Ruff justice: Mike Waltz wants answers about CDC military puppy prohibition
Image via AP.

Trump Impeachment
'Service families could see their costs balloon to over $4,000.'

Call it a doggone shame.

A central Florida Republican wants answers on a federal rule that takes effect next week, keeping expatriated pooches from returning home with their military families without potential added cost or anxiety.

“While I understand the rule is aimed at preventing the reintroduction of dog rabies into the United States, as a combat veteran and pet-owner, I am concerned about any hardships these families may encounter when returning home. No military family should have to ponder the possibility of leaving their beloved dog or their puppies behind,” Rep. Mike Waltz wrote on Friday to Air Mobility Command Commander General Mike Minehan.

At issue for the former Green Beret: a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rule on dog imports that requires dogs to appear to be healthy, to be microchipped, to be at least six months old, and to have a CDC dog import form. From “high-risk” countries, a U.S.-issued Rabies Vaccination form or a USDA-endorsed health certificate is also required.

“I am disturbed that the CDC’s rule, which is scheduled to take effect on August 1st, has already caused unnecessary confusion with some airlines preventing dogs from onboarding with their families on international flights back home. According to recent media reports, while some airlines may still transport these dogs by air freight, service families could see their costs balloon to over $4,000,” Waltz wrote.

The Congressman seeks clarification on whether the contractor, Patriot Express, will not simply exclude all dogs from boarding, and what efforts will be made to mitigate potential costs and inconvenience for families returning from abroad.

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has been the Northeast Florida correspondent for Florida Politics since 2014. He writes for the New York Post and National Review also, with previous work in the American Conservative and Washington Times and a 15+ year run as a columnist in Folio Weekly. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


3 comments

  • Susan

    July 27, 2024 at 7:51 pm

    This does not seem to be too heavy a requirement by the CDC. Families should be able to bring their dogs and there are issues with flying them air freight where they can die of dehydration and heat exhaustion. As a pet owner I would want to do those things for my dog anyway to make sure he is safe and can sit with me up front. But if families choose to adopt abroad then they need to also follow the same rules other countries have. The US does not require extended quarantines like the UK and other countries so what the CDC is requiring seems reasonable and those families should have to pay the cost, not the military unless it’s a military service dog. They aren’t saying you can’t bring your dog. It just needs clarity. Quarantines are very hard on pets and families and pets can die so I would want to do whatever necessary to avoid that.

  • Cindy

    July 28, 2024 at 6:58 pm

    If you are transitional. ,,,Maybe pets shouldn’t be in the picture.. it is like poverty and housing issues

  • Cindy

    July 28, 2024 at 6:59 pm

    It’s like poverty and pet ownership and housing issues

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704