Teens warn Florida’s proposed social media ban may have consequences ahead of Senate vote
Image via Fresh Take Florida.

Social Media Ban
'It has the potential to do more harm than good to youth by taking away a vital resource.'

During the height of the pandemic, 14-year-old Taylor Thigpen started his business, PlantKingusa, with $5, a dream, and an Instagram page.

His love for horticulture and interest in sustainability led him to create his own plant nursery to ship out plants across the country. Growing up in Green Cove Springs, south of Jacksonville, in a low-income, single-parent household gave him the motivation to become financially independent at a young age.

Today, Thigpen, now an 18-year-old senior at St. Johns Country Day School, ships thousands of plants across all 50 states and uses his business to help him pay for college. It all wouldn’t have been possible without social media marketing, he said.

“The use of social media allowed me to reach a large market of people that I wouldn’t have been able to reach otherwise,” Thigpen said. “I really only got noticed because I was able to use apps like Facebook and Instagram to promote my story and to promote my products.”

Thigpen and other young entrepreneurs and activists are worried about a Florida proposal to ban social media for all minors under 16 — even with consent of their parents. The bill passed the House last month and was expected to clear the Senate on Wednesday. Last week, a Senate panel passed the bill 12-5 with only one Democrat, Sen. Rosalind Osgood, a Tamarac Democrat, voting in favor of it.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has championed parents’ choices about how to raise their own children, said last month that he has legal concerns about the bill. “To say that someone that is 15 just cannot have it no matter what, even if the parent consents, that may create some legal issues,” he said at a news conference Jan. 26. “I want to empower parents, I want to give parents tools to be able to do this, so I just think you have to be smart with how you do it.”

The bill is a top priority for the House speaker, Rep. Paul Renner, a Palm Coast Republican. It would prohibit in Florida anyone under 16 years old as account holders of any social media platform. It instructs social media companies to implement age verification technology to determine the user’s age and further instructs all current accounts of minors under 16 be deleted.

“It has the potential to do more harm than good to youth by taking away a vital resource,” Thigpen said. “Youth who come from low-income families can use … social media to connect with mental health resources. Or, if they’re suffering from food insecurity, they can use it to find resources like food banks or soup kitchens.”

Thigpen is not alone using social media for good reasons. Anjani Sharma, a 17-year-old senior at West Shore Senior High, started the nonprofit Minds Without B0rders while she was 14 years old. The goal of the organization was to provide mental health resources to youth.

Sharma saw a need after she noticed that the mental health curriculum at her school was not connecting with students.

Minds Without B0rders gives students a platform to talk with each other about their own mental issues and also work together to propose policy changes to their representatives. It has chapters across the U.S. as well as overseas. Sharma credits social media with allowing her to grow it very fast.

“We would post about mental health awareness on our platforms or educate people with Reels and TikToks,” Sharma said. “We would have other youth reach out to us through social media (direct messages) asking how they can get involved and later opening their own chapters at their own schools. We’ve done so much good work simply by connecting to other kids through our platforms.”

Sharma noted the Florida proposal was created amid concerns about the negative effects of social media on minors’ mental health. She acknowledged that social media can contribute to mental health issues but also sees it as a resource that can combat some of the same issues.

“The way this bill is written is not going to just make these issues go away,” Sharma said. “Social media helps them understand mental health issues, or connect with friends and find a community, or even find Minds Without B0rders to give them mental health resources.”

Republican Rep. Tyler Sirois of Merritt Island, one of the sponsors for the House bill, said in an interview that the Legislature was placing restrictions on activities that can harm youth. He compared it to age restrictions for driving or alcohol.

“Legislatures take steps to establish parameters for keeping children safe. I don’t see this bill being a conversation on whether or not social media is good or bad,” Sirois said. “What we’re saying with this legislation is that there are features that are harmful and addictive and we need to put up guardrails to keep our children safe.”

GOP Rep. Fiona McFarland of Sarasota, who also sponsored the House bill, said the move was necessary given the risks of social media.

McFarland said classroom teachers have expressed concerns about social media’s effects on children, and law enforcement officers were worried about cyberbullying, threats or even human trafficking that can occur.

“Parents are telling us they need help. They have kids that are having accounts that they can’t keep up with or fake parallel accounts that they don’t know about,” McFarland said. “It’s a world that they’re really struggling to navigate as they look at their teens being frenzied and worried for fear of missing out. Parents are asking for our help, too.”

In Washington, lawmakers are considering federal legislation that would provide parents with tools to supervise their kids’ use of social media and restrict access to minors’ personal data. During a fiery hearing last month, the CEOs of Meta, TikTok, X and other social media companies heard testimony from kids and parents who said social media can be dangerous, even deadly. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologized to parents and children who attended the congressional hearing.

The Florida bill passed the House 106-13, but there are questions whether such a new law would survive legal challenges. NetChoice, a trade association of technology companies that advocates for free expression on the internet, opposes the bill.

The association’s members include Meta, X, TikTok and Snapchat. It has filed lawsuits against similar legislation in Arkansas, Ohio and Utah. Federal courts currently have blocked the laws in Arkansas and Ohio over First Amendment concerns.

NetChoice’s top lawyer, Carl Szabo, said Florida’s bill violates the First Amendment rights of minors and discriminates against social media platforms but wouldn’t apply to email providers, streaming services, photo-editing applications, interactive gaming, news sites or other popular digital services.

“Time and time again the supreme courts have come on the side of minors stating that their First Amendment rights supersede even the restrictions put on them by a school administrator,” Szabo said. “There is no age limit in the First Amendment. An unconstitutional law will protect zero children.”

Samya Jones, 15, of Gainesville said she regularly sees inappropriate material on social media and supports the Florida proposal.

“(On social media), I’ve seen killing, drugs, guns, sex, all of that,” Jones said. “Younger children get a hold of social media and they start thinking that it’s a great influence. Some of them end up dead, killed or in gangs.”

Kalsi Hennessey, another 15-year-old at Gainesville High, said lots of her friends don’t have a phone plan on their phone, so social media is the only way for them to talk and interact with friends and keep up to date with what’s happening.

“I would definitely not be able to talk to a lot of my friends,” Hennessey said. “Talking to people is also a way of social development. If they took away that, then kids are going to have a hard time being social and developing well in that department.”

Maxx Fenning, 21, a business administration senior at the University of Florida, runs an organization, Prism, he founded as a 17-year-old in high school. The nonprofit provides education and resources for the LGBTQ+ community. Fenning said kids under 16 may not have told their parents about their sexuality, may lack transportation to attend in-person support groups and rely on social media for emotional support.

“There have been so many instances on our social platforms of young people coming forward and voicing concerns such as being terrified to come out to their parents or knowing how to navigate conversations surrounding their gender or sexuality,” Fenning said. “We were able to encourage and give guidance to these youth. It was only possible because they knew these platforms were a safe space they could confide in.”

Fenning said the Florida bill will further diminish resources for LGBTQ+ minors by limiting the reach of his organization.

“There is also so much good social media does,” he said. “For all of its possible harms, it is also a critical access point for providing resources — mental health resources — to young people. Something that outright wipes out their access to those platforms would be devastating to young people who oftentimes use it as a lifeline to access resources, especially when they’re unable to get support from their parents.”

___

This story was produced by Fresh Take Florida, a news service of the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications. The reporter can be reached at [email protected]. You can donate to support our students here.

Fresh Take Florida


5 comments

  • Dont Say FLA

    February 20, 2024 at 9:41 pm

    How about those in their second childhood?

    Should Trumpy really be on social media?

    No. No, he should not.

  • Dancing Outlaw

    February 21, 2024 at 8:37 am

    It’s okay kids. Just incorporate. Then it’s your corporation using social media, not you.

  • Front Seat Back Seat

    February 21, 2024 at 8:49 am

    Blindly picking an alternative to one bad thing doesn’t necessarily bring improvement and in fact can aggravate the issue twenty fold or more.

    There must be a study saying social media is bad. Okay. Got it. Agree.

    Now, where’s the study about kids being excluded from social media? What is the effect of exclusion?

    Is exclusion really better? Or is it just another situation of 100+ back seat hot car deaths annually for the purpose of avoiding 4 or 5 front seat deaths in car crashes?

    Legislators, please learn to think about outcomes. That goes as follows:
    1- “This” is bad
    2- Is the “alternative to this” actually any better?
    Then you Pick one of Yes, No, Maybe. If the answer is No, “This” is the lesser evil. If the answer is “maybe,” don’t stick your nose where it don’t need to go. If the answer is “Yes” then maybe consider action where, in the case of kids, the parents can’t hannle it themselves.

  • Zeb

    February 21, 2024 at 9:39 am

    I am a father of 10 children I agree with this no child should be on social media under the age of 17 children aren’t ready

  • Cherry Wood

    February 21, 2024 at 2:24 pm

    Another instance where good teaching begins at home, and parents need to pay attention more!! Kids will find a way to do what they want to do.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories