Federal appeals court upholds Florida’s post-Parkland ban on under-21 gun buys

guns maine ap
'The fact that there was apparently only a single challenge to these twenty statutes’ constitutionality until well into the twentieth century suggests that the public understanding at the time of the ratification considered the statutory prohibitions constitutionally permissible.'

Florida’s law passed in the wake of the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland in 2018 that prohibits the sale of rifles and long guns to people under the age of 21 remains in effect after a federal appeals court upheld the law.

A unanimous three-judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals found the law didn’t violate the Second Amendment, as the National Rifle Association and Radford Fant, the son of former Jacksonville Republican Rep. Jay Fant, contended when they brought the suit shortly after the bill took effect in 2018.

In the ruling, the judges stated they were following the precepts in an opinion issued last year by the U.S. Supreme Court that governments seeking to regulate firearms must show the law “is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

The Thursday decision pointed to a slew of bans on small arms and weapons for those under 21 by states in the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era. Those bans were unchallenged for decades, the ruling noted.

“The fact that there was apparently only a single challenge to these twenty statutes’ constitutionality until well into the twentieth century suggests that the public understanding at the time of the ratification considered the statutory prohibitions constitutionally permissible,” the ruling states.

Moreover, Florida’s 2018 law only bans the sale of long guns to those between 18 and 21 (a previous law banned the sale of handguns to those under 21), and doesn’t prevent young adults from acquiring a weapon as a gift or a loan, the judges found. That means the law isn’t as restrictive as the Reconstruction Era laws.

“Unlike those laws, the Act leaves 18-to-20-year-olds free to acquire firearms of any legal type — so long as they don’t buy them,” the ruling states.

The judges on the case were Robin Rosenbaum, Charles Wilson and Anne Conway. Wilson was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, and Rosenbaum was appointed by former President Barack Obama. Conway is a U.S. District Court judge of the Middle District of Florida, sitting on the case “by designation,” the ruling states. Conway was appointed by former President George H.W. Bush.

Wilson agreed with the opinion but wrote a concurrence noting he preferred to delay the ruling to see if the Legislature would pass HB 1543, which would repeal the ban on 18-21 gun purchases during its 60-day Regular Session, slated to end May 5.

Gray Rohrer


2 comments

  • Sandra

    March 10, 2023 at 10:01 am

    It’s rather nonsensical that a disturbed youth could argue that his gun was a gift rather than a purchase. He still can kill a class full of children. This bill does nothing to end the killing fields.

  • TD

    March 12, 2023 at 12:42 am

    Amazing how the fundamental rights issues (abortion, guns, right to leave your house, right to control what goes into your own body) bring out the weakest reasoning from such idiots.

    No one brought a challenge before, so that means the right never existed, and too bad for your challenge today! Please. That literally turns the standard on its head – the Supreme Court directed the focus to the history of GOVERNMENT regulation, not the history of public challenge to government regulation. Thus, the lack of regulation displacing the God-given natural right to self-defense that otherwise existed is what is dispositive.

    18 year-olds shouldn’t buy guns and never had the right to do so? Tell it to James Monroe, who crossed the Delaware to kill Brits with Washington at age 18. No sense of history, whatsoever.

    But no worries, we’ll look back to Reconstruction, when ex-Confederate whites were running scared of blacks with guns, because it fits our narrative, but not look any further than that, to all of the contrary evidence. While we’re at it, we’ll pretend that the age of majority hasn’t continually been delayed (from 14, 16, 18, 21, to now effectively as high as 25 etc) for sociopolitical reasons that would also conflict with a narrative that no gun rights ever existed for people under 21.

    Politicians need to ban gift exchanges? Just keep ratcheting the state leftward into mediating every life interaction, you dolt. That’s where your liberal ideology leads but you’re too dense to realize it.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704