Major changes to US immigration policy are under discussion. What are they and what could they mean?
Southern border. Image via AP

border.
President Joe Biden has said he is willing to make “significant compromises on the border.”

Congress is discussing changes to the immigration system in exchange for providing money to Ukraine in its fight against Russia and Israel for the war with Hamas.

President Joe Biden has said he is willing to make “significant compromises on the border” to meet Republican demands that the assistance be tied to an overhaul of U.S border policy.

Republicans say the record numbers of migrants crossing the southern border pose a security threat because authorities cannot adequately screen all the migrants and that those who enter the United States are straining the country’s resources. GOP lawmakers also say they cannot justify to their constituents sending billions of dollars to other countries, even in a time of war, while failing to address the border at home.

But many immigration advocates, including some Democrats, say some of the changes being proposed would gut protections for people who desperately need help and would not really ease the chaos at the border.

Much of the negotiating is taking place in private, but some of the issues under discussion are known: asylum standards, humanitarian parole and fast-track deportation authority, among others.

A look at what they are and what might happen if there are changes:

Humanitarian parole

Using humanitarian parole, the U.S. government can let people into the country by essentially bypassing the regular immigration process. This power is supposed to be used on a case-by-case basis for “urgent humanitarian reasons” or “significant public benefit.” Migrants are usually admitted for a pre-determined period and there’s no path toward U.S. citizenship.

Over the years, administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have used humanitarian parole to admit people into the U.S. and help groups of people from all over the world. It’s been used to admit people from Hungary in the 1950s, from Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos during the latter half of the 1970s, and Iraqi Kurds who had worked with the U.S. in the mid-1990s, according to research by the Cato Institute.

Under Biden, the U.S. has relied heavily on humanitarian parole. The U.S. airlifted nearly 80,000 Afghans from Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, and brought them to the U.S. after the Taliban takeover. The U.S. has admitted tens of thousands of Ukrainians who fled after the Russian invasion.

In January the Democratic administration announced a plan to admit 30,000 people a month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela via humanitarian parole, provided those migrants had a financial sponsor and flew to the U.S. instead of going to the U.S.-Mexico border for entry.

The latest U.S. government figures show nearly 270,000 people had been admitted into the country through October under that program. Separately, 324,000 people have gotten appointments through a mobile app called CBP One that is used to grant parole to people at land crossings with Mexico.

Republicans have described the programs as essentially an end run around Congress by letting in large numbers of people who otherwise would have no path to be admitted. Texas sued the administration to stop the program aimed at Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.

What might change with asylum?

Asylum is a type of protection that allows a migrant to stay in the U..S. and have a path to American citizenship. To qualify for asylum, someone has to demonstrate fear of persecution back home due to a fairly specific set of criteria: race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinions. Asylum-seekers must be on U.S. soil when they ask for this protection.

They generally go through an initial screening called a credible fear interview. If they are determined to have a chance of getting asylum, they are allowed to stay in the U.S. to pursue their case in immigration court. That process can take years. In the meantime, asylum-seekers can start to work, get married, have children and create a life.

Critics say the problem is that most people do not end up getting asylum when their case finally makes it to immigration court. But they say migrants know that if they claim asylum, they essentially will be allowed to stay in America for years.

“People aren’t necessarily coming to apply for asylum as much to access that asylum adjudication process,” said Andrew Arthur, a former immigration court judge and fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for less immigration in the U.S.

Some of what lawmakers are discussing would raise the bar that migrants need to meet during that initial credible fear interview. Those who do not meet it would be sent home.

But Paul Schmidt, a retired immigration court judge who blogs about immigration court issues, said the credible fear interview was never intended to be so tough. Migrants are doing the interview soon after arriving at the border from an often arduous and traumatizing journey, he said. Schmidt said the interview is more of an “initial screening” to weed out those with frivolous asylum claims.

Schmidt also questioned the argument that most migrants fail their final asylum screening. He said some immigration judges apply overly restrictive standards and that the system is so backlogged that it is hard to know exactly what the most recent and reliable statistics are.

What is expedited removal?

Expedited removal, created in 1996 by Congress, basically allows low-level immigration officers, as opposed to an immigration judge, to quickly deport certain immigrants. It was not widely used until 2004 and generally has been used to deport people apprehended within 100 miles of the Mexican or Canadian border and within two weeks of their arrival.

Defenders say it relieves the burden on the backlogged immigration courts. Immigration advocates say its use is prone to errors and does not give migrants enough protections, such as having a lawyer help them argue their case. As president, Republican Donald Trump pushed to expand this fast-track deportation policy nationwide and for longer periods of time. Opponents sued and that expansion never happened.

What might these changes do?

Much of the disagreement over these proposed changes comes down to whether people think deterrence works.

Arthur, the former immigration court judge, thinks it does. He said changes to the credible fear asylum standards and restrictions on the use of humanitarian parole would be a “game changer.” He said it would be a “costly endeavor” as the government would have to detain and deport many more migrants than today. But, he argued, eventually the numbers of people arriving would drop.

But others, like Schmidt, the retired immigration court judge, say migrants are so desperate, they will come anyway and make dangerous journeys to evade Border Patrol.

“Desperate people do desperate things,” he said.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.

Associated Press


9 comments

  • Impeach Biden

    December 10, 2023 at 9:04 am

    Whatever happened to the Border Czar? She is as incompetent as “Dementia” Joe.

    • PeterH

      December 10, 2023 at 2:47 pm

      As you well know the Executive Branch has absolutely no power or authority to write border legislation. That authority resides with Florida Republican representatives in Congress. Go ahead and write to them and ask them why they’ve done NOTHING but whine and complain about the Southern border. Rick Scott wrote responded to me that he “was waiting for the border to be secured before he would offer to write legislation!” Magical thinking at its best. ONLY CONGRESS CAN WRITE LAW FOR TGE EXECUTIVE BRANCH TO FOLLOW.

  • EARL PITTS AMERICAN

    December 10, 2023 at 10:35 am

    Good Morn ‘Ting America,
    What 8iden has been doing since he took office at our border(s) is illegal●
    PERIOD●
    This, America: “●” is a Big PERIOD WHICH MEANS “END OF DISCUSSION.
    Earl has spoken: its illegal●
    So now here comes “The Leader Of The 8iden Crime Family” saying that he is ”
    willing to make “significant compromises on the border.”
    This, America is 3rd World politics. See how low our once Great Nation has fallen?
    Both Houses of Congress should have Impeached 8iden with 100% votes prior to his second year in office.
    Thank you America,
    Earl Pitts “Earl Dont Lie” American

    • rick whitaker

      December 10, 2023 at 12:03 pm

      WARNING ⚠ TROLL COMMENT BY EARL LIAR PITTS

  • Bill Clinton

    December 10, 2023 at 1:19 pm

    In typical Democrat fashion, this FP article is misleading in favor of Biden. 80,000 Afghans were airlifted, yet hardly any have been granted humanitarian parole. Why list the airlift stat immediately behind a conclusion that Biden has relied on it? Ask any veteran helping Afghans: this administration is the most immoral administration to date, yet they have great friends across the media continuing to spew tone deaf lies!

    • rick whitaker

      December 10, 2023 at 2:38 pm

      bill clinton, does trump setting a pullout date and then biden later on having to honor it not mean anything to you? it means a lot to me. blaming the messenger for the message is not cool inn my book. the FP article was fine i thought. sounds like you just don’t like dems. if that’s the case you would hate me.

  • PeterH

    December 10, 2023 at 3:01 pm

    Fun Fact:
    In 2017 then President Donald Trump was so frustrated with the influx at the Southern border THAT HE COULD DO LITTLE ABOUT….. that he met with Republican Lindsey Graham to formulate a bipartisan group to address the immigration issue. Senator Graham did just that and returned to the Oval Office in six months time with an excellent and comprehensive immigration reform plan.

    Trump’s hateful and racist advisor, Steve Miller rejected the plan …… because he had a better more hurtful plan. Miller’s plan was designed to discourage families from entering into the USA and asking for asylum. This was the beginning of Trump’s “family separation policy” of separating parents from their children and creating “holding pens” to house children. Border staff were not trained on how to register and document which child arrived with which parent or family and hundreds of children were left orphaned in US custody. Let’s remember the past so we don’t embarrass ourselves to repeat it.

  • Leslie

    December 21, 2023 at 2:14 pm

    Migrants carry infectious diseases, says a 2023 USA Today report. Illegal immigrants spreading infectious diseases, says researchers in 2021. Yet, the Biden Administration is letting thousands go UNRELEASED into USA to infect others. Indeed, you can thank the failure of Biden Administration for allowing the increased spread of COVID variants, TB, parasitic infestations, sexually-transmitted diseases, influenza A and B, Hepatitis A, B & C, Ebola, Monkey Pox, Rubella, Measles, Lice, Chagas Disease, Dengue Fever, Mumps, Scabies, etc….THANK YOU HARRIS AND BIDEN. VOTE REPUBLICAN as a matter of public health and safety.

    • rick whitaker

      December 21, 2023 at 2:21 pm

      white christian nationalists that are anti-vaxers and conspiracy theorists are a huge medical problem, you forgot to mention their negative impact on our nations health. how convenient of you.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories


This is default text for notification bar