Senate panel OKs gambling overhaul bill, including Seminole provisions
State Sen. Bill Galvano

Bill Galvano

The Florida Senate has seemingly fast-tracked the chamber’s gambling overhaul for this year, as its first panel gave unanimous thumbs up to the measure one hour into a meeting that had been scheduled to last four.

The bill (SB 8) was cleared Wednesday by the Regulated Industries committee, which oversees gambling policy. It has only one more stop, Appropriations, before it can be heard on the floor. The 2017 Legislative Session begins March 7.

The measure ensures “substantial positive impacts for many years,” said bill sponsor Bill Galvano, the Bradenton Republican expected to be Senate President in 2018-20. He cited a figure of $375 million in “net economic impact” to state coffers, which could use the extra cash in what may be a tight budget year. 

“It’s about creating stability in a dubious marketplace,” he added. 

Though the Senate may be poised to finally pass gambling legislation after years of inaction, wild cards remain in the form of the House, which remains to averse to anything looking like gambling expansion, and the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

The bill folded in a new agreement with the Tribe that allows them to offer blackjack at all their casinos in return for a $3 billion cut over seven years in card game revenue share to the state.

“I’ve not received a formal response from the Seminole Tribe,” Galvano, the new president of the National Council of Legislators from Gaming Stateslater told reporters.

He helped craft the first gambling deal with the Tribe in 2010 when he was in the House. “I would expect that we will probably soon.”

Tribe spokesman Gary Bitner declined comment when reached later Wednesday.

Indeed, the Seminole Compact was supposed to be “a firewall against the further expansion of gambling,” No Casinos head John Sowinski told the panel. His group opposes the legislation.

Among a slew of provisions, the 112-page bill would allow for more slot machines across the state, approve the sale of lottery tickets at gas pumps, and legalize fantasy sports, but also would pare down the number of state gambling licenses, or pari-mutuel permits. 

Proponents who spoke Wednesday include Miami Gardens Mayor Oliver Gilbert III. He spoke in favor of the bill’s allowance for “decoupling,” in which the state would no longer require dog and horse tracks to run live races if they wish to offer other gambling, such as slots or cards. 

Pari-mutuels say they want decoupling because the audience for dog and horse races – and thus the money bet on them – continues to decline. But horse and dog interests dispute that and say it will kill their industry.

Without thoroughbred decoupling, however, the city’s Calder race track can’t sell its land to developers, and Gilbert says his city needs the potential development.

Despite being a city of 112,000, Miami Gardens has no movie theater, one sit-down restaurant and little retail shopping, Gilbert told the committee.

“Having a community takes more, and allowing gaming without racing does that,” he said. 

But former Lt. Gov. Jeff Kottkamp, now a lobbyist for Florida Greyhound Association, said the bill “breaks the public trust.”

“It was never contemplated that racetracks would be turned into casinos,” he said, referring to a provision that would expand slot machines to qualified tracks in the eight counties where voters OK’d them by referendum, including Brevard, Duval and Palm Beach.

“We’re looking at 24 hours a day, more games, more slots,” Kottkamp said, mentioning another section of the bill that increases hours gambling places can be open. He also told senators the industry purposefully designs slot machines “to be addictive.” 

“The last time a business made its product addictive was the tobacco industry,” he said.

Jim Rosica

Jim Rosica is the Tallahassee-based Senior Editor for Florida Politics. He previously was the Tampa Tribune’s statehouse reporter. Before that, he covered three legislative sessions in Florida for The Associated Press. Jim graduated from law school in 2009 after spending nearly a decade covering courts for the Tallahassee Democrat, including reporting on the 2000 presidential recount. He can be reached at [email protected].


2 comments

  • MICHAEL LAFROSCIA

    January 26, 2017 at 10:44 am

    “Pari-mutuels say they want decoupling because the audience for dog and horse races – and thus the money bet on them – continues to decline. But horse and dog interests dispute that and say it will kill their industry.”

    Para Mutuels are correct. The Horse and Dog racing industry has declined and it shouldn’t be connected to something else to stay alive. If it is prosperous it could stand alone and not need to worry about going out of business. Their argument is decoupling will kill their industry. That means racing is dead unless it has a lifeline which puts a strain on other business. It hurts the owners of the property where a land sale can’t occur. It dictates other areas of business (poker) under the same roof it resides and for what? It also continues to have animals die at a large rate which isn’t publicized in fear it will spark another controversial conversation.

    Horse and dog racers just don’t want to face the fact that it is time to fade. If the industry they have is so great why don’t they just allow decoupling. They are the ball and chain to a new era in gaming for Florida

  • Eric Keaton

    January 26, 2017 at 2:20 pm

    The SB.8 wishlist.?! LOL.!! Its nothing more than a convoluted can of worms. Galvano thinks this is 3d chess.? How different is 3d chess from 2d chess.? I think he meant 3.way chess. And all chess players know that it is not wise to put your strongest piece in the line of fire.

    ..And the racino industry is not the true casino industry – there might not ever be a true level playing field involving parimutuels and resort casinos. I do believe it is time for the horses and dogs to retire in florida.

    Florida is in a true bind. Bring Chain.Gang Charlie back. The Seminoles love that SOB to death. That man was truly instrumental in producing a deal with the Seminoles. And not Galvano. What did Galvano do anyway.? Just take everybodies money and just say ‘Ok, we’ll push this bill.’ .?! Its not a bill for the people, I’ll tell you that much.

    Only a small handfull of people benefit from SB 8. Not florida. Surely not the Seminoles who were awarded exclusivity free from outside competition. Florida must appease the Seminoles first. SB 8 does none of that. Another year another bill dead in the water.

    Judge Hinkle makes his ruling. Florida appeals and will lose again. Spending all of Florida’s taxpayers money and Florida residents are none the wiser about footing the bill. LoL. The Florida Senate ought to be ensuring the lives of Floridians instead of letting lake Okeechobee die. Floridians suffer from the senates lack of empathy. Florida could be beautiful. Florida could be home.

    As it stands, the compact grants the Seminoles exclusivity until 2030. Who doesn’t understand that.?

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704