Undecided: Rick Scott to ‘review’ Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship proposal

Rick Scott and Luis Rivera Marín

A controversy Gov. Rick Scott likely didn’t want to deal with in the closing days of his Senate campaign: Birthright citizenship.

But on Friday, that controversy landed on Scott’s doorstep, with Sen. Lindsey Graham on the campaign trail with his fellow Republican.

The South Carolina U.S. senator is pushing a key point in President Donald Trump‘s agenda: Moving the ball forward on a re-conception of birthright citizenship as established in the 14th Amendment, vowing legislation on that front.

Trump has signaled a willingness to test the long-held interpretation with an executive order nullifying birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants born in the United States.

A strong base play, to be sure.

Yet for Scott, who has performed a complicated tango with Trump since the 2016 campaign, this controversy clouds the closing message.

The base-riling birthright citizenship issue being injected into the race distracts from more inclusive “melting pot” rhetoric that he ideally would be pushing as early voting heads into its final weekend.

Graham didn’t mention the issue in his remarks, and Scott didn’t meet with reporters afterward, removing a potential complication.

However, the Scott campaign did offer a statement after the event Friday afternoon, effectively saying he hadn’t arrived at a position yet.

“I believe legal immigration makes us a better and stronger country,” Scott said in the statement, “but illegal immigration does the opposite. I have not seen the details of what the president is suggesting and would need to fully review the proposal.”

“While I’ve been clear that Florida is a great melting pot, America’s immigration system is broken and Congress, including Sen. Nelson, has done nothing to fix the problem.

“My priorities continue to be securing the border and fixing the long-broken immigration system,” Scott added.

Scott had avoided giving reporters an answer to this question earlier in the week, but what’s clear is that any answer is fraught with potential adverse consequences.

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has been the Northeast Florida correspondent for Florida Politics since 2014. His work also can be seen in the Washington Post, the New York Post, the Washington Times, and National Review, among other publications. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


2 comments

  • Ray Tampa

    November 2, 2018 at 7:52 pm

    The man who says he likes judges who adhere strictly to the constitution is offering a statement/position that simply caters to the concerns of his pathetic buddy in the White House. Scott knows or should know that the 14th amendment is abundantly clear about citizenship.

    WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER ‘SPACE CADET’ SENATOR.

    Vote Nelson!!!

  • Frankie M.

    November 3, 2018 at 12:02 am

    If Scott were an NFL player he’d be a punter. We already have one bleak bortles. We don’t need another one.

    “A good qb can cover up alot of ills. A bad one will expose them.” Just ask big ben about his SB calibur OL over the years or the great patriot wr corps with deion branch catching passes from tom brady. We all have excuses & they all stink. Good players make their teammates better. Bad ones need to be carried.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704