Barbara Lagoa, a Florida daughter of Cuban exiles, has had a swift rise as a lawyer, judge, and now a potential U.S. Supreme Court Justice, with a place on President Donald Trump’s short list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The President said Monday that he does not personally know Lagoa but praised her as “terrific.” Barely veiled was the fact that, as a Cuban-American from South Florida’s city of Hialeah, her selection could benefit Trump in the Nov. 3 election, when Florida could be the ultimate kingmaker.
Still, in an appearance on Fox and Friends, Trump stopped short of an endorsement, holding equally open the prospects of three or four other women judges he’s considering.
After the death Friday of 87-year-old Ginsburg, a liberal icon, Trump said he would name a woman as a replacement — possibly by Saturday. Trump said Monday he has four or five top prospects.
Lagoa, 52, an only child, once joked that after graduating from Florida International University leaving her close-knit Cuban-American family for New York to obtain her law degree from Columbia University “was not a popular decision in my house.”
When she was picked for the Florida Supreme Court, Lagoa said her father gave up his dream of becoming a lawyer and that both her parents worked long hours while she rode her bike and roller skated down the streets of Hialeah where she was cared for by her grandmother.
“My parents sacrificed to send me to Catholic school further instilling in me an abiding faith in God that has grounded me and sustained me through the highs and lows of life,” she said.
She spent barely 10 months on Florida’s highest court before getting another call.
Lagoa is currently a judge on the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Trump appointed her to that post in 2019 and the Senate confirmed her on an 80-15 vote.
Before serving on the Florida Supreme Court. Lagoa spent more than a decade on a Miami-based state appeals court where she wrote some 360 opinions. She was the first woman of Hispanic heritage on the state Supreme Court.
She’s been in private practice, including work for Florida family members on the 2000 saga of the custody of Cuban rafter child Elian Gonzalez, which remains a hot-button issue in Miami to this day. Lagoa was also a federal prosecutor in Miami for a time.
A Lagoa nomination may impact voters in the suburb of Hialeah, a popular site for campaigns seeking to persuade undecided voters.
Last weekend, groups for Biden and Trump rallied Cuban-Americans with drive-by events waving flags in this bastion of working-class voters where precinct-level analysis suggest Trump was not as dominant among Cubans in 2016.
“It is extremely exciting to have a fellow first-generation Cuban-American from Hialeah,” said Annette Collazo, also a daughter of exiles who is running as a Democrat for state representative in a district that includes Hialeah. “I temper that excitement with the reality. While diversity in background and views are extremely important, we also need diversity in judicial approach.”
At 52, Lagoa would become the youngest member of the U.S. Supreme Court if nominated and confirmed.
The process remains fluid, but as of Monday afternoon, conversations in the White House and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office were increasingly focused on two finalists: Amy Coney Barrett and Lagoa.
Coney Barrett emerged as the clear preference of a growing number of senators, largely because she is the much better-known of the two, having been through a grueling Senate confirmation process already and been embraced by the conservative base. Predictability is considered a crucial factor for the president and vulnerable senators so close to the election. Lagoa remains in the running, however, and those who know her well expect Trump to warm to her if and when they meet in person.
In her short tenure on the 11th Circuit, one controversial ruling in which she was among five Trump appointees in the majority was a 6-4 decision earlier this month that Florida felons had to not only complete their prison time but also pay any fines, fees and restitution.
There were calls from supporters of the original felon voting amendment for Lagoa and a fellow 11th Circuit Judge, Robert Luck, to recuse themselves from the case because they participated in a state Supreme Court case on the issue but neither did.
The decision upheld a state law passed by the Legislature that critics say violates the spirit of a constitutional amendment overwhelming approved by Florida voters in 2018 that potentially would enfranchise tens of thousands of former felons without the monetary considerations.
Desmond Meade, who led the effort to pass the measure known as Amendment 4 , called the decision “a blow to democracy and to the hundreds of thousands of returning citizens across Florida.”
When she was appointed to the state Supreme Court by Gov. Ron DeSantis, Lagoa had this to say about the role of the courts:
“I am particularly mindful of the fact that under our constitutional system it is for the Legislature and not the courts to make the law. It is the role of judges to apply, not to alter, the work of the peoples’ representatives. And it is the role of judges to interpret our Constitution and statutes as they are written.”
DeSantis said her credentials were “impeccable” and said Lagoa’s background as the daughter of exiles who fled communist Cuba gave her a unique perspective on U.S. law. Lagoa was born in Miami in 1967 after her parents left Cuba.
“My parents, like many others, came to this country from Cuba to start rebuilding their lives in a land that offered them opportunity, but more importantly, freedom,” she has said.
Lagoa is is also a member of the Federalist Society, a legal organization popular with conservatives. She is married to Miami lawyer Paul Huck Jr., whose father, Paul Huck Sr., is a senior judge on the Miami-based federal court. They have three daughters.
Republished with permission from The Associated Press.
September 21, 2020 at 5:45 pm
Lagoa appears to be a good judge.
Considering Chief Justice Roberts, and no doubt many others it is clear enough that whatever side of the aisle justices of the SCOTUS may have been sponsored and nominated and approved/confirmed by is NOT an infallible indication of how they will vote once they reach that court.
Maybe it’s time for all of the elected folks on all sides of the aisle to focus/concentrate on getting GOOD PEOPLE onto the Supreme Court, and never mind the nonsense of ”party affiliation.”
Comments are closed.