House ready to vote on 15-week abortion bill
Stock image via Adobe.

selective focus of pregnancy test on book with abortion law lettering near stethoscope
With more than 100 public speakers, Democratic lawmakers yielded their time (again) to broaden public testimony.

The committee-level fights over a bill that would prohibit abortion in Florida after 15 weeks of pregnancy are finished.

The House Health and Human Services Committee sealed the deal Thursday, advancing the bill (HB 5) despite ongoing efforts by Democratic lawmakers and activists to derail it. The Republican-sponsored bill — which accepted no amendments — now awaits the House’s full consideration.

The proposal is among the most divisive of the 2022 Legislative Session. It tests the limits of Roe v. Wade — a fact trumpeted by bill sponsors, Republican Reps. Erin Grall of Vero Beach and Jenna Persons-Mulicka of Fort Myers, and other proponents.

“There is no right to abortion in the federal Constitution or the state constitution,” Grall said. “There is a right to life.”

Florida law currently prohibits third-trimester abortions — which the law says begins at the 24th week of gestation — with certain medical exceptions.

The proposal, however, would ban abortions after 15 weeks and makes no exceptions for rape or incest. The procedure, though, would remain legal if the life of the mother is at risk.

The bill is similar in nature to a controversial Mississippi law under the review of the U.S. Supreme Court. A judgment is expected in June, per media reports.

“I want to see Florida join Mississippi,” said Republican Rep. Will Robinson of Bradenton.

The bill would loop pregnant women into a tobacco education program. It also creates an infant mortality review process, bolsters infant mortality-reduction initiatives and enhances Florida’s abortion reporting requirements to include instances of human trafficking.

Democratic Rep. Michele Rayner of St. Petersburg filed an amendment that would’ve stripped the bill of abortion language, but left its other provisions untouched.

Democratic lawmakers urged the Republican majority to accept the amendment. The amendment, like all others, failed along party lines.

“This bill is unconstitutional,” Rayner lamented. “We will be passing unconstitutional legislation that will cost Floridians more money and more time.”

More than 100 people attended the meeting, mostly critics, with some traveling from as far as Miami.

Chairwoman Colleen Burton, a Republican, moved to limit public testimony to 30 seconds. She also prohibited those wishing to speak from doing so on someone else’s behalf, angering many attendees.

Democratic Ranking Member Tracie Davis objected. She and rank-and-file Democrats waived their time on questions and debate to provide more time to the public.

“Throughout this process, public voices have somewhat been stifled,” Davis said.

According to a staff analysis, state officials recorded 209,645 live births in 2020 and 72,073 abortions — most of which were elective.

If the measure is passed, North Carolina would be the nearest state to allow abortions after 15 weeks.

“Abortion is health care, and we have to get away from making it this political football,” said Democratic Rep. Kelly Skidmore of Boca Raton.

The fight against abortion rights is ramping up nationwide. In October, Texas enacted one of the strictest abortion laws in the nation. Known as the Heartbeat Bill, it outlaws abortions after six weeks. West Virginia, meanwhile, has introduced legislation to impose a 15-week abortion ban.

Republican lawmakers in Florida enjoy the blessing of Gov. Ron DeSantis, who described the bill in January as “very reasonable.” Senate President Wilton Simpson and House Speaker Chris Sprowls — both Republicans — also are on board.

Critics of the bill note it is largely supported by male Republican lawmakers, who, they say, have no right to legislate a women’s body. The gender issue became apparent during a voice vote, when the votes of Democratic women drowned in a sea of Republican male voices.

“The majority of the co-sponsors are men,” Rayner said. “And so once again, you have men who are telling people who are able to give birth, what they can and cannot do with their bodies.”

If signed into law, the bill would take effect July 1. Lakeland Republican Sen. Kelli Stargel is the companion bill sponsor (SB 146). Stargel’s measure awaits review by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Jason Delgado

Jason Delgado covers news out of the Florida State Capitol. After a go with the U.S. Army, the Orlando-native attended the University of Central Florida and earned a degree in American Policy and National Security. His past bylines include WMFE-NPR and POLITICO Florida. He'd love to hear from you. You can reach Jason by email ([email protected]) or on Twitter at @byJasonDelgado.


  • PeterH

    February 10, 2022 at 11:38 am

    Legislators are committed to Ron DeSantis’s FREEDUMB STATE OF FLORIDA….. regardless if a woman is forced to bring an unwanted child into the world.

    Planned Parenthood will create an ‘underground railroad’ to a blue state for Florida’s women.

    • zhombre

      February 10, 2022 at 6:12 pm

      More ridiculous Lincoln Project talking points from the resident LP pimp at Florida Politics.

  • The Free Floridian

    February 11, 2022 at 9:11 am

    It is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human being… abortion does just that

  • Antonio

    February 11, 2022 at 9:45 am

    This is always a tricky situation. No one should be forced to have a child they may not want to have, be it personal choice or a rape situation. But at a certain point, it’s a sentient fetus with a heartbeat, and aborting that far along is undeniably killing.

  • Cliff

    February 11, 2022 at 10:12 pm

    I think the Republicans in Florida and other states are going about preventing abortions in the wrong way. If they really want to prevent females from having abortions, the simplest way would be mandatory, reversible vasectomies for all males over the age of, say 15. A vasectomy can only be reversed once a male has married, and then only with his consent. Upon divorce, if the male has had his vasectomy reversed, the vasectomy will be redone. Abortion clinics can be turned into vasectomy clinics. Anyone who performs a vasectomy reversal on an unmarried male or who assists in a reversal can be sued and fined if convicted. Vasectomy operations are easier to perform with much less risk of complications and emotional trauma. No need to check for fetal heartbeats or calculate conception dates. No court cases will be needed to determine when life begins. Females will not need to fight for their “reproductive rights.” Some males may see mandatory vasectomies as impinging on their “reproductive rights”, but they have to ask themselves if the inconvenience of a vasectomy isn’t worth it if it prevents abortions. This method of preventing abortions will also give males cause to consider seriously the decision to divorce their wives, thus protecting the sanctity of the family. Multiple good things would come out of one such law. Okay, Republicans, how about proposing mandatory vasectomies in your state legislatures to stop women from getting pregnant in the first place instead of forcing them to endure carrying unwanted pregnancies to term. Much less trauma, much fewer unwanted, unloved children, and possibly fewer divorces in the bargain. Wouldn’t everybody come out ahead?

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704