Wisconsin and Florida elections provide early warning signs to Trump and Republicans
Voters leave the Old Blanco Courthouse after casting their ballots, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, in Blanco, Texas. After a grinding presidential campaign President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, yield center stage to American voters Tuesday for an Election Day choice that will frame the contours of government and the nation for years to come. (AP Photo/Eric Gay) ORG XMIT: TXEG104

Texas Votes
In Wisconsin, voters say billionaire Elon Musk tried to interfere with the election too much.

A trio of spring elections provided early warning signs to Republicans and President Donald Trump on Tuesday, as Democrats rallied against his efforts to slash the federal government and the outsize role being played by billionaire Elon Musk in the early days of his new administration.

In the marquee race for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat, the conservative judge endorsed by Trump and backed by Musk and his groups to the tune of $21 million lost by 10 percentage points in a state Trump won in November. And while Florida Republicans held two of the most pro-Trump House districts in the country, both candidates underperformed Trump’s November margins.

The elections — the first major contests since Trump’s return to power — were seen as an early measure of voter sentiment as Trump works with unprecedented speed to dramatically upend the federal government, clashing with the courts and seeking revenge as he tests the bounds of presidential power.

The party that loses the presidency in November typically picks up seats in the next midterm elections, and Tuesday’s results provided hope for Democrats — who have faced a barrage of internal and external criticism about their response to Trump — that they can follow that trend.

Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist and podcaster whose group worked alongside Musk to boost conservative Brad Schimel in Wisconsin, argued Tuesday’s Supreme Court loss underscored a fundamental challenge for Republicans, particularly in races where Trump is not on the ballot.

“We did a lot in Wisconsin, but we fell short. We must realize and appreciate that we are the LOW PROP party now,” he said in an X post, referring to low-propensity voters who don’t regularly cast ballots. “The party has been remade. Special elections and off-cycle elections will continue to be a problem without a change of strategy.”

Trump won Wisconsin in November by 0.8 percentage points, or fewer than 30,000 votes. In the first major test since he took office in January, the perennial battleground state shifted significantly to the left, and not only in typical Democratic strongholds.

Sauk County, northwest of the state capital of Madison, is a state bellwether. Trump won it in November by 626 votes. Sauk shifted 16 percentage points in the direction of Judge Susan Crawford, the liberal backed by national Democrats and billionaire donors like George Soros.

Besides strong turnout in Democratic-heavy areas, Crawford did measurably better in the suburban Milwaukee counties that Republicans rely on to run up their margins statewide.

Crawford won Kenosha and Racine counties, both of which went for Trump over Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. She won by about 10 percentage points there.

Turnout was just under 50%, a full 10 percentage points higher than the previous record high for a Wisconsin Supreme Court election, set just two years ago.

In interviews with dozens of voters across the state, including more than 20 in Waunakee, a politically mixed town north of Madison, many Democrats suggested without prompting that their vote was as much if not more of a repudiation of Trump’s first months in office than a decision on the direction of the state high court.

“This is our chance to say no,” said Linda Grassl, a retired OB-GYN registered nurse, after voting at the Waunakee Public Library corridor Tuesday.

“We have to fight, and this is where the fight is today,” agreed Theresa Peer, a 49-year-old business-owner born and raised in Milwaukee, who called the election a “fight for our democracy.” She said she hoped a Crawford win would serve as a “symbol of opposition” to the Trump administration, particularly on the issues of women’s reproductive rights and slashed education spending.

Others disliked the richest man in the world playing such a prominent role.

“I don’t like Elon Musk spending money for an election he should have no involvement in,” said Antonio Gray, a 38-year-old Milwaukee security guard. “They should let the voters vote for who they want to vote for instead of inserting themselves like they have.”

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, in a floor speech Wednesday, called the results “a political warning shot from the American people” and a sign that “Democrats’ message is resonating.”

“Just 70 days into Trump 2.0, Americans are tired of the chaos. They are tired of Elon Musk attacking Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare,” he said.

Former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said that part of the challenge for Republicans had been “trying to connect the dots” to turn the state Supreme Court race into one about Trump — a difficult task in a state judicial race. He wondered if the outcome would have been different had Trump paid a visit to the state instead of hosting a telephone town hall.

“If you’re somebody who showed up for Trump because you feel forgotten, you don’t typically show up to vote in” these kinds of elections, he said, imagining voters asking themselves: “What does this have to do with Trump?”

Still, Walker cautioned against reading the tea leaves too closely.

“I’d be a little bit careful about reading too much into what happens nationally,” he said.

Trump had better luck in Florida, where Republican Randy Fine won his special election in the 6th District to replace Mike Waltz, who stepped down to serve as Trump’s national security adviser. But Fine beat his Democratic challenger, Josh Weil, by 14 percentage points less than five months after Waltz won the district by 33.

“This is the functional equivalent of Republicans running a competitive race in the district that is represented by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,” said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries beforehand, invoking a liberal favorite whom Trump often denigrates. “Kamala Harris won that district by 30 points. Do you think a Republican would even be competitive in that district in New York, currently held by Alex? Of course, not.”

Jimmy Patronis, the state’s chief financial officer, fended off a challenge from Democrat Gay Valimont to win the northwest Florida seat vacated by Matt Gaetz but also underperformed Gaetz’s last margin of victory.

The pair of wins gave Republicans a 220-213 margin in the House of Representatives, when concerns about a thin GOP majority led Trump to pull the nomination of New York Rep. Elise Stefanik to be United Nations ambassador.

For voters in both districts, the clear draw was Trump.

Teresa Horton, 72, didn’t know much at all about Tuesday’s election — but said she didn’t need to.

“I don’t even know these people that are on there,” she said of her ballot. “I just went with my ticket.”

Brenda Ray, 75, a retired nurse, said she didn’t know a lot about Patronis, either, but cast her ballot for him because she believes he’ll “vote with our president.”

“That’s all we’re looking for,” she said.

Both Patronis and Fine were badly outraised by their Democratic challengers. Michael Whatley, chairman of the Republican National Committee, argued that what was a GOP concern before Tuesday night had been a sign of the party’s strength.

“The American people sent a clear message tonight: they want elected officials who will advance President Trump’s America First agenda, and their votes can’t be bought by national Democrats,” he said in a statement.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.

Associated Press


7 comments

  • Ron Ogden

    April 2, 2025 at 1:07 pm

    Always Proggy strikes again. Lets look at the facts. The Republicans now have more power in Washington than they did yesterday (or will, once sworn in ) because of elections that can be described as “strong” in the case of Patronis or “landslide” in the case of Fine. But the Always P spends the great majority of its story trying to build a narrative of national dissatisfaction based upon the result of an obscure judge election in Wisconsin’s college town, where running as a Republican like her opponent did can be compared to running in downtown Boston. Oh, and by the way, Proggy, Wisconsin voters overwhelmingly voted for. . .wait for it. . . identification requirements for voters. I guess we won’t see the Proggy reporting that story; not on the agenda.

    Reply

    • JD

      April 2, 2025 at 1:28 pm

      What makes you think people don’t want voting identification and progressive values? Why do you try to make everything a binary choice when it’s not and try to wrap up all the other stuff into it? That’s LYING by conflation. You don’t sound unintelligent, so that leaves you are evil. See what I did there? That binary choice…

      Reply

      • PeterH

        April 2, 2025 at 1:36 pm

        Good thoughtful retort JD

        Reply

        • JD

          April 2, 2025 at 1:46 pm

          Thank you.

          Reply

          • Aldo Harding

            April 2, 2025 at 2:29 pm

            I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $27 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply ,

            GO ON MY PROFILE

      • Ron Ogden

        April 2, 2025 at 2:36 pm

        The point, JD, is just the opposite. I object to the media cobbling together insupportable narratives that characterize local elections as reflecting national trends a la’ “. . .early warning signs to Republicans and President Donald Trump on Tuesday, as Democrats rallied against his efforts to slash the federal government. . .” A judge in a small midWestern state won a seat. That means absolutely nothing nationally. But the AP will grasp at any straw at hand as it struggles to keep afloat the idea that Donald Trump will fail. THAT is lying by conflation. The important story of yesterday’s elections is that the Republicans continue to gain greater control of Congress. That is what is important, as any neutral observer can appreciate. That, of course, does not include the Always Proggy news service, FLAPOL, nor quite a few of its commentators.

        Reply

        • JD

          April 2, 2025 at 3:04 pm

          Come on, now. You’re acting like the Wisconsin Supreme Court race was just a sleepy little local election. Let’s not pretend this was some obscure county clerk seat. This was a statewide election, in a key battleground state, for the highest court in Wisconsin, the same court that will likely rule on voting rights, redistricting, and possibly even future election disputes. And it flipped the balance of power. That’s not nothing.

          Also, let’s not forget Elon and his $25 million dumped into the right-wing media and influence machine. Billionaires don’t throw around that kind of money for races that “mean absolutely nothing.”

          And while you’re throwing shade at the AP for “lying by conflation,” what do you call claiming that Republicans are gaining “greater control of Congress” as the takeaway — when, factually, no major congressional shift occurred yesterday? If anything, that is conflation, pretending that small victories or red-leaning districts holding steady somehow amount to a national wave. Spoiler: they don’t.

          As for “struggling to keep afloat the idea that Trump will fail”, Trump’s legal troubles, the GOP’s growing suburban losses, and abortion rights wins in red states are doing plenty to suggest that failure might not be far-fetched. And when those “local” races keep showing similar patterns, maybe it’s not narrative-spinning … maybe it’s just reality knocking.

          You don’t have to like the results. But pretending they don’t matter? That’s just denial in a clever suit.

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, Liam Fineout, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Andrew Powell, Jesse Scheckner, Janelle Taylor, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704