Amendment 4 needed 60% to pass. Why? Blame the pigs.
Voters are energized for 2024, and early numbers reflect the buzz.

early voting
'Had we been any other state, we would be celebrating right now.'

One reason Amendment 3 and Amendment 4 failed to legalize recreational marijuana and protect abortion rights in Tuesday’s election?

Blame pregnant sows.

A majority of voters supported both ballot initiatives, but not enough to propel them past the 60% approval rate to pass.

Florida makes it harder than most states to pass a constitutional amendment. With a few exceptions (like Colorado, which has a 55% approval rate), most states require measures to get at least 50.1% of the vote to win.

The story of what makes Florida so tough begins in 1996 when Republicans took control of the Legislature for the first time in a hundred years. They never let it go.

“They began to get frustrated with some of the constitutional amendments that were being proposed and passed because one of the ways that people can go around the Legislature in Florida is to propose an initiative petition,” said University of Central Florida political science assistant professor Aubrey Jewett.

By the early 2000s, voters approved class-size limits, created universal pre-K, and building a high-speed rail system to connect five cities.

“Conservatives at the time were concerned,” Jewett said. “Because of the cost. Again, (the initiatives) didn’t have any particular extra tax mechanism or anything, but they were requiring things that were going to cost money.”

Perhaps “the straw that broke the camel’s back,” Jewett said, was when voters also approved an animal rights ballot initiative to enshrine protections for pregnant sows into the state constitution. With 55% of the vote, the measure passed in 2002.

“But really pregnant pigs, is that the kind of thing that should be in the Florida constitution?” was the mindset back then, Jewett said.

Jewett also pointed out that another argument for Florida to take action was the high bar for changing the U.S. Constitution, which requires a three-fourths vote.

In 2006, lawmakers introduced a ballot initiative seeking to raise the approval rate to 60% for future ballot questions.

“The biggest irony of all is that it passed, but only with 58% of the vote,” Jewett said.

The Florida Chamber of Commerce, which pushed for the 60% change, argued that it would prevent the most controversial proposals from passing.

Today, Florida’s 60% threshold makes it tougher — but not impossible — for progressive initiatives to get enacted, like restoring felon rights, raising the minimum wage, and legalizing medical marijuana.

But Tuesday’s election proved the challenges ahead since Republicans have made big gains in Florida and the state turns redder, Jewett said.

“The majority of Floridians spoke last night. They do not want this (six-week abortion) ban. They made it very loud and very clear,” said Lauren Brenzel, Yes on 4 campaign director, after 57% supported Amendment 4. “And had we been any other state, we would be celebrating right now.”

Gabrielle Russon

Gabrielle Russon is an award-winning journalist based in Orlando. She covered the business of theme parks for the Orlando Sentinel. Her previous newspaper stops include the Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Toledo Blade, Kalamazoo Gazette and Elkhart Truth as well as an internship covering the nation’s capital for the Chicago Tribune. For fun, she runs marathons. She gets her training from chasing a toddler around. Contact her at [email protected] or on Twitter @GabrielleRusson .


5 comments

  • Arturo

    November 6, 2024 at 3:16 pm

    Naive, uninformed. 60% was a result of Big Business, Big Medical and plaintiffs bar getting together after incredibly expensive med mal referendum. Both sides agreed that these Uber expensive ballot questions need to be stopped.

    Reply

  • Michael

    November 6, 2024 at 3:21 pm

    It is what it is in Florida. After all, it has by far the largest number of senile citizens, I mean, senior citizens, per square mile of any state in the union.
    You can’t really expect their failing minds and already failed bodies to render any consideration for the bodies of others.

    Reply

    • Kammy Is Toast

      November 6, 2024 at 4:36 pm

      You talking about Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi?

      Reply

  • rbruce

    November 6, 2024 at 3:50 pm

    50.1% is too low a measure to change the State Constitution.

    Reply

  • Rita Joseph

    November 6, 2024 at 4:03 pm

    Ballots can’t change our moral obligations. No state’s ballot results can set aside the US Constitution’s founding principle that forbids the deliberate killing of our fellow human beings.
    There can be no ballot results that can set aside the US Constitution’s founding principle that forbids the deliberate killing of our fellow human beings. Both science and reason tell us that our unborn children are fellow human beings, smaller than us but already belonging to our human family. Once conceived, each new human being is already one of us—the very same human being from conception to natural death—unique, lovable, always deserving of our protection.
    The Founders recognized the “self-evident” truth that, for all human beings created equal, their right to life is the unalienable gift of “their Creator.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704