Gabrielle Russon
Attorney General Ashley Moody argued a state panel “was well within its authority” to redraft a new financial impact statement to go on the November ballot for the abortion rights initiative. She defended the statement, calling it “a model of clarity” in a 47-page response filed Friday evening.
The Amendment 4 campaign is suing over a controversial financial impact statement and has asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate it.
“Allowing this dodgy financial impact statement to stand only erodes trust in our electoral system,” Lauren Brenzel, Yes on 4’s Campaign Director, said previously.
Part of the financial impact statement reads: “The proposed amendment would result in significantly more abortions and fewer live births per year in Florida. The increase in abortions could be even greater if the amendment invalidates laws requiring parental consent before minors undergo abortions and those ensuring only licensed physicians perform abortions. There is also uncertainty about whether the amendment will require the state to subsidize abortions with public funds.”
During the Financial Impact Estimating Conference (FIEC) – which is usually a mundane group of economists – a representative from Gov. Ron DeSantis and a Heritage Foundation staffer took control of the discussion last month to approve the statement with a 3-1 majority. The state’s top economist, Amy Baker, was the only voice opposing the new statement that should be sent out to the Secretary of State’s Office to distribute to the local Supervisors of Elections to put on the ballot.
Amendment 4 seeks to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution. One new poll released this week by the University of North Florida shows the ballot initiative has enough support to hit the 60% approval threshold to pass. Amendment 4 supporters and its opponents – including Gov. Ron DeSantis – are fighting to gain any extra ground heading into the election.
When the FIEC met, Moody accused Amendment 4 of being involved in the official process and trying to sway the panel’s decision.
“… the sponsor acquiesced in the Conference’s authority and trained its attention on influencing the outcome of the revision process to produce the statement it wanted,” Moody wrote in her response. “It sent a representative to testify at all three of the FIEC’s public meetings, submitted over 70 pages of lobbying materials, and exerted public pressure on the FIEC through a press campaign.”
Moody also defended the statement, which warns if Amendment 4 passes and more people get abortions (Florida currently has a six-week abortion ban), it may hurt state and local tax revenue. How much is unknown, the panel said.
“The statement’s bottom line is that the amendment’s probable financial impact is indeterminate, a conclusion this Court approved many times,” Moody wrote.
Moody accused Amendment 4 of stalling and changing its legal strategy to fight against the financial impact statement.
Amendment 4’s deadline to respond in court is Aug. 7.
The state Supreme Court said it will expedite the case.
11 comments
MarvinM
August 2, 2024 at 9:15 pm
Oh for the love of God and YES on 4:
From the article:
“Part of the financial impact statement reads: ‘The proposed amendment would result in significantly more abortions and fewer live births per year in Florida. The increase in abortions could be even greater if the amendment invalidates laws requiring parental consent before minors undergo abortions and those ensuring only licensed physicians perform abortions. There is also uncertainty about whether the amendment will require the state to subsidize abortions with public funds.'”
The amendment specifically says the state can continue or implement any new laws regarding notifications of parents/guardians of minors seeking abortions. So that’s a non-issue. Also, how is that a fiscal impact?
I’d think the larger fiscal impact if Amendment 4 DIDN’T pass would be more women being pregnant and then qualifying for Medicaid when they didn’t before. I’d think the larger fiscal impact to the state of Florida if Amendment 4 DIDN’T pass would be more women having babies that would then qualify for Medicaid KidCare.
But somehow that’s not in their calculations, only “lawsuits” and “maybe Hyde Amendment doesn’t apply?”.
Hopefully everyone will see how ridiculous this financial impact statement is, and just vote with their gut. And people’s guts are definitely saying “Y’know, the government should not be telling us what to do and when, it’s our life and our decision”.
Vote YES on 4
Hung Wiil
August 3, 2024 at 12:02 am
God is life. You are death. You’re pathetic. Just say for the love of death and leave God out of it.
Josh Green
August 5, 2024 at 2:44 pm
God isn’t real though.
It’s a believe concept created by humans because they want something to look forward to after death, so they fool themselves into believing in nonsense.
rick whitaker
August 5, 2024 at 3:05 pm
HUNG WIIL, THERE IS NO GOD YOU FOOL! GROW UP AND QUIT BELIEVING IN FAIRY TALES.
Biscuit
August 8, 2024 at 2:11 pm
A man walks into a bar…
Suddenly you are a Man of God? After all the anger-filled, racist, bigoted, misogynist, paranoid slop you’ve been serving up in your comments?
Must’ve bumped your head hard.
Arf.
PeterH
August 3, 2024 at 3:24 am
Of course there will be more abortions in Florida. We’re surrounded by backward thinking red states with restrictive abortion policies. Women must travel somewhere to get rid of an unwanted fetus.
Nixon
August 3, 2024 at 3:47 am
Ashley Moody’s recent defense of the financial impact statement for the abortion rights initiative has stirred significant debate. While the discussion continues in the U.S., it’s interesting to consider how similar issues might be approached here https://pacikuwaitguide.com/ in Kuwait. For residents, staying informed about such matters is essential, and understanding the local impact on various policies can be as crucial as monitoring global discussions. If you need information about public services or civil documentation related to such initiatives, checking with PACI Kuwait can provide clarity and ensure you’re up-to-date with relevant regulations and procedures.
Michael K
August 3, 2024 at 7:54 am
This administration tries everything to thwart the will of the people. For an elitist who pretends to be an anti-elitist, our governor thinks he alone knows what is best for you – and he alone can decide who is “worthy” of “freedom.”
Every state that has put this on the ballot has seen women and men overwhelmingly support a woman’s right to make her own reproductive health decisions.
Our governor, the AG, and their minions must get out of the way and let the people decide. They need to stop imposing their “beliefs” on everyone else.
Jojo
August 5, 2024 at 8:04 am
Oh please Ashley… Floridians can see right through this blatant attempt to thwart the will of the people in this state.
Any initiative or amendment republicans don’t like they find some end around- witness what they did to the ability of people released from prison to vote
Once again, if they can’t win legit, they cheat
W Rose
August 5, 2024 at 12:03 pm
I am guessing the biggest direct financial impact will be the millions the state will immediately spend to invalidate or water down the law as soon as it passes. Any lost revenues will be more than made up for by women traveling here from other southern states to get abortions. Plus we already have way too much growth so it’s a win/win not to have more people born here, especially unwanted children that forced birthers never seem to consider the cost of.
Yrral
August 7, 2024 at 8:01 pm
Google Mark Robinson Keep Your Skirt Up Abortion
Comments are closed.