Brian Mast blasts Army Corps’s Lake O discharge policy

Brian Mast at Lake Okeechobee
'Total and absolute disaster.'

Republican U.S. Rep. Brian Mast blasted the Army Corps of Engineers policy governing discharges of water from Lake Okeechobee as “a total and absolute disaster” and called on the corps to strongly take into account the impacts on the coasts as it develops its new policy.

Mast, of Palm City, submitted comments as the corps goes through the process of replacing its Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule. That LORS policy governs when, why and how much water is discharged from the lake into rivers to make its way to the east and west coasts.

The corps is formulating the new policy, dubbed the Lake Okeechobee System Operating Manual, and accepting public comment, because of a section Mast got included last year in Water Resources and Development Act, Senate Bill 3021.

“LORS has been a total and absolute disaster. Under the false pretense of ‘shared adversity,’ the entire system was designed to benefit certain water users at the severe detriment of the east and west coasts of Florida,” Mast wrote in the comments submitted to Ann Hodgson at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District.

Mast was referring to the algae blooms that ravaged both coasts in each of the past two years, fed in large part by the nutrient-rich waters  diverted from the lake, through the rivers, to the coasts, leading to massive algae growth, marine animal die-offs, public health crises, and hard hits to the tourism and fishing economies.

“My constituents have seen their animals killed, their personal health put at severe risk, their surrounding environment destroyed and their businesses decimated — in large part due to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s deeply flawed operations system,” he continued.”

Mast’s comments include a reminder that the corps must consider direct and indirect effects on the human environment. He argues that those must include effects on public health and safety; unique characteristics orf the area; potential for controversy; uncertainty about effect or unique risks; potential for establishing precedent; cumulative impacts; potential adverse effects on things listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historic resources; potential adverse effects on endangered or threatened species or their habitat, or on critical habitat; and potential for violation of another law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.

“Moreover, you are required to consider the human environmental impacts, including detrimental effects on ecosystems such as the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee rivers, the health risks associated with human interaction with those water bodies, and the relationship of human communities to those water bodies, such as detrimental economic impacts,” Mast added.

Mast also included 26-page report prepared by his office detailing the environmental and human impacts of Lake Okeechobee discharges. plus more 1,100 written comments he forwarded to the corps from his constituents.

Scott Powers

Scott Powers is an Orlando-based political journalist with 30+ years’ experience, mostly at newspapers such as the Orlando Sentinel and the Columbus Dispatch. He covers local, state and federal politics and space news across much of Central Florida. His career earned numerous journalism awards for stories ranging from the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster to presidential elections to misplaced nuclear waste. He and his wife Connie have three grown children. Besides them, he’s into mystery and suspense books and movies, rock, blues, basketball, baseball, writing unpublished novels, and being amused. Email him at [email protected].

One comment

  • Kat

    April 24, 2019 at 11:10 am

    Most of the nutrient load that feed the algae blooms on the east coast came not from the lake releases, but from local basin runoff. This is well documented in the University of Florida Water Institute Study. Articles like this one that blame the lake for the algae problem, without pointing out that the lake releases account for about 30 percent of the water and about 20-30 percent of the nutrient load, fail to draw attention to the bigger problem of local basin runoff. The lake is a factor that should be addressed. But the bigger problem is the local basin runoff and until the media starts paying more attention to that problem it will not be addressed.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn


This is default text for notification bar