Flag restrictions backed by Ron DeSantis stall in Senate

jonathan martin
The sponsor postponed consideration of the bill because he had another committee to get to.

Momentum has stalled when it comes to removing potentially controversial flags from government buildings.

Perhaps it was a matter of time.

SB 1120, a bill by Republican Sen. Jonathan Martin, failed to advance through the Governmental Oversight and Accountability committee because he had to get to another committee and asked the bill be temporarily postponed in the middle of overwhelming public opposition to his piece of legislation.

Martin’s measure holds that a “governmental entity may not erect or display a flag that represents a political viewpoint, including, but not limited to, a politically partisan, racial, sexual orientation and gender, or political ideology viewpoint. The governmental entity must remain neutral when representing political viewpoints in displaying or erecting a flag.”

The bill is supposed to “unite … everybody, regardless of who they have sex with, regardless of what country they’re from,” Martin said.

The Florida flag and the U.S. flag would be permissible under the current language, and Martin said he’d be amenable to city flags being added as well. He also said foreign flags, such as the Israeli flag, could be added as a sign of geopolitical support.

The bill would apply to flags inside buildings yet outside their offices as currently written, he added.

It would include a ban on Pride flags and Confederate flags at government buildings as well, Martin said.

However, an image of a Confederate flag as part of a statue would still be acceptable, he said, which jibes with his monument protection bill that is also moving in the Senate (and House) as Black History Month continues.

Martin’s bill also would permit military veterans to use “reasonable force” to stop a flag from being torn down, a condition not in the current House product (HB 901). He said protests in New York City inspired this language.

Why the carve out for veterans? Because they care more than civilians, the sponsor claimed.

“That means more to the veterans than to somebody like myself who didn’t serve in the military,” Martin claimed, citing former baseball player Rick Monday taking a flag from a burner on the field nearly 50 years ago.

Asked if this was a “citizens’ arrest” scenario by Democratic Sen. Tina Polsky, Martin said the bill didn’t justify assault, but did give vets leeway to protect “a government flag on government property.” He went on to note that the language gives vets recourse to defend the American flag only.

Some members of the public were unhappy with the proposal before Martin tapped out for the day, with numerous speakers saying flags in schools and government buildings let marginalized communities know they had allies, with others saying the bill was simply about “control and subjugation.”

Equality Florida’s Joe Saunders said “the intention of the bill is to target one community: my community.”

Lola Smith, a 13-year-old nonbinary student from Southwest Florida, said she’d “rather be in math class” than being forced to defend her identity.

“It’s hard to be queer in public school,” Smith said, noting many of her queer classmates had no “safe space” outside of her, which put a “ton of pressure” on her “at a young age.”

Mary Akins Durant, a native Floridian from Miami, noted she had to see Confederate flags regularly growing up.

“What killed the bill last year is that you wanted to protect the Confederate flag,” Durant said, calling the bill a “solution in search of a problem” and noting the Israeli flag was given equal prominence with the American flag in the Governor’s Office.

John Labriola of the Christian Family Coalition of Florida was up on the bill, meanwhile, as a bulwark against “activist teachers pushing indoctrination.”

He said the Pride flag was “deeply offensive” to people of faith, arguing that contentions otherwise amount to “gaslighting.”

Tom Nurse blasted the “poorly-drafted bill” as letting cities project flag images on buildings, saying the bill was a distraction from “really important things that need to be done” and is “about hate.”

As we reported earlier on Tuesday, the Governor is on board with the concept behind the bill.

“Well, I haven’t seen it but if you take a position that we’re going to fly the American flag and the state of Florida flag and that’s it, it’s not targeting anybody. It’s basically saying that we’re not going to get into this business of doing this. So I think that’s totally fine,” Gov. Ron DeSantis said in Orange City.

The House version has one committee stop ahead.

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has written for FloridaPolitics.com since 2014. He is based in Northeast Florida. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


8 comments

  • Michael K

    February 6, 2024 at 11:28 pm

    Has Ron not learned that attacking LGBTQ people was not a winning strateg for his failed political ambitions? What a loser.

    • Cheesy Floridian

      February 7, 2024 at 1:59 pm

      I mean this totally hits the mark on what is going to help me in my everyday life here in the good ole “Free”state of Florida. Passing laws and supporting laws that ban flags instead of taking care of a home insurance issue and rising car insurance rates.

  • Asad

    February 7, 2024 at 1:01 am

    Really helpfull

    • Cheesy Floridian

      February 8, 2024 at 4:29 pm

      Extremely

  • Cheesy Floridian

    February 7, 2024 at 1:58 pm

    Please call your local representative and let them know that THIS is not what Floridians want. We would like our tax dollars the time spent on laws that help us. Lower our home insurance, lower our car insurance, help us actually live in this state and afford to be here. This bill does none of that. This only promotes division among Floridians. I don’t care about a flag, I care about being able to live here.

  • MH/Duuuval

    February 8, 2024 at 10:15 am

    Martin’s bill also would permit military veterans to use “reasonable force” to stop a flag from being torn down, a condition not in the current House product (HB 901). “That means more to the veterans than to somebody like myself who didn’t serve in the military,” Martin claimed.

    Sounds like someone is a chicken hawk, as we used to call them during the Vietnam war.

    • MH/Duuuval

      February 8, 2024 at 10:20 am

      Chicken hawk = someone who avoids military service, yet wants others to go out and risk their lives to blow stuff up, maiming and killing and dying as long as somebody else is taking the risks.

  • Could've Should've Would've

    February 13, 2024 at 2:52 pm

    DeSantis should have resigned to run. He didn’t, but it’s never too late.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories


This is default text for notification bar