Hillsborough Commissioner Stacy White rejects transportation plan

Screen Shot 2018-10-30 at 9.54.54 AM

Hillsborough County Commissioner Stacy White is opposing the All For Transportation tax plan that would increase sales tax 1 percent to fund transportation and transit projects countywide.

White incorrectly told ABC Action News the plan does not include road improvements that would benefit drivers: “This is not a roads plan. There is little to anything in there for the suburban commuter.”

He says the transportation referendum won’t do anything for rural commuters, especially those driving Lithia-Pinecrest Road every day. It’s in his district.

“There’s no dedicated funding source for roads so the suburban commuters you see behind me in the background, they will experience little to no benefit,” White said.

The tax would raise $280 million annually and $9 billion over its 30-year life. Of that, 54 percent would be dedicated to road and safety projects including a 20 percent allocation to widening roads and expanding capacity.

Critics say that’s actually not the case. The referendum language is intentionally vague. It does not specifically direct funds to any individual projects and instead earmarks pots of money to transit and transportation in general.

Cities and Hillsborough County would split the allocated money for road projects and an oversight committee would oversee how those funds are used. The intended projects would come from a list of priorities developed by the Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization, which includes road resurfacing, pothole repairs, added road capacity and road safety projects.

But because the language is vague, some worry that won’t end up being the case.

Supporters say the plan is a balanced measure aimed at meeting the needs of all Hillsborough County commuters whether they’re driving a personal vehicle or using public transportation.

Of the increased revenue, 45 percent would go to the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority to enhance existing countywide bus service and potentially add new transit options.

The plan has been heavily boosted by Tampa Bay Lightning owner Jeff Vinik who, through his personal wealth and affiliated businesses, has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to the referendum.

In a press conference in mid-October, White called the initiative “a trojan horse” for downtown special interests and said it “expressly prohibits” added lane capacity.

It doesn’t.

The referendum excludes new highway capacity, which is typically funded through the Florida Department of Transportation.

The plan also received backing from all three Tampa Bay major league sports teams and, most recently, the New York Yankees.

The business community also backs the plan. The Greater Tampa, South Tampa and Upper Tampa Bay chambers of commerce have all endorsed All For Transportation.

Voting is already underway. Nearly 24 percent of Hillsborough County voters have already cast a ballot.

Election Day is Nov. 6.

Janelle Irwin Taylor

Janelle Irwin Taylor has been a professional journalist covering local news and politics in Tampa Bay since 2003. Most recently, Janelle reported for the Tampa Bay Business Journal. She formerly served as senior reporter for WMNF News. Janelle has a lust for politics and policy. When she’s not bringing you the day’s news, you might find Janelle enjoying nature with her husband, children and two dogs. You can reach Janelle at [email protected].


2 comments

  • Joe Kepinger

    October 30, 2018 at 1:25 pm

    Here we go again, Janelle. I’m assuming you haven’t read the proposed charter amendment.. do you have it on hand?

    Explicitly stated in Section 11.07.(8) LIMITS ON NEW AUTOMOBILE LANE CAPACITY. “Agencies are prohibited from expending any funds from the General Purpose Portion (the percentage of tax going towards ROADS) on New Automobile Lane Capacity. For purposes of this section, ‘New Automobile Lane Capacity’ means projects that consist of (i) adding additional lanes for automobile traffic to existing roads or streets not related to intersection capacity improvement, or (ii) constructing new roads or streets.”

    So no — you can’t widen roads, and you can’t expand capacity. How can you say it doesn’t “expressly prohibit” added lane capacity when it says just that IN THE CHARTER AMENDMENT ITSELF.

    November 6th Hillsborough County voters should cast their ballot to vote you out for trash reporting.

  • Jim Davison DO

    October 30, 2018 at 1:55 pm

    The MPO made it official at this mornings meeting. The 1% sales tax plan will not improve traffic congestion from where it is today. ” Under no scenario will traffic congestion improve from where it is today. Under all scenarios the traffic will get much worse”. This is the official verdict on the sales tax plan Janelle and we have it on video. This supports what County Administrator Mike Merrill and All For Transportation Spokesperson Kevin Thurmond told the Citizens advisory committee yesterday that the sales tax plan will not decrease congestion from where it is today. The AFT plan limits new road capacity in the county making the congestion it creates worse than the MPO 2040 LRTP

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704