Grady Judd: Taxpayers have most to lose from attack on Contraband Forfeiture Act

BILL DAY RUBIO SPEECH

Taxpayers beware: There is a dangerously naive proposal making the rounds in Tallahassee. Some politicians want to significantly damage Florida’s successful Contraband Forfeiture Act.

This is the law that prevents criminals from profiting from their illegal acts. Just like we prohibit killers from profiting by writing books about their crimes, the civil contraband forfeiture law in Florida allows law enforcement agencies to seize assets that are linked to criminal activity — with full due process protections for the accused.

Bills sponsored by Sen. Jeff Brandes, Reps. Larry Metz and Matt Caldwell (Senate Bill 1044 and House Bill 889) would make it more difficult, and sometimes impossible, to seize criminals’ illegally obtained assets.

As a result, more crooks will get to keep their ill-gotten money while you work, pay your taxes, and now will have to pay more to ensure law enforcement has the necessary tools to fight and reduce crime. Why should hard-working taxpayers pay more in taxes while criminals who sell drugs to our kids get to keep their dishonestly acquired money?

HB 889 and SB 1044 are being promoted as “reform” legislation that will protect the property rights of innocent people, but the reality is that our existing law already has extensive citizen protections built in. Don’t be misled.

Under current law, the court must find probable cause that the property was used for criminal activity in violation of the act.  Then law enforcement must prove in front of a jury (unless the defendant waives a jury trial) that the contraband article or cash was linked to a crime by clear and convincing evidence. Florida is one of 11 states that have a “clear and convincing proof standard,” which is the highest civil standard of proof and higher than most other states.

Right now, this civil forfeiture process works well and benefits the taxpayers. Law enforcement, with ample checks and balances, is able to use proceeds from forfeitures to fund school resource officers, crime prevention and safe neighborhood programs, drug abuse education and prevention programs, or for other restricted law enforcement purposes.

These resources cannot be used to meet normal operating budget expenses — proceeds are used to purchase equipment and materials that enhance law enforcement’s ability to fight crime and prevent drug abuse. These valuable resources provide taxpayers direct value by lowering the overall cost of funding law enforcement.

Why do these politicians want to change the law that is among the most effective — and protective — in the nation? It boils down to one thing: knee-jerk “anti-police” political nonsense.

Frankly, politicians don’t have to trust the police regarding civil forfeitures — trust the courts, the law and juries. There are multiple built-in protections in the civil forfeiture process that protect innocent owners of property seized during a criminal investigation.

Some legislators want to make it tougher on law enforcement and easier on criminals when it comes to contraband forfeiture.  So, unless you want to pay more taxes and let criminals keep their dirty money, please call or write your legislators and tell them you stand with law enforcement and support Florida’s successful Contraband Forfeiture Act.

***

Grady Judd is Polk County’s sheriff. Column courtesy of Context Florida.

Phil Ammann

Phil Ammann is a St. Petersburg-based journalist, editor and blogger. With more than three decades of writing, editing, reporting and management experience, Phil produced content for both print and online, in addition to founding several specialty websites, including HRNewsDaily.com. His broad range included covering news, local government and entertainment reviews for Patch.com, technical articles, and profiles for BetterRVing Magazine as well as advice columns for a metaphysical website, among others. Phil has served as editor and production manager for Extensive Enterprises Media since 2013 and lives in St. Pete with his wife, visual artist Margaret Juul. He can be reached at [email protected]


4 comments

  • Rene Ramos

    February 11, 2016 at 8:27 am

    As a norm, I support the efforts of Sheriff Judd. He is effective, if not grandiose in his law enforcement efforts. In this instance, I must disagree. I believe his statements are too self serving. It is a known fact that innocent people have had their property seized because someone decided to use it to commit a criminal act. Judd’s claim that there is due process is a joke. The Due Process he refers to is just another wall put in place to keep property in the hands of law enforcement. Property owners who do persevere suffer a loss of property value as well as the loss of money spent to recover their lawful property. Many folks just give up because of the effort and expense. Also, it is not a rare event for police to fabricate a story just to obtain property for their own benefit. Cars are impounded because a police dog sniffed the wrong way and the claim is that it smelled marijuana residue in the ash tray. By the time the car is recovered(if it ever is), it’s usually not the same as when impounded and the police aren’t held accountable. This idea of seizing property from people who have not yet been convicted of a crime is blatantly anti-American, SCOTUS rulings not withstanding. I am willing to throw my full support behind any effort to neuter this policy even if it means less money for police departments. Sheriff Judd is in danger of losing the support of his community if he continues with this view. That would be a shame.

  • Parker Brownell

    February 11, 2016 at 8:29 am

    Sheriff Judd is correct. Florida has one of the most fair versions of this law. It’s benefits far outweigh any negatives. Don’t do the crime if can’t stand the consequences.

  • Gerald Mason

    February 11, 2016 at 1:02 pm

    I can’t understand why these politicians want to do something as ridiculous as proposed in sb1044 & hb889.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Drew Dixon, Renzo Downey, Rick Flagg, A.G. Gancarski, Joe Henderson, Janelle Irwin, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Andrew Wilson, and Kelly Hayes.

Email: [email protected]
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704



This is default text for notification bar