John Rutherford won’t comment on Matt Gaetz, House Ethics report

rutherford
The Jacksonville Republican previously objected to Gaetz pushing for removal of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

A North Florida Congressman has nothing to say about a former colleague and a committee investigation into alleged misdeeds.

But one can read between the lines based on a fractious past history.

U.S. Rep. John Rutherford of Jacksonville, who represents Florida’s 5th Congressional District, did not engage questions about former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz and a House Ethics report that won’t be released as expected this week.

The committee was to vote Friday on making the report public, but Gaetz’s resignation blocked the move to transparency.

Asked if he was “surprised” by Gaetz’s nomination for Attorney General, the former Sheriff hedged.

“I’m not making any comments on that. I’m on the Ethics Committee, so I’m staying clear of that one,” Rutherford said.

Rutherford was an ally of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and he memorably objected to the coup Gaetz led against the California Republican.

He accused Gaetz of having “led House Democrats and a handful of dissenters in handing the House back to the Far Left,” adding that it was “a lie to characterize this as anything but a personal vendetta.”

The House Ethics Committee inquiry was still probing whether Gaetz engaged in sexual misconduct or illegal drug use, and whether he granted special favors to romantic interests.

In June, Gaetz proclaimed his innocence in matters declared resolved.

“The House Ethics Committee has closed four probes into me, which emerged from lies intended solely to smear me,“ Gaetz posted on X. “Instead of working with me to ban Congressional stock trading, the Ethics Committee is now opening new frivolous investigations. They are doing this to avoid the obvious fact that every investigation into me ends the same way: my exoneration.”

In June, the committee lamented the “difficulty in obtaining relevant information from Representative Gaetz and others,” but suggested an exhaustive review of evidence, including conversations “with more than a dozen witnesses … 25 subpoenas and (review of) thousands of pages of documents in this matter.”

___

Jacob Ogles of Florida Politics contributed to this report.

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has been the Northeast Florida correspondent for Florida Politics since 2014. He writes for the New York Post and National Review also, with previous work in the American Conservative and Washington Times and a 15+ year run as a columnist in Folio Weekly. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


2 comments

  • Ocean Joe

    November 15, 2024 at 10:32 am

    The folks over in the senate will now have to choose between subservient loyalty to Trump vs. the best interests of the country and everybody knows Trump owns them, so to avoid being responsible they’ll go with the recess appointment deal to avoid having to vote against the Don’s pet.

    Reply

    • MH/Duuuval

      November 15, 2024 at 5:28 pm

      It can’t be easy keeping one’s skirts clean in a MAGA Congress.

      Rutherford’s edge comes from wearing a roscoe all the time. That has to be respected by MAGA bullies.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704