Up anchor: Florida Maritime Partnership launches to protect ports, shipping
'Tooth and nail': Rep. John Rutherford vows to fight for the Jones Act. [Photo: A.G. Gancarski]

John Rutherford JAXPORT
"Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching."

Florida’s shipping industry is the second biggest in the country, and Friday saw industry leaders vowing to protect it from being subverted.

A new report sponsored by the Transportation Institute, an industry advocacy group, found that all told, shipping creates over $154 billion in total economic output and sustains over 650,000 jobs: $41 billion in annual labor income.

The Jones Act, which ensures that only American built and crewed vessels can take merchandise between two domestic ports, protects the industry: an important vouchsafe given the investment in ports in the last decade.

JAXPORT, where the principals convened Friday morning, is currently in the middle of an 13-mile dredge to 47 feet. The added depth will allow large ships through.

The first three phases of the project, which will allow ships to get to Blount Island, is estimated to cost $484 million. Thus far, federal and state money has paid for it entirely.

Principal to JAXPORT’s viability: Trade with Puerto Rico, which comprises 45 percent of container traffic. JAXPORT is the number one port for the Commonwealth.

To that end, the newly-formed Florida Maritime Partnership has emerged to protect not only JAXPORT, but other Florida ports also, from potential undermining of the Jones Act.

The libertarian Cato Institute contends that there aren’t enough American ships to move liquified natural gas to Puerto Rico, in an argument that traffic should be opened up to vessels with foreign flags.

The Governor of Puerto Rico applied for a ten-year waiver of the Jones Act to facilitate shipments. Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle oppose this; however, if such were to happen, it could hurt not just JAXPORT, but other ports of call reliant on Puerto Rico traffic as part of the business model.

Northeast Florida elected leaders from all levels of government disagree, however, and on Friday they stood with the Jones Act, and the economic interest of one of Jacksonville’s leading employers and economic engines.

Congressman John Rutherford noted that the “booming” industry was responsible for over 9,000 jobs in Northeast Florida, a theme revisited by other elected leaders on hand.

Rutherford said the Jones Act was a matter of “national security,” and vowed to “fight tooth and nail” to protect its integrity.

He rejected the need-based argument made on behalf of Puerto Rico to subvert the law, noting that “foreign vessels can sail in anytime they want from foreign ports.”

Senate Democratic Leader Audrey Gibson, representing the other side of the aisle, described the economic engine of JAXPORT evocatively.

“Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching,” Gibson said, likening the clanging noises of the increasingly active port to a cash register’s melodic tones.

Gibson lauded the “bi-partisan unity” in favor of protecting the Florida shipping sector from foreign competition.

The Jones Act, she added, is “good policy, works just fine.”

Jacksonville City Council President Aaron Bowman likewise lauded the “permanent jobs” created by shipping.

The Florida Maritime Partnership also touted bipartisan support for the Jones Act among Tampa Bay electeds. Port Tampa Bay creates more than 9,500 jobs contributes $2 billion to the Tampa economy, FMP said.

“The importance of the maritime industry to both Florida and the United States cannot be understated. A robust maritime industry means a strong economy, good jobs, and enhanced national security,” said Democratic U.S. Rep. Charlie Crist. “I’m proud to support the work of the Florida and American Maritime Partnerships, and today’s effort to highlight the industry’s vital role to our nation.”

Sarasota Republican Rep. Vern Buchanan concurred, saying  “with 15 deep water ports, including Port Manatee, Florida has an incredible opportunity to grow its maritime industry to help diversify our economy, create jobs and move goods and services.”

Those sentiments were echoed by Democratic state Sen. Darryl Rousson and Republican state Rep. Jackie Toledo, both of whom represent the Tampa Bay area.

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has written for FloridaPolitics.com since 2014. He is based in Northeast Florida. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


One comment

  • Rob Quartel

    March 25, 2019 at 5:05 pm

    I am continually surprised at the amazing ignorance our Congressional delegation shows when they’re paid enough money by the maritime lobby. Jacksonville is a great port, but its growth is stymied by the restrictive provisions of the Jones Act — which costs not Puerto Rico but Floridians their jobs. The list of lies, distortions, and outright stupidities begins with the big lie about Jones Act jobs — 99.1 percent of the jobs they cite are created by FOREIGN ships docking in the US, not American ships. And it only accelerates with the big lie about LNG. Crowley has a small facility which produces all of ten isotainers a day. At that rate, they’d need nearly a year to fill an LNG tanker, which, unfortunately, we don’t have in the dead-to-dying US “fleet.” Not one of these congressmen or women or local officials will debate the Jones Act in public with a knowledgeable opponent. That’s because the only thing that keeps it afloat is lies and BIG MONEY.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704