Constitutional review panel’s ‘style’ committee wraps up work


Barring any last minute turbulence, get ready for a long ballot in November.

The Constitution Revision Commission’s Style and Drafting Committee on Thursday OK’d 12 proposed amendments to the state’s governing document. (A meeting packet for Thursday is here.)

They would be in addition to five amendments, either from the Legislature or citizen initiatives, already set for the November statewide ballot.

The committee’s work now goes to the full CRC for consideration. It’s slated to meet again starting April 16.

Each amendment must receive a minimum of 22 votes from the 37-member panel. From there, approved amendments go directly to voters. CRC members can also try to further amend proposals on the floor, but that also requires 22 votes.  

Amendments the commission will review include a crime victims’ bill of rights, an ethics package that would extend the state’s lobbying ban on former elected officials from two to six years, and bans on indoor ‘vaping,’ offshore drilling, and greyhound racing.

Ballot titles can be no longer than 15 words, and summaries can’t go past 75 words. Courts have held both must not mislead voters.

The five amendments already slated for November include proposals to expand the homestead-exemption property tax break and limit property tax assessments, restore voting rights to former felons, give voters final authority in deciding whether to expand casino-style gambling, and require a supermajority vote of lawmakers to raise state taxes and fees.

The commission must finish its work by May 10 and turn in a report to Secretary of State Ken DetznerThe panel is formed every 20 years to review and suggest changes to the state constitution. 


Background provided by The News Service of Florida. 

Jim Rosica

Jim Rosica is the Tallahassee-based Senior Editor for Florida Politics. He previously was the Tampa Tribune’s statehouse reporter. Before that, he covered three legislative sessions in Florida for The Associated Press. Jim graduated from law school in 2009 after spending nearly a decade covering courts for the Tallahassee Democrat, including reporting on the 2000 presidential recount. He can be reached at [email protected]


  • Larry Gillis (Cape Coral)

    April 5, 2018 at 1:47 pm

    Commissioner Martinez’ “Proposal 6” will NOT allow judges to defer to bureaucratic interpretations of laws (and rules). It will require them to act like real judges and to do their own interpreting of laws (and rules). It is a commentary on the present sad state of affairs when the Florida judiciary has to be told to act like judges. However, so be it.

    Get out your gavels, Your Honors, and have at it: stuff the bureaucrats back into their cubicles.

  • Steve Hough

    April 5, 2018 at 11:56 pm

    Jesus. I can’t wait. The only proposal that should have been forwarded to the ballot is P 62. Other than that, I have to agree with Major Harding. Read ’em and weep. Such is politics in this day and age. 🙁

  • Mark Taynton

    April 6, 2018 at 12:47 pm

    This panel is a farce. It was to review suggestions from the public. Someone needs to take a look at how many came in from the public and how many actually made it to the list. Almost all we’re written and suggested by the panel itself. This doesn’t sound like representing the public to me.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, Wes Wolfe, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn