Corrine Brown Archives - Page 7 of 34 - Florida Politics

New money pours in for Al Lawson, Glo Smith in CD 5 race

With less than two weeks to go until the last votes are cast in the race to replace Rep. Corrine Brown in Florida’s 5th Congressional District, Democrat Al Lawson and Republican Glo Smith continue raising money.

Of the two candidates, Lawson is showing more strength down the stretch.

Lawson raised $21,000 between Oct. 20 and Oct. 24, highlighted by $5,000 contributions from the Service Employees International Union and the National Beer Wholesalers Association.

Smith wasn’t too far behind.

Her $16,000 raised in the last week came from individual contributors, mostly associated with two medical clinics outside of the district.

While there has been parity in terms of recent contributions, Smith has a lot of ground to make up.

As of the October quarterly filing, Smith had $11,908 on hand, well behind Lawson, who had $79,309 on hand.

Lawson’s victory is perceived as being so certain we are hearing that Jacksonville Democrats — notably reticent when given opportunities to support him ahead of the primary against local fixture Corrine Brown — are vying for the plum position of running his legislative office in Duval County.

Corrine Brown/Ronnie Simmons fraud trial pushed back to April 2017

Tuesday’s status conference for Rep. Corrine Brown and her chief of staff, Ronnie Simmons, in a Jacksonville federal court laid out the basic framework for a multi-week trial beginning in April, involving dozens of witnesses, including members of Jacksonville’s donor class.

Meanwhile, there seemed to be daylight between strategy and preparation between the lawyers for Brown and Simmons, suggesting a practical reason for trying the defendants separately.

They agreed on one thing: citing voluminous discovery, both wanted a trial in June 2017.

The prosecution objected, however, saying February gave them enough time to review discovery.

Despite the compelling interest in a “speedy trial,” Judge Timothy Corrigan noted these defense lawyers came in in the middle of the case.

“This is a case that does require voluminous discovery,” Corrigan said, requiring review and contextualization of the material.

Corrigan offered a Solomonic compromise: a continuance to April 24, when jury selection begins, and the trial would be tried to conclusion beginning April 26.

****

The two co-defendants face 24 counts related to the One Door for Education charity, which Brown fundraised for over a period of years, yet which saw proceeds routed toward personal expenses for Brown and her inner circle.

Neither Brown nor Simmons attended the hearing, where the major intrigue was expected to be related to motions possibly filed by Brown’s team, including moving for separate trials of Brown and Simmons, attempting to introduce character witnesses, and a possible move toward dismissal of the case outright.

The prosecution, represented by A. Tysen Duva, noted “significant discovery” had been produced, and the defendants have those materials in hand.

James Smith, on behalf of Brown, noted in response there was a “significant matter” he had to discuss with the judge and counsel, related to his client.

As the sound of static filled the courtroom, the parties convened at the judge’s bench for several minutes.

Smith then pushed for a June trial, given the most recent disclosure from prosecutors was on Friday, and had hundreds of pages of documents spanning events that took place in Florida and the D.C. area, and that dozens of witnesses would be required.

Smith also believes some of the motions that will come up, such as a prosecution precluding character evidence, is objectionable.

He also asserted that Simmons’ attorney might want to sever defendants, which accords with Smith’s own anticipated motion.

Judge Corrigan wanted clarity on Smith’s desire to sever defendants; Smith asserted that motion likely is pending.

The motion to dismiss that Smith hinted at in his list of anticipated motions was, he said, filed in an “abundance of caution.”

Smith also expressed concern over evidence brought regarding things not charged in the 47-page indictment.

Regarding his review of discovery, Smith noted there is testimony from a few dozen grand jury witnesses and lots of paper.

Smith noted that, with allegations of a shopping trip in Los Angeles and trips to Jersey, it is incumbent on his side to establish “charitable purposes.”

“This is a case that is national in scope,” Smith said, and the discovery is “voluminous” and requires considerable time to process.

Simmons’ lawyer, Anthony Suarez, noted he has yet to get through all the discovery. Corrigan was irked, as Suarez decided to “blow through deadlines” related to the hard deadline to file anticipated motions on Oct. 18.

Corrigan was sharp.

“If I direct you to do something, you’ve got to do it. I’m not going to have you just ignore it,” the judge said.

Suarez expressed worry about the grand jury selection process, and said he’s “still in the process” of evaluating the motion to sever defendants.

Suarez also expressed concern about the voluminous discovery, which he described as a “daunting task.”

Also daunting: Simmons lives in Maryland, which impacts “the length of time before I get an answer to some questions that pop up in the discovery material.”

Long story short, Suarez joined Smith in seeking a June trial commencement.

Duva said a February start was “realistic,” given his side’s consistent production of discovery documents.

The “voluminous” discovery burden is mooted, to some degree, by the limited amount of the evidence that will be presented at trial, plus the fairly simple outlining of the scheme to defraud.

Duva said it was “misleading” to say the discovery consisted of more than “manageable information.”

“This is a very clear presentation of the theory of the case,” Duva said, and “a February trial provides defense counsel with a five-month opportunity” to review the case.

Expected in the multi-week trial: 40 to 50 government witnesses, including One Door for Education’s head Carla Wiley (now cooperating with the prosecution) and members of the political donor class, including one-time and repeat donors, said prosecutor Duva, who estimated he may need 10 to 12 trial days to make the government’s case.

Duva floated the possibility of a “plea from one defendant” that could change the trial parameters, even while both defendants claim to want to go to trial.

“We have made every effort,” Duva said, “to guide the defense in the discovery.”

****

After a recess, Judge Corrigan emerged with questions.

Corrigan wanted to know if there would be an expert witness.

Brown’s lawyer said there may be a forensic accountant on his side.

Corrigan also wanted an idea of how long the defense would take. Smith expects to need at least five days for Brown’s defense; Suarez predicted needing a day or two more for his defense of Simmons.

All told, the case may take three to four weeks to try, including jury selection, which Corrigan said “might take longer than average” given the high profile of the defendants.

Motions will be filed in December. Another status conference will be set for Jan. 9 at 1:30, when rulings will be made on motions.

The most interesting motion: whether or not the co-defendants will be severed, as both defense teams seem to want.

****

Another status conference is set for March 23 ahead of the April 26 trial, with jury selection beginning April 24.

Defendants will have to be there for both status conferences.

“That setting gives the defendants an appropriate amount of time to do the things they need to do,” Corrigan said.

Status conference in Corrine Brown trial slated for Tuesday

Neither U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown nor her chief of staff Ronnie Simmons are required to be at Tuesday’s status conference in their federal trial.

However, in the light of potential motions filed last week, Tuesday’s status conference nonetheless may offer a preview of what will happen for the next few months leading up to the trial.

The defense listed a motion to admit admissible character evidence, a motion to sever defendants, and a motion to dismiss.

Brown has hinted at character evidence throughout the period this trial has been an active concern, telling reporters on more than one occasion she personally had committed charitable acts, such as sending students to China and buying computers for schoolrooms in her district to help them conquer the “digital divide.”

Of course, the claim made by prosecutors is that the One Door for Education charity marketed using Rep. Brown’s name and likeness. And despite the roughly $800,000 the charity took in over years, much of it personally benefited Brown and Simmons, with under $2,000 going to charitable purposes.

Prosecutors likely will seek to cleave Brown’s personal charity from the actions of this foundation.

The motion to sever defendants is of interest also. As Lynnsey Gardner of News 4 Jax reported after an interview with Brown’s lawyer, the defense will contend Brown was too busy for such a conspiracy and was exploited by her inner circle.

“The idea that Congresswoman Corrine Brown had any time to engage in a conspiracy or a fraud just doesn’t match with everything I know about her,” said Smith.

“Unfortunately, when you are in office, and the perks of that office. Unfortunately people want to take advantage of you. One thing people need to remember is Carla Wiley has entered a plea of guilty. She admits she set up the charity and used the initial proceeds for herself,” Smith added.

Wiley ran the One Door for Education charity and has pleaded guilty, but is “cooperating” with prosecutors ahead of her sentencing, slated for December.

The motion to sever defendants is notable as well.

If Brown is to contend she was exploited, she will need to roll over on Simmons. And in turn, he would feel compelled to do likewise.

The prosecution, meanwhile, has its own potential motions, including a motion to preclude inadmissible character evidence, a motion to preclude pleas for mercy to the jury and/or counsel arguing for jury nullification, and a motion to “preclude arguments that the government sought indictment due to improper motivation.”

In other words, the prosecution — which is very confident in the facts laid out in its 46-page indictment, which details repeated solicitations under Brown’s name for the charity, and numerous transactions ranging from securing box seats for Redskins games and Beyonce concerts to just withdrawing a few hundred dollars at a time for walking around money — has no intention of being subverted by the emotional appeal.

CD 5 Republican Glo Smith scores backing of NE Florida businessmen

Last week, FloridaPolitics.com observed that, regarding 5th Congressional District Republican candidate Glo Smith, the cavalry needed to get a move on if they wanted to boost her campaign.

In mid-October, it appears that may happen, as Smith announced meaningful support from key members of the Northeast Florida donor class … at long last.

“I’m proud and humbled to have the support from many of our key business leaders — and it shows the type of leader I will be in Washington,” Smith said. “I will start right away to help reform our system for Florida families.”

Among the notable names backing Smith are Toney Sleiman, a local strip-mall developer who takes an active role in Jacksonville politics, including backing Donald Trump heavily during the general election campaign.

“Glo knows business,” said Sleiman. “She’s a hard-working, conservative leader who will look at issues from a business perspective and work together to get things done in Washington.”

Also backing Smith are W.W. Gay and assorted others, listed below:

• Jacksonville businessman Mr. and Mrs. Lockwood Holmes of Jacksonville
• William W. “Bill” Gay, Eloise Gay and Bill Gay Jr. of W.W. Gay Mechanical Contractor Inc.
• Madison County farmer Bubba Greene
• Jacksonville businessman Chuck Parliament
• Jacksonville businessman Marvin Lane
• Dr. Roy Hinman of Jacksonville
Toney Sleiman, Sleiman Enterprises in Jacksonville
• Jacksonville businessman Ben Godbold
• Maggie’s List
• Mr. Mauro and Dr. Lillian Gines
• Mr. and Mrs. Tony (Jo) Knott
• Mr. and Mrs. R.C. (Lois)Mills

There is, to be sure, a real resource gap between Smith and Democrat Al Lawson, a veteran politician and lobbyist from Tallahassee who appears to be the frontrunner to replace Corrine Brown as CD 5 representative.

As of the October quarterly report, Smith’s campaign brought in $31,325 and spent $21,231, leaving her with $11,908 on hand at the end of the period.

Lawson, meanwhile, had $79,309 on hand.

Potential motions reveal strategy in Corrine Brown case may be to ‘sever defendants’

On Tuesday, both the prosecution and the defense filed a list of potential pre-trial motions in Rep. Corrine Brown‘s trial in 2017.

In doing so, both sides have illustrated their strategies.

The defense listed a motion to admit admissible character evidence; a motion to sever defendants; and a motion to dismiss.

These illustrate that Brown may contend she was used by Chief of Staff Ronnie Simmons or by Carla Wiley, who ran the One Door For Education charity. It was notable because of its lack of charitable contributions over the course of years, after $800,000 of contributions were raised using the congresswoman’s imprimatur.

Wiley, to be sentenced in December, is cooperating with prosecutors.

Brown and Simmons have functioned as co-defendants; however, there has been speculation that at some point one will turn on the other.

The prosecution, meanwhile, has its own potential motions, including a motion to preclude inadmissible character evidence; a motion to preclude pleas for mercy to the jury and/or counsel arguing for jury nullification; and a motion to “preclude arguments that the government sought indictment due to improper motivation.”

Corrine Brown won’t be ordered to pay redistricting plaintiffs

A federal judge has shut down a request from the winners of the congressional redistricting case for U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown to pay their attorney and expert witness bills of nearly $250,000.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker also denied a request to levy sanctions against Brown, saying her case “was meritless” but not “frivolous.” His order was entered late last month.

Brown, a 23-year Democratic congresswoman from north Florida, lost her primary against challenger Al Lawson in the wake of her indictment on charges that she and her chief of staff used a shell nonprofit as a “personal slush fund,” records show.

The League of Women Voters of Florida, Common Cause, and others had filed a motion against Brown after she unsuccessfully challenged them in federal court.

She had argued the state’s new congressional districts, ordered to be redrawn by the state Supreme Court, violated federal voting-rights law. A panel of federal judges later said Brown had “not proven (her) case.”

Brown’s seat changed from a north-south district that meandered from Jacksonville to Sanford, to an east-west district that runs from Jacksonville to rural Gadsden County.

The plaintiffs tacked on a “bill of costs” of $23,600 for the consultants they used, adding “expert witness fees” to their previous demand for an “award of attorneys’ fees,” estimated at $220,000.

They wanted a federal judge to “assess attorneys’ and expert fees against Congresswoman Brown because her (Voting Rights Act) and constitutional claims were frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation,” their motion said.

Walker’s order also noted Brown had “voluntarily dismiss(ed her) appeal to the United States Supreme Court,” and “plaintiffs and defendants likewise filed a Joint Stipulation, dismissing all claims related to this action.”

Florida Democratic delegation calls on Rick Scott to extend registration deadline to Oct. 14

(UPDATE) As Gov. Rick Scott continues to offer updates on Hurricane Matthew while it slowly moves up Florida’s Atlantic Coast, members of Florida’s Democratic delegation are calling on him to extend the voter registration deadline from next Tuesday to Friday, Oct. 14.

“We strongly urge you to extend the deadline for our citizens to register to vote in November’s election, at least from October 11th to October 14th,” reads the letter. “It goes without saying that our democracy is stronger when more people vote. With a natural disaster on our doorstep, registering to vote understandably will not be possible in the immediate aftermath of such a significant storm. Of course, clean up and dealing with storm-related damage will be many Floridians’ primary focus.”

The letter was sent by Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and co-signed by Sen. Bill Nelson, and Congress members Alcee Hastings, Corrine Brown, Kathy Castor, Ted Deutch, Frederica Wilson, Alan Grayson, Lois Frankel, Patrick Murphy, and Gwen Graham.

Scott rejected such a request made on Thursday by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

“I’m not going to extend it,” the governor told reporters Thursday. “Everybody has had a lot of time to register. On top of that, we have lots of opportunities to vote: early voting, absentee voting, Election Day. So I don’t intend to make any changes.”

Another Republican governor whose state is preparing to be hit by Hurricane Matthew, South Carolina’s Nikki Haley, has extended her state’s registration deadline, which was scheduled for Saturday. That prompted the ACLU of Florida to join the Democratic delegation in calling on Scott to extend Florida’s registration deadline.

Later on Friday the ACLU of Florida made their own request to extend the voter registration deadline.

“This is a simple, non-partisan request for the governor to use his authority to ensure that every eligible voter has the opportunity to participate in this important election,” said ACLU of Florida Executive Director Howard Simon. “Preparing our state for a natural disaster and enabling full and fair participation in our democratic process aren’t mutually exclusive – in fact, they should go hand in hand.”

There has been some speculation the Democrats may sue Scott to extend the registration deadline if he doesn’t adhere to their request. But as election expert Rick Hasen wrote on Thursday in Slate, Scott could be sued for actually extending the deadline on the basis that such an extension is illegal, since only the Florida Legislature is allowed to set the rules on presidential elections.

The request to extend the deadline is hardly trivial, as parts of the state contend with the hurricane. As as has been widely reported in the past 24 hours, University of Florida political science professor Dan Smith has estimated “roughly” 50,000 people were registered in Florida over the last five days before the deadline in 2012.

Read the letter below:

Dear Governor Scott:

Thank you for your leadership and all of the hard work that you and state employees are doing to ensure the safety and security of Floridians as we prepare for Hurricane Matthew and related tropical storm and hurricane watches and warnings.

We appreciate your steady communication with federal, state, and local leaders, as well as public health, transportation, and law enforcement experts, to ensure our state is fully prepared for evacuations, shelter openings, prevention of power outages, monitoring of fuel supply, search and rescue, and provisioning of resources and supplies.

As you have rightly cautioned our citizens, Hurricane Matthew is a life-threatening storm that Floridians must take seriously, or risk being killed by it. President Obama has officially declared Hurricane Matthew’s expected impact in Florida to be a federal emergency, and we will work with you to ensure Florida has the federal recovery resources and support we need.

Some of the potential impacts of the storm include structural damage to even the sturdiest buildings, which will be worsened by large airborne projectiles, and make some locations uninhabitable for months. In addition, we can expect trees to snap or uproot, rendering many roads impassable and causing widespread power and communications outages.

The federal government has further cautioned that surging and deadly winds are not the only areas of concern — major rainfall flooding can also be life-threatening, with rivers and tributaries rapidly overflowing their banks, causing flood control systems and barriers to become stressed, and escape routes to become submerged.

The bottom line is that Floridians do not and should not have anything on their minds right now other than keeping themselves and their families safe from what could be a historic Category 4 blow to a large part of our state. As a result, it will be logistically challenging and likely impossible for many who would like to register to vote to be able to do so before the impending deadline on October 11th.

We strongly urge you to extend the deadline for our citizens to register to vote in November’s election, at least from October 11th to October 14th. It goes without saying that our democracy is stronger when more people vote.  With a natural disaster on our doorstep, registering to vote understandably will not be possible in the immediate aftermath of such a significant storm. Of course, clean up and dealing with storm-related damage will be many Floridians’ primary focus.

Therefore, we respectfully request an extension of the voter registration deadline so that we may ensure the franchise, the integrity of our democracy, and the rights we as Americans hold dear, are fully protected.

As elected officials, we must do all that we can to keep our citizens safe as well as safeguard the freedom of every individual to elect their representatives, from the state house to the White House.

 

 

Protective Order imposed in Corrine Brown ‘One Door for Education’ case

On Tuesday, Federal Judge James Klindt imposed a protective order on evidence in the “One Door for Education” case involving Rep. Corrine Brown and her chief of staff.

The two face 24 criminal counts related to an allegedly fraudulent charity, which solicited and collected $800,000 over a period of years, but distributed less than $2,000 under its charitable auspices.

The prosecutors wanted the protective order imposed on evidence because of its confidential nature; it contains sensitive and confidential information about defendants and “others, many of whom wouldn’t testify at trial.”

Rep. Brown, as of Sept. 21, “no longer opposes” the order.

The order will be a substitute for the “temporary” protective order put in place last July, shortly after the indictment of Brown and her chief of staff.

Stakes are high in this case.

The congresswoman from Florida’s 5th Congressional District, along with Chief of Staff Elias Simmons, face a combined 24 charges, enumerated in a 46-page indictment.

Brown faces a possible 357 years in prison and $4.8 million fine if all counts are found valid.

For Simmons, it would be as many as 355 years and $4.75 million, if guilty of all counts.

The estimated restitution for Brown would be $833,000 — plus $63,000 in tax — roughly $897,000. For Simmons, the number would be over $1.2 million.

Rick Mullaney on moderating the upcoming Al Lawson/Glo Smith debate

Though it’s somewhat under the radar since Corrine Brown lost the primary, there is a competitive election in Florida’s 5th Congressional District this year.

Tallahassee Democrat Al Lawson takes on Jacksonville Republican Glo Smith.

As compared to the primary, when candidates hustled around the east-west district to forums, joint candidate appearances are few and far between thus far in the general election period.

One notable opportunity, however, has been slated for such: the Southside Business Men’s Club has scheduled a debate between Lawson and Smith on Oct. 12 during the noon hour at the San Jose County Club in Jacksonville.

Moderating the non-televised event is Rick Mullaney, a former city general counsel, mayoral chief of staff, and mayoral candidate who now helms the Jacksonville University Public Policy Institute.

Mullaney expects the debate format to be familiar to those who have watched the seven televised debates from Jacksonville University over the last year and a half. There will be opening and closing statements, and alternating questions with each candidate given the opportunity to respond, in what Mullaney expects to be a “real discussion of policy” rather than politics.

And that “substantive” policy discussion will be tailored toward Northeast Florida concerns, including issues related to international trade and the dredging of the St. Johns River to deepen the port, issues related to the military (including Mayport), and issues related to transportation.

When asked if Smith had an advantage over Lawson based on locality, Mullaney conceded that was the case, but that’s “not an advantage that can’t be overcome,” lauding Lawson’s performance in the August primary debate at Jacksonville University.

Smith should, because she is from here, have an advantage talking about Northeast Florida issues, and she will need it; Lawson has proven to be the stronger fundraiser thus far, with deep bipartisan connections throughout the state.

If Lawson were to win in November, it creates a situation Mullaney says is “new for Jacksonville [after] more than two decades with Corrine Brown.”

It would be incumbent upon city insiders and leaders to bring Lawson up to speed quickly on local concerns, should he be elected, “working with him very closely” on important issues such as deepening the port.

Another challenge to be faced: no matter who wins in Congressional District 4 or Congressional District 5, the reality is two rookies are going to D.C.

Thus, “getting them off to a quick start” is necessary, with local leadership “working closely with both,” Mullaney said.

Orlando facing prospect of all-freshman lineup in Congress

U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown and her nearly 24 years in Congress – gone.

U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson and his nearly six years in Congress – gone.

U.S. Rep. Daniel Webster and his nearly six years in Congress – gone, moved to an outside district.

U.S. Rep. John Mica and his nearly 24 years in Congress – more at risk than he’s faced in more than a decade.

This year, Orlando is losing most and potentially all its seniority, experience, leadership and clout in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Whoever gets elected, the voters’ choices for change may wind up being for the better. And in the long run, who knows, at this point, how effective the new class might become?

But at first it could be like replacing an entire college basketball team starting lineup with freshmen for the coming year. And it’s not about wins or losses. At least in the short term, it’s about attracting Washington’s attention to Central Florida’s needs and priorities, and about finding and bringing federal money for such discretionary goodies as transportation improvements, veterans’ facilities, military simulation center support, social services’ grants, and college and university research funding.

Might Central Florida’s next congressional starting line-up be able to compete?

“It certainly might have a big effect when you lose so many people who are established in Washington and have been serving this area for at least some time,” said University of Central Florida political scientist Aubrey Jewett. “How much it hurts will be determined by which party is in control of Congress. That’s going to play a big role.”

Technically, Orlando still has U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, the Rockledge Republican, assuming he wins re-election in Florida’s 8th Congressional District. But he’s always been first and foremost about the Space Coast, not the inland counties, though his district includes a sparsely-populated corner of Orange County.

Technically, Orlando may be picking up U.S. Rep. Ron DeSantis, the Flagler County Republican, whose newly-redrawn Florida’s 6th Congressional District, assuming he wins re-election, stretches into the northernmost Orlando suburbs in Volusia County. But his attention more likely would be focused east and north, from Daytona through St. Augustine, where his base always has been.

Technically, Orlando may be able to count on Webster, the Clermont Republican, assuming he wins re-election, because he’ll still be representing Orlando’s western-most suburbs in Lake County, if he’s elected in Florida’s 11th Congressional District. But he no longer has any responsibility toward Orlando voters. And any congressional clout Webster had was largely stripped away in 2015 anyway, after he first challenged John Boehner and then Paul Ryan for the house speakership. Insurgents who lose are not rewarded with shared power.

That leaves Mica, the Winter Park Republican who is the only Orlando-oriented member of Congress with a chance to still be in office next year. Suddenly he is getting a stiff challenge from Stephanie Murphy in a race the national Democrats are trying very hard to win, for Florida’s 7th Congressional District seat representing north Orange County and Seminole County. A poll commissioned by Democrats last week showed her in the margin of error against him.

Mica, first elected in 1992, is almost a poster child for how a member of Congress grows in power with seniority, key committee assignments, and longterm relationships, and using them to bring federal support for his district. SunRail, the Interstate 4 expansion, Orlando International Airport expansions, the Orlando Veterans Administration Medical Center, Orlando’s National Center for Simulation, and other Orlando projects have gotten federal approval and money, due in part to his his connections, and in part to his work with Brown, Grayson, and Webster, who had their own clout.

Mica makes congressional seniority and the power that comes with it a key part of his campaign message.

“I do have a senior position in Congress and because there are 435 members it takes many years to gain positions of importance,” he said.

Mica offers another advantage, as big brother to the new members of Congress. Orlando will have two freshmen for sure, either Democratic state Sen. Darren Soto or Republican businessman Wayne Liebnitzky in Grayson’s old Florida’s 9th Congressional District; and either Democratic former Orlando Police Chief Val Demings or retired businesswoman Thuy Lowe in Webster’s old Florida’s 10th Congressional District. Brown’s entire district is gone. First her district was pulled from Orlando in last year’s redistricting, then she lost her primary.

Statewide, there will be at least seven freshmen, out of 27 Florida members of Congress.

“If I’m re-elected one of the things I’m going to work with both Republicans and Democrats in my position – I’m fairly well respected – to help them get on committees that they want. Eventually they will benefit our community and our state, and of course our country too,” Mica said. “That’s one of my goals: to help place and mentor the new kids on the block.”

But there’s that word “if,” which seemed unnecessary and modest until recently, though Mica always says he never takes re-election for granted.

Mica also has political policy positions and records, particularly conservative views on social issues, which Murphy and the Democrats are portraying as out of step with the changing, younger, more diverse, more Democratic new CD 7, which covers much of north Orange County and all of Seminole County.

Murphy is asking voters to trade Mica’s seniority and experience for fresh ideas and more liberal policies. National Democrats are investing millions of dollars to help her knock off Mica. A recent poll – commissioned by Democrats – showed the race within the margin of error.

She also says that Congress simply doesn’t work anymore, adding that Mica votes with the Republican line 97 percent of the time. So his seniority is partisan, she said.

“I think seniority is important if you are willing to work across the aisle in a bipartisan manner and actually lead on issues,” she said.

She dismissed any notion that the next class of Orlando members of Congress would lack experience.

“I have deep experience in business, in national security and academia and I would be able to draw on those real-world experiences to bring fresh perspectives to Congress, and a willingness to work across the aisle to get things done,” Murphy said. “I’m excited about the prospect of having a trio of members of Congress representing the Orlando area who will be a powerhouse representing the area with fresh new ideas that actually represent the people as opposed to being very partisan.”

Meanwhile, Orlando leaders are bracing for changes that are likely to require them to start over in building relationships with member of Congress, whether Mica or Murphy wins. The lobbyists and institutional leaders across the region insist they play no political or partisan favorites – they just want someone they can talk to who can get things done.

“We’ve been very fortunate in terms of the team we have there, not just who’s there, but the length of them they’ve had there, and their abilities to be effective. I’m very mindful about the changes that might take place. I’ve had discussions with board members about what that might mean,” said Harry Barley, executive director of MetroPlan Orlando, Central Florida’s transportation planning agency.

He noted both Brown and Mica have had senior positions on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, saying, “They’ve worked well together over the years. I’m not sure they’ve agreed on anything other than transportation. But that’s been a very great team. They’ve both been very, very helpful to us.”

Michael Waldrop, chair of Orlando’s Veterans Advisory Council, said the issue is making sure the new members of Congress are willing to work together to forward veterans’ and defense concerns, which he said must be non-partisan matters.

“You would hope a newer delegation that represents us in Central Florida realizes this and if they can work together on any one or two topics then it is the defense of our nation nd supporting our veteran community,” he said.

UCF Senior Vice President Dan Holsenbeck, who has overseen the university’s lobbying for decades, said there is reason to be concerned, but ultimately reasons to be hopeful.

“Seniority is the way you get a principal voice in budgeting, the way you get access to make meaningfully comments on policy,” Holsenbeck said. “So if you lose your seniority in the eleciton, then it does have a significant impact on policy and budgeting, on persuasion opportunities.”

But, he added, new relationships eventually lead to new opportunities.

“We’ve done very well over the years, our president and others, to build new relationships,” he said. “That would be our challenge, to build new relationships of trust and support for UCF.”

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons