Senate panel OK’s bill that could limit snowbird access to Citizens Insurance coverage

Estate agent broker giving pen to client signing agreement contract real estate with approved mortgage application form, buying or concerning mortgage loan offer for and house insurance
The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee wants to make it harder for snowbirds to access Citizens.

Florida legislators are taking another crack at trying to blunt the growth of the state-created Citizens Property Insurance by targeting snowbirds as well as the agents who sell policies from the insurer of last resort.

The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee Tuesday unanimously approved SB 186 without debate. The bill would also potentially subject Citizens customers to higher surcharges if the large carrier is hit with huge losses associated with hurricanes.

Under the Senate bill it would become harder for seasonal residents and visitors to maintain Citizens insurance coverage if they are using it for vacation homes that are not their primary residences.

This ensures that the benefits of you and I subsidizing policyholders goes to people that actually live primarily in Florida and not out-of-state tourists,” said Sen. Jeff Brandes, a St. Petersburg Republican and sponsor of the legislation, who noted that one-third of Citizens customers were not covering their main residence.

Despite Brandes’ suggestion, Florida taxpayers are not currently subsidizing Citizens, but they have in the past including in the aftermath of eight hurricanes slamming the state in 2004 and 2005.

The size of Citizens is worrisome to the state’s powerful insurance industry because if the carrier can’t pay off its claims, it could ultimately result in surcharges being placed on both Citizens customers as well as on all sorts of other insurance policies held by other Floridians, including auto insurance. Critics have called this a “hurricane tax.”

There are now nearly 760,000 policyholders in Citizens — many of them living in South Florida and near the coast — and top officials with the insurer have warned they continue to grow amid problems with other Florida insurers. Insurance Commissioner David Altmaier last fall called the situation “dire” and said homeowners in Florida were likely to keep seeing their insurance rates go up.

The bill passed by the Senate committee would require seasonal residents to shift their coverage from Citizens to a private company if the private carrier offers a rate that is 20% or lower than the rate charged by Citizens.

The legislation also would increase the surcharge charged to Citizens customers in the event of claims wiping out its reserves, but it would be tied to the overall size of the insurer. For example, if Citizens had 1 million or more policyholders, the surcharge would rise from 15% to 20%. The bill also puts limits on how much agents who sell Citizens policies can earn in commissions.

Legislators last year also changed the law in an effort to entice homeowners to leave Citizens by allowing it to increase the amount in rate hikes the insurer’s board can request each year. Rate hikes had been capped at 10% per year, but lawmakers in 2021 agreed to adjust the cap so that it will eventually be capped at 15% a year by 2026.

Florida has spent the last three decades grappling with shocks in its insurance marketplace ever since Hurricane Andrew swept through South Florida. The effort eventually led to the creation of Citizens, which has seen its number of policyholders ebb and flow depending on what is happening with private insurance carriers.

Christine Jordan Sexton

Tallahassee-based health care reporter who focuses on health care policy and the politics behind it. Medicaid, health insurance, workers’ compensation, and business and professional regulation are just a few of the things that keep me busy.

One comment

  • Allen McGinniss

    February 3, 2022 at 9:47 am

    Hi Christine!

    In the insurance world, carriers collect premiums against future projected losses. The statement “… Florida taxpayers are not currently subsidizing Citizens…” is incorrect, but completely understandable for how one could come to that conclusion. Citizens actuaries themselves says it’s not collecting enough to pay future claims. Meaning, even though we’re not literally writing the checks, realizing the losses, for it today through assessments, we WILL and the only question is will it be this year, next year, 10+ years from now and exactly how much will it actually be.
    Every dollar under the actual amount needed to be collected for the risk, is being subsidized. It’s just not yet being realized. And the bad part about that is, people wont know exactly how that affects them, until it’s already happened and too late.

    We are subsidizing Citizens today (and have been). We just have not realized the losses yet that WILL happen unless changes are made to citizens property ins corp by the State of FL.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Daniel Figueroa, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Joe Henderson, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Mike Wright, and Tristan Wood.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn