Lindsay Cross blasts ‘wildlife cruelty’ in proposed 2025 bear hunt, urges FWC to shoot it down

promo_BlackBear_1
At the very least, she asks that the proposal remove inhumane hunting methods.

Rep. Lindsay Cross, a St. Petersburg Democrat and an environmental scientist, is calling on the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) to vote down a proposal to open a 23-day bear hunt period in four regions across the state.

Announced in May, the proposal would allow hunting in a region of Southwest Florida, East-Central Florida south of Jacksonville and in the Gainesville area, a north region west of Jacksonville, and the eastern Panhandle west of Big Bend.

The vote is expected this week.

In a letter to FWC Commissioners, Cross took particular issue with the proposal’s inclusion of three hunting methods she described as “wildlife cruelty”: hounding, baiting and archery.

Hounding involves the use of hunting dogs that chase prey, often until they are exhausted or cornered. Critics oppose it because it can inflict extreme stress on the animal being hunted.

As the name suggests, baiting is done by placing types of feed to attract animals being hunted. Opponents say it is a risk to the environment by increasing concentrations of animals, raising the risk of spreading diseases and disrupting wildlife behavior, among other concerns.

Archery, meanwhile, is criticized as a cruel hunting method because of its risk of prolonged suffering by the hunted animal.

Cross further pointed to the last FWC-authorized bear hunt 10 years ago.

“The last bear hunt, held in October of 2015, continues to be a black stain on the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Scheduled to last a week, the 2015 hunt ended in only two days, as hunters nearly exceeded the quota and killed 36 lactating females, which undoubtedly resulted in the death of motherless cubs,” she wrote.

“Floridians are still outraged at the mismanagement and unneeded killing of one of Florida’s most iconic and beloved native mammals.”

The 2015 hunt resulted in 295 bears being taken out of the 320 that had been authorized. The total number of bears taken during the hunt was later revised upward to 304, including 38 lactating mother bears. Of the bears hunted that year, 60% were females.

FWC says the hunt is needed to manage a growing black bear population that has rebounded over the years. The agency estimates there are more than 4,000 black bears in Florida today.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” FWC wrote in an FAQ section along with its proposal.

Another section explains why some residents near bear habitats sometimes see bears in their neighborhoods, writing that despite access to habitat, “bears will take advantage of easily accessible foods that can be found in neighborhoods like unsecured garbage, pet food and bird seed.”

Cross took issue with the implication that a bear hunt is needed to avoid bear/human interactions.

“The majority of the negative interactions between the Florida black bear and humans are due to habitat encroachment and failure of humans to properly contain garbage and waste,” she wrote. She added that the Commission should instead “redirect its attention to supporting programs to reduce attractants to bears rather than green-light a trophy hunt.”

“Hundreds of millions of dollars have been dedicated to conserving and restoring habitat for native Florida wildlife, including the Florida black bear. Floridians value our native wildlife, and have spoken out loudly against this wildly unpopular hunt,” Cross continued.

“I urge you to uphold the integrity of this organization’s vision of a ‘Florida where fish and wildlife are abundant and thriving in healthy and connected natural landscapes’ and in a manner that honors the public trust by voting ‘No’ against this trophy hunt.

Janelle Irwin Taylor

Janelle Irwin Taylor has been a professional journalist covering local news and politics in Tampa Bay since 2003. Most recently, Janelle reported for the Tampa Bay Business Journal. She formerly served as senior reporter for WMNF News. Janelle has a lust for politics and policy. When she’s not bringing you the day’s news, you might find Janelle enjoying nature with her husband, children and two dogs. You can reach Janelle at [email protected].


4 comments

  • Ron Ogden

    August 11, 2025 at 4:36 pm

    It’s the old tale: science versus emotion. The left loves to beat Republicans with the cudgel of science, unleashing a barrage of studies and statistics to support their arguments about nearly any issue. This time, however, science says go ahead and hunt, and that forces the animals-first folks( they were here before us, and we are encroaching on their rights!) to resort to allegations of cruelty and to wave the milky flag of “lactating females.” Come on! Choose your side! I guess their philosophy has to match their politics. I suggest that Republicans and Democrats sit down at their local hamburger stand, chew up some quarter-pounders, and debate the morality of slaughtering cows by the thousands every day.

    Reply

  • tom palmer

    August 12, 2025 at 7:01 am

    Eating beef has nothing to do with bear hunting. This proposal is simply collateral damage from the poorly-worded right to hunt amendment that passed and the fact that FWC is still pretty much a hook and bullet agency that dares not say no to the demands of the hunting lobby. The only justification for the baiting stations was to allow hunters to figure out the bear’s sex, since females are generally smaller than males. Not sure how many of the hunters have the expertise to separate them, though. It seemed last time the hunters knew more about where the bears were than the FWC staff.

    Reply

  • Ron Ogden

    August 12, 2025 at 9:02 am

    Brutalizing animals to death for human purposes is exactly what we are talking about. Frankly, if I were either a bear able to run free on my last day or a cow confined in a suffocating carrier on the way to being electrocuted, gassed or shot in the head, I think I would choose the former.

    Reply

  • tom palmer

    August 12, 2025 at 2:22 pm

    The lactating female issue was brought up because some of the hunters killed the wrong bears and left bear cubs unprotected. Livestock are generally raised for slaughter. Which wild animals are allowed to be killed sometimes involves politics as much as “science” when it comes to the bear hunt

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, Liam Fineout, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Andrew Powell, Jesse Scheckner, Janelle Taylor, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704