Supreme Court orders oral argument in old rock ‘n’ roll lawsuit
Original members of The Turtles are seeking copyright protection for their music, popular in the ’60s.

640px-The_Turtles

The state’s highest court set oral argument in what could be a landmark case regarding who pays whom to play old rock ‘n’ roll.

The Florida Supreme Court on Monday said it will hear argument April 6 in a case pitting Flo & Eddie, two original members of the 1960s band “The Turtles,” against satellite radio operator Sirius XM. Their most famous hit is “Happy Together.”

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year had certified questions of state law to the state Supreme Court in a yearslong class-action suit.

The action came after Sirius XM stopped paying artists to play their music recorded before 1972. Federal copyright protection is only available for recordings made after Feb. 15, 1972, while sound recordings made before then are covered by a hodgepodge of state and common law.

The stakes could be huge.

If Flo & Eddie win, Sirius XM, the internet music service Pandora, and others “would owe damages not only to (them), but potentially all other owners of pre-1972 sound recordings … includ(ing) every recording ever made by The Beatles, The Doors, Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin, not to mention Glenn Miller and Tommy Dorsey,” according to a 2014 blog post by Nova Southeastern University copyright officer Stephen Carlisle.

Media companies and other concerns have filed “friend of the court” papers, including iHeartMedia, PandoraElectronic Frontier FoundationNational Association Of Broadcasters, as well as the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Section of the Florida Bar and a group of copyright and intellectual property law professors.

But it would be a come-from-behind win for Flo & Eddie, at least in Florida. A federal judge already has sided with Sirius XM and granted a summary judgment in favor of the company, which Flo & Eddie appealed. They also filed suit in California and New York.

One question the court was asked to consider: Does widespread popularity and playing of a piece of music cancel out copyright claims in that music?

“Happy Together” has been posted multiple times on YouTube, for example, with one post currently logging 10.7 million views.

Advertisement

 

 

Jim Rosica

Jim Rosica is the Tallahassee-based Senior Editor for Florida Politics. He previously was the Tampa Tribune’s statehouse reporter. Before that, he covered three legislative sessions in Florida for The Associated Press. Jim graduated from law school in 2009 after spending nearly a decade covering courts for the Tallahassee Democrat, including reporting on the 2000 presidential recount. He can be reached at [email protected]



#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Daniel Figueroa, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Joe Henderson, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Mike Wright, and Tristan Wood.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories