Associated Press
NEW YORK (AP) — Testimony in the hush money trial of Donald Trump is set to conclude in the coming days, putting the landmark case on track for jury deliberations that will determine whether it ends in a mistrial, an acquittal — or the first-ever felony conviction of a former American president.
Jurors over the course of a month have heard testimony about sex and bookkeeping, tabloid journalism and presidential politics. Their task ahead will be to decide whether prosecutors who have charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records have proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Here’s a look at what the two sides have argued, who has been missing from the case, what to listen for in the final days and what prosecutors will have to prove to secure a conviction.
THE PROSECUTION’S CASE
Through witnesses including a porn actor, a veteran tabloid publisher and longtime Trump aides, the prosecution aimed to link the presumptive Republican nominee for the White House this year to a hush money scheme during the 2016 presidential campaign that resulted in the filing of phony business records to mask the alleged conspiracy.
Jurors heard testimony that two women and a doorman were paid tens of thousands of dollars to keep quiet during that campaign about stories that, had they emerged, could have embarrassed Trump. Jurors heard claims of sex, saw copies of texts, emails and checks and listened to a secret recording in which Trump and his then-lawyer can be heard discussing a plan to buy the silence of a Playboy model.
One witness, David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer and a longtime Trump friend, testified that he had agreed to be the “eyes and ears” of the Trump campaign by alerting it to any negative stories about him.
Actor Stormy Daniels told jurors, in occasionally graphic terms, about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump in 2006; he denies the whole thing. She described being offered $130,000 by Trump’s then-lawyer and personal fixer, Michael Cohen, to remain silent after she said she was looking for ways to sell the story and get it out there.
Cohen, the prosecution’s star witness, spent days on the stand recounting what he said was Trump’s role in authorizing the hush money payments. Cohen described Trump as anxious that stories alleging extramarital sex could harm his campaign standing with female voters and said the then-candidate had directed him to suppress the stories, quoting him as saying exhortations including, “Just do it” and “We need to stop this from getting out.”
THE DEFENSE’S POSITION
Trump’s legal team has not yet called witnesses, and it remains unclear what exactly his lawyers will do when it is their turn to present evidence.
But they have signaled through their questioning of the prosecution’s witnesses specific areas where they think they can sow doubt for the jury, contesting along the way the foundational premises of the case.
They have disputed Daniels’ account of a hotel suite sexual encounter, with the actor facing an aggressive cross-examination from a defense lawyer who said at one point, “You have made all of this up, right?” Daniels said no.
And they have suggested that Trump’s celebrity status made him an easy extortion target. They grilled the Los Angeles lawyer who negotiated Daniels’ deal about other celebrities from whom he had previously “extracted” money in exchange for a client’s silence.
But the most consequential cross-examination, by far, has been that of Cohen. The defense has tried to depict him as a fame-seeking fabulist desperate to contribute to a Trump conviction.
The cross-examination began in splashy fashion, with Trump attorney Todd Blanche asking the former fixer if he recalled referring to the lawyer by an expletive on TikTok last month. Prosecutors objected, the judge summoned the parties to the bench and the question was stricken. But the point was clear.
Over the course of hours, Blanche refreshed Cohen’s recollection about a litany of colorful but often profane monikers he had assigned Trump — “Cheeto-dusted cartoon villain” was one — as a way to paint Cohen as egregiously biased, blinded by hatred and therefore not credible.
There was also an avalanche of questions about Cohen’s past crimes and lies. Blanche forced Cohen to acknowledge that he fibbed under oath during his own 2018 plea hearing about not feeling pressure to plead guilty. In a dramatic moment, Blanche suggested that Cohen had not told the truth when he said he spoke to Trump about the Daniels payment before wiring her lawyer $130,000.
Blanche confronted Cohen with texts indicating that what was on his mind, at least initially, during the phone call were harassing calls he was getting from an apparent 14-year-old prankster.
The strategy was predictable given Cohen’s significance to the case but it is too soon to tell how it landed with the jury.
THE MISSING LINKS
Multiple characters pivotal to the saga have been name-dropped in court but have been notably absent from the witness stand.
One is Karen McDougal, a Playboy model who has said she had an affair with Trump and received $150,000 from the National Enquirer in a hush money deal that Cohen helped broker. Keith Schiller, Trump’s bodyguard, was described in court as the person who asked Daniels for her phone number on Trump’s behalf and was an important conduit for Cohen when he needed to reach Trump.
And then there’s Allen Weisselberg, the former Trump Organization chief financial officer now serving a five-month jail sentence for lying under oath in the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against Trump.
Weisselberg did not testify in the hush money trial but he matters because, according to Cohen, he was present for a Trump Tower discussion that arguably most directly links Trump and the reimbursements at the center of the case that prosecutors say are fraudulent.
Cohen says the 2017 Trump Tower meeting occurred on the cusp of Inauguration Day and was where he, Trump and Weisselberg hammered out the mechanics of reimbursing him for the Daniels hush money payment. There, Cohen said, they agreed that the lawyer would receive a total of $420,000 in monthly installments for what would be billed — deceptively, prosecutors say — as legal services.
“He approved it,” Cohen testified. “And he also said: ‘This is going to be one heck of a ride in D.C.”’
Whether jurors will have wanted to have heard from Weisselberg is uncertain, but in a case that centers more on paperwork than sex, the account of that meeting is likely to be held up by prosecutors as a vital piece of evidence and it will be important to see how they return to it as they wrap up their case with closing statements.
WHAT MUST BE PROVED FOR A CONVICTION?
To convict Trump of felony falsifying business records, prosecutors must convince jurors beyond a reasonable doubt that he not only falsified or caused business records to be entered falsely, but that he did so with intent to commit or conceal another crime. Any verdict must be unanimous.
Prosecutors allege that Trump logged Cohen’s repayment as legal expenses to conceal multiple other crimes, including breaches of campaign finance law and a violation of a state election law alleging a conspiracy to promote or prevent an election.
In his opening statement, Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo told jurors the case “is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up — an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of a presidential election, and then the steps that Donald Trump took to conceal that illegal election fraud.”
Specifically, prosecutors contend, the payments to McDougal, Daniels and the doorman violated federal restrictions on corporate and individual campaign contributions and were meant to conceal damaging information from the voting public.
Among other evidence, jurors heard testimony about Cohen’s 2018 guilty to a campaign finance crime and the National Enquirer’s nonprosecution agreement and $187,500 fine for the McDougal payment, which the Federal Election Commission considered an illegal corporate contribution to Trump’s campaign.
New York also has a misdemeanor falsifying business records charge, which requires proving only that a defendant made or caused the false entries, but it is not part of Trump’s case and will not be considered by jurors.
21 comments
Dont Say FLA
May 19, 2024 at 10:09 am
No matter how well deserved one might be, I just don’t see a “guilty” verdict coming from this endeavor.
The key witness against Trump is, as a guy from Trump’s circle, every bit as skeezy as Trump. Nobody can believe a word Cohen says even if he somehow is not lying.
My Take
May 19, 2024 at 10:16 am
Guilty as sin.
But it may be an OJ ending.
Dont Say FLA
May 19, 2024 at 10:37 am
Probably so but Trump’s official OJ ending at least won’t be as many years off as OJ’s recent ending was.
Which is a Fine reason not to give elderlies so much power. IF they get busted for nonsense, they can legaleze it till they croak and never pay any price beyond attorneys fees but it seems they can just con folks into paying their attorney fees, resulting in them paying zero price themselves for anything untoward they might have got up to.
Presidents have to be at least 35 years old to avoid the ignorance of youth. How about a max age of 65 years old for any candidate going into a first term so as to avoid the now-obvious immunity of very old age?
Also how about a max length for any state of Presidential Candidacy? Max length one year? That way we wouldn’t have folks proclaiming 3 years of candidacy as a cloak of defense against prosecution of misdeeds in any one-term Presidencies to come which are so bad and so corrupt the voters chose not to re-elect?
Dont Say FLA
May 19, 2024 at 10:59 am
Actually rather than max age of 65, index the max age going into a first term based on social security eligibility age.
That way some party wants to run an 80 year old, first they gotta increase social security age to 80, and as long as that would take to accomplish, the 80 year old candidate would be expired by the time the SS age could be changed to 80.
Also if a human’s age becomes unimportant due to some scientific method invented that predicts remaining years, then if social security revamps to key off that calculation versus plain dumb age, so would the President max “age” requirement. Rather than saying you could only be 67 years old, we could say you “you require 25 years of life with a correctly functioning brain” going into a first term.
Tom
May 19, 2024 at 11:55 am
So if the condom doesn’t fit, you must acquit 🙂 The OJ ending was revenge for Rodney King. In trump’s case, I’d assume people would want revenge against him rather than for him but who knows, it only takes one juror. He’s bound to use up his nine lives eventually though and maybe this is the week.
rick whitaker
May 19, 2024 at 6:03 pm
TOM , do they make condoms that small shaped that funny?
Elvis Pitts "AMERICA'S BIG VOICE ON THE RIGHT" American
May 19, 2024 at 10:40 am
BUZZ BUZZ ….. BUZZ BUZZZ,
BUZZ BUZZ ….. BUZZ BUZZZ,
The Elvis Pitts American’s Sage Political Science [POLY SCI] Division interupts this “Dook 4 Brains Leftist A. P. Artical of Lies” to “Weigh In” with “Sage Sphincter Relaxing Wisdom” so ………………….STAND BY FOR REAL NEWS:
America, this stupid lawfare ahainst Trump is just another example of how stupid every “DOOK 4 BRAINS LEFTIST” American really is. The lawfare against Trump is actually HELPING Trump. This is evidenced by the Huge Numbers of Patriot Black Americans, both male & female, invl attendance and showing Their Sage Support for Trump at The recent Trump Wildwood, NJ Trump rally. *you have to either have been there or seen the true footage on FOX because the Dook 4 Brains Lefty news outlets editited the Blacks out*
AND THAT, AMERICA, IS THE “REST OF THE STORY”:
BUZZ BUZZ ….. BUZZ BUZZZ,
BUZZ BUZZ ….. BUZZ BUZZZ,
The Elvis Pitts American’s Sage Political Science [POLY SCI] Division now returns you to your regularly scheduled Sunday Morn ‘Ting activities.
Elvis Pitts American
rick whitaker
May 19, 2024 at 6:04 pm
ANOTHER STUPID COMMENT BY EARL, ELVIS, SPHINCTER MAN
Ocean Joe
May 19, 2024 at 11:29 am
The defendant is also the first candidate for president in decades to refuse to release his tax returns. He is a scumbag deluxe. The trial won’t matter, evangelical voters love a good whoremonger. The rednecks are all jealous they don’t have that kind of money to burn and there aren’t any doormen at the trailer park to bribe anyway.
Trump will pick up a few votes based on his chutzpah.
Dont Say FLA
May 19, 2024 at 1:14 pm
The irony of this trial is that Trump allegedly broke the law trying to deceive his voters because he does not really know his voters despite his constants claims of knowing them and being just like them blah blah blah
If only he knew his voters were as skeezy as him, there would be no trial going on right now.
Ocean Joe
May 20, 2024 at 4:44 am
The major irony is that he should be on trial for his Jan 6 treason and potentially led to the scaffolds for it.
Here, as usual, his first line of defense is what he always says when he’s caught: “I dont even know that person,” which led to all the gory details being admissible to prove otherwise.
The devil
May 19, 2024 at 12:36 pm
Allow me to give you the Catholic
Mens wife version of
Todays AP regurgitation:
Now the works of the flesh are obvious:
immorality, impurity, lust, idolatry,
sorcery, hatreds, rivalry, jealousy,
outbursts of fury, acts of selfishness,
dissensions, factions, occasions of envy,
drinking bouts, orgies, and the like.
I warn you, as I warned you before,
that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
In contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
patience, kindness, generosity,
faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.
Against such there is no law.
rick whitaker
May 20, 2024 at 5:09 pm
THE DEVIL , f the catholic men’s version of anything. religion is bad.
My Take
May 19, 2024 at 12:51 pm
Cohen has been a liar, sure.
But Trump is a notorious liar.
Trump’s denials have to be highly suspect.
One hopes Stormy convinced the jury that Trump lied about not “having” her.
Then they can extrapolate to his other denials.
This may counter in their minds the uncertainty in Cohen’s testimony.
Dont Say FLA
May 19, 2024 at 1:16 pm
The judicial outcome of Trump’s trial hinges on all twelve jurors taking Cohen’s lying to have been done as duty for Trump and that Trump is the liar. Not sure they’ll gonna get all twelve jurors across that finish line, but maybe? It could happen, I reckon.
Lakeland Man
May 19, 2024 at 1:22 pm
Don’t care- don’t care at all. Still voting Trump: best President since Reagan, and our only hope to beat back the insane Left.
Ocean Joe
May 20, 2024 at 4:50 am
Biggest deficits since Reagan too. Of course as Dick Cheney said, ‘deficits dont matter’ and then went on to help W Bush run the country into a huge financial ditch which you choose not to remember.
Trump will be useful for a few things: if anybody is willing to stop Iran from getting nukes it will be him. Iran is about more than Israel, it’s a threat to the oil producers nearby who supply most of our western allies. Then again, Trump intends to abandon our western allies anyway.
Ocean Joe
May 20, 2024 at 4:52 am
And you’re right, nobody cares about Trump’s sexual escapades or his machinations to pay for them.
rick whitaker
May 20, 2024 at 5:06 pm
LAKELAND MAN , i’ve read 2 of your posts. both were full of hate fear and stupidity. BTW, raygun is only 2nd to trump as being the worst 2 us presidents ever. just how full of fear, hate, and stuoidity are you? your love for raygun is a mental illness. PLEASE don’t ever leave lakeland.
JD
May 19, 2024 at 1:50 pm
I don’t think the prosecution would have rested on a Cohen ending without thinking they had a strong sway with the jury.
They’re not, after all, the US GOP House representatives trying to impeach Biden without evidence. They’ll nail him with this to the wall. I don’t think the SCOTUS or a Federal Judges granting Trump legal favors is going to ride to his savior.
Dont Say FLA
May 22, 2024 at 5:40 pm
I hope you’re right!
Comments are closed.