The Florida Rights Restoration Coalition is putting an additional $1.5 million into Hillsborough County to pay off outstanding fines and fees for former felons.
So far, the Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts office has helped more than 800 returning citizens regain the right to vote, which was accomplished using $750,000 the coalition had already sent Hillsborough’s way. The announcement of new money came on the voter registration deadline for the Nov. 3 election. That means the $1.5 million won’t help returning citizens vote in the upcoming presidential election, but could help them in future elections. At the current rate of of payoffs, that means new money could help some 1,600 returning citizens.
The organization, which is dedicated to restoring the right to vote to people with convictions and improve the reentry system, has so far collected upwards of $25 million from people across the country, Desmond Meade, the executive director of the coalition, said at a news conference Monday.
“We believe not only in advocating on behalf of people with prior felony convictions, but doing so in a way that benefits everybody,” Meade said. “This is a win, win, win situation.”
At the conference, which took place in front of the Hillsborough County Courthouse, Meade presented the county’s Clerk of Court Pat Frank with the check for $1.5 million.
“We have roads still to travel,” Frank said. “All we want to do is give them the right to be a full citizen – to be a dignified, full citizen.”
The coalition has so far written checks to help pay felon fines and fees to 60 of Florida’s 67 counties.
This announcement follows a decision from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled the state could require felons to pay fines, restitution and legal fees before they can regain their right to vote.
Although ultimately the Supervisor of Elections and the Secretary of State are responsible for determining a person’s eligibility to vote, the Clerk is responsible for collecting balances due.
The recent ruling by the Atlanta-based appeals court overturned a district judge’s ruling, which said the state cannot deny the right to vote to felons who are “genuinely unable to pay” court-ordered debts.
Floridians already voted on the issue with 64% voting in favor of a 2018 constitutional amendment that restored non-violent felon voting rights after they completed their sentences. The legal dispute arose after lawmakers looked to define what it means to complete a sentence, siding with the state that returning felons must satisfy all court fines and fees and restitution before rights are restored.
“When we passed Amendment 4, we had over 5.1 million people that said yes to second chances,” Meade said.
About a third of the state’s 1.4 million convicted felons who are unable to vote are Black. If all 1.4 million eligible former felons registered to vote, they would make up roughly 10% of the voting population in the state, according to ABC news.
Clerk-elect Cindy Stuart, who will replace Frank in January, vowed to continue the office’s work on rights restoration when she takes office.
One comment
Ian
October 5, 2020 at 6:08 pm
From the Article:
Floridians already voted on the issue with 64% voting in favor of a 2018 constitutional amendment that restored non-violent felon voting rights after they completed their sentences.
Reality:
Kelly, we went over this just the other day. Looks like you cut-and-pasted the same erroneous material from that story into this one.
Please stop falsely telling your readers that Amendment 4 (A4) restores non-violent felon voting rights. Only murderers and sex offenders are excluded from A4. All other violent felons can get their voting rights restored under A4, including those convicted of kidnapping, attempted murder, assault and battery, domestic violence, assault with a deadly weapon, and any other violent felony aside from murder or a sex offense. I would think you’d want to stop misinforming your readers, just so you can be a good reporter. Is there some other reason you’re still making this error?
Also, where your story says “after they completed their sentences,” it should read “after they completed all terms of their sentences.” That’s the language that appears in A4, and it was the focus of the big lawsuit, before the appellate court correctly ruled that “all” really does mean “all.” You do your readers a disservice to leave that out.
You’re welcome.
Comments are closed.