
With predictions for a busy hurricane season beginning Sunday, experts in storms and disasters are worried about something potentially as chaotic as the swirling winds: Massive cuts to the federal system that forecasts, tracks and responds to hurricanes.
Experts are alarmed over the large-scale staff reductions, travel and training restrictions and grant cut-offs since President Donald Trump took office at both the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which prepares for and responds to hurricanes, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which tracks and forecasts them.
“My nightmare is a major catastrophic storm hitting an area that is reeling from the impact of all of this nonsense from the Trump administration and people will die. And that could happen in Florida, that could happen in Texas, that could happen in South Carolina,” said Susan Cutter, the director of the Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina.
Representatives of both NOAA and FEMA say the agencies are prepared.
About 2,000 full-time staff have left FEMA since Trump took office in January, a loss of roughly one-third of the agency’s full-time workforce, amid Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mandated cuts. Scholars who study emergency management are concerned by both the reduction in capacity and the “brain drain” of experienced staff.
The agency is run by an acting chief, David Richardson, a former Marine Corps officer who served overseas and worked as the Department of Homeland Security’s assistant secretary for countering weapons of mass destruction. He does not appear to have any experience in managing disasters.
What’s happening reminds former Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Craig Fugate of 2005, the year Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana and exposed inexperienced and poorly prepared governments at all levels, especially the then-FEMA chief who came from a horse-rearing association. Fugate said he’s especially worried about top experienced disaster people leaving FEMA.
FEMA canceled various emergency management trainings this spring, moved others online and restricted travel to events such as the National Hurricane Conference. Some trainings have resumed.
“Given the reduction in staffing, being unable to do trainings, participate in conferences, there’s potential that the federal government’s ability is diminished,’’ said former Florida Emergency Management chief Bryan Koon, now president of the disaster preparedness firm IEM.
FEMA has also cut disaster resilience programs. Making areas more survivable saves up to $13 for every dollar spent, said Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado.
The federal government promises to be ready for hurricane season, which runs through November.
“FEMA is shifting from bloated DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,” Associate FEMA Administrator Geoff Harbaugh said in a email. “FEMA is fully activated in preparation for hurricane season.”
Richardson promised to push more responsibilities to the states. He warned that the agency will only do what the law requires and shift more costs to states.
But Koon noted that states haven’t budgeted for FEMA’s changes, adding: “The biggest issue right now is just the uncertainty.”
Some states — which coordinate disaster operations — are experienced in catastrophes, have well trained staff and will do fine, such as Texas and Florida, Fugate said. But it’s the poorer states that worry the experts.
The feds often pick up the entire bill in big disasters and most of it in smaller ones. In the Trump administration, disaster declarations have been denied or delayed. When disaster declarations were issued for nine states last week, some had been pending for two months and others were only partially approved.
NOAA, the parent agency of the National Weather Service, has undergone a series of dramatic job cuts, with some people then reinstated. A sizable chunk of the weather service’s 121 local field offices as of late March had vacancy rates of more than 20%, what’s seen by outsiders as a critical level of understaffing. Local weather offices are crucial in helping people translate national warnings into what to do locally.
But the National Hurricane Center, which tracks and warns of hurricanes in the Atlantic, Pacific and Caribbean, has been spared. Acting NOAA Administrator Laura Grimm, National Weather Service Director Ken Graham and National Hurricane Center Director Michael Brennan said the agency is prepared for the season with the Miami-based storm center fully staffed and so are the planes that fly into storms.
For the first time this year, the hurricane center will incorporate artificial intelligence into forecasting because it has shown to improve predictions generally, Brennan said.
“Our services have never been better,” Graham said. “Our ability to serve this country has never been better. And it will be this year as well.”
But beyond the hurricane center, weather balloons launches have been curtailed because of lack of staffing. In some places, balloon launches have dropped from twice a day to once a day.
NOAA hopes to get more balloons launched if needed, Brennan said.
___
Republished with permission of the Associated Press.
3 comments
MarvinM
May 31, 2025 at 8:50 pm
“For the first time this year, the hurricane center will incorporate artificial intelligence into forecasting because it has shown to improve predictions generally, Brennan said.”
I’m skeptical of that, but before getting into any sort of arguments pro or con about that, the real threat this real, AI or no AI, is is we have less data that we have had in the past, and if the average everyday person is not able to get that data as quickly and often as they have in the past.
AI can’t help predict hurricane direction better than RI (Real Intelligence) if they only have data from one weather balloon a day rather than two, as just a simple example. Or a less frequent number of Hurricane Hunter flights.
Hurricane predictions (once storms have formed) have been incredibly accurate overall for at least the last 15 years. Strength, speed, landfall, have all been very close, close enough for people to make reasonable preparations to ride out a storm in place, or decide, based on their circumstances, to evacuate. I fear with the cuts we will not be getting enough timely and accurate information to make those what could end up being life or death decisions.
The worst thing that could happen is everybody panicking and all
trying to go to shelters because they think the hurricane is coming straight to their house. The shelters will become overcrowded and people will end up stranded and die.
The also worst thing that could happen would be that hardly anybody goes to a shelter. They decide to remain in their homes because they are sure a hurricane is not coming straight to their house and then it does and people die.
Accurate information, disseminated widely, freely, and often, is what we need to make the best decisions to keep ourselves, our families, our property, and our pets safe this hurricane season.
Michael K
May 31, 2025 at 10:18 pm
Don’t worry about forecasting and assistance. There’s a Sharpie ready with “alternative facts” in addition to “Grimm” assessments.
Besides, we’re all gonna die anyway. Right?
Linwood Wright
May 31, 2025 at 11:26 pm
Don’t worry. After the next hurricane, Trump will come on down and hand Tacos out to people.