both correctly state that the swedish government supports a free market economy, that has made them financially secure.

    That they can afford their program because of business success, as well as the extremely low abuse of the system.

    But even with that, they didn’t say stay home and so they won’t be affected economically as much or need their unemployment system.

  • ctee

    May 14, 2020 at 2:45 pm

    Good opinion piece – thanks for this!

    And thanks also for providing us with that conservative/libertarian spin, guys. Good to know what to expect coming down the R-wing pipeline.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704