Florida Supreme Court seeks more Judges, describes workload impacts

Florida Supreme Court in Tallahassee
A growing state needs more resources for justice.

A new year could bring more judgeships if the highest court in the state has its way.

The Florida Supreme Court is making the case for 50 more lower-level Judges in an opinion released Thursday.

The opinion precedes the Legislative Session, as lawmakers must authorize the additional Judges based on the constitutional directive to the court to make its recommendation.

The high court wants 23 more circuit court judgeships (seven of which are in the 20th Circuit), 25 county court judgeships (including seven in Miami-Dade), and a pair of additional district court judgeships on the Lakeland-based 6th District Court of Appeal, which came into existence last year after legislative authorization.

Impacts on the newest appellate court are such that a Judge is on loan from a different circuit currently.

The Supreme Court says no decrease is needed in circuit court judgeships, county court judgeships, or district court judgeships, but does contend that “excess judicial capacity” in the 2nd District Court of Appeal should be handled by attrition. That means new Judges wouldn’t be hired as vacancies arise in the Tampa-based court.

Also in the ruling, the Supreme Court released findings from its most recent survey of Judges regarding the time spent on cases and its impact on the “quality of justice.” The workload study was conducted last year. It was the first in eight years as the pandemic delayed the normal five-year cycle.

The argument laid out in the opinion is that the increased complexity of some cases, particularly civil disputes, require more time for case management than was previously thought.

The same conditions apply to “the review and hearing of non-dispositive pretrial motions in circuit and county criminal cases; the review and hearing of dispositive pretrial motions in circuit civil cases; the preparation of findings and orders related to trials and final hearings in circuit family cases; and the hearing of cases involving pro se litigants and interpreters.”

A.G. Gancarski

A.G. Gancarski has been the Northeast Florida correspondent for Florida Politics since 2014. His work also can be seen in the Washington Post, the New York Post, the Washington Times, and National Review, among other publications. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter: @AGGancarski


One comment

  • MH/Duuuval

    December 12, 2024 at 12:59 pm

    Any work product produced by the DeSantis Supreme Court ought to be subject to intensely skeptical scrutiny.

    Question: How many bogus suits brought before the Supreme Court itself have been lawfare cases by the highly litigious Dee-Moody administration?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704