House panel clears ‘guardrail’ bill for felon voting rights restoration

The bill defines who can decide if fines, fees, and restitution have been paid.

A bill to define when felons have completed their sentences and are able to vote again was OK’d Tuesday in the Florida House Criminal Justice Subcommittee.

The vote, however, came against a backdrop of strong criticism that it goes too far in detailing when sentences are complete.

Chairman Jamie Grant, a Tampa Republican, argued passionately – and indignantly – that criticism wrongly characterized the measure (PCB CRJ 19-03) as a Republican attempt to clamp down on the voting rights of felons.

He lashed out at testimony by proponents of what’s known as Amendment 4, the state constitutional change approved by nearly 65 percent of statewide voters in November.

Grant said critics misstated the bill’s intentions, which he said were only to assure that constitutional requirements are met.

His arguments came after a series of speakers representing the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition and others charged that the bill places decisions in the hands of non-judicial officials to determine whether felons meet all the financial obligations of sentences — including fines, fees, and restitution, and any interest charged.

Neil Volz, political diretor for Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, said there already is a process in place being used by county supervisors of elections and the Florida Division of Elections to determine completions of sentences, and that has led to many returning citizens to register to vote, including many voting Tuesday in Jacksonville’s municipal elections. He chharged that the bill would change that process, and likely restrict the abilities of thousands of people to vote.

“There is a current process. whatever anybody thinks of that process, it exists. and that process does not include the same things as relates to completion of sentence that are being debated now,” Volz said.

In the end, the debate came down to concerns raised by Democratic state Rep. James Bush III of Miami and Grant over whether the amendment should be “self-enacting,” putting the burden on the state to prove if felons are not qualified to vote.

Grant and others believe it’s unclear who is qualified to vote, and lawmakers are obliged to clear things up so that courts and agencies don’t have to make judgment calls.

Bush made a long, impassioned argument that civil rights, particularly voting rights, had long been offended by attempts to limit voters, particularly African-American voters, from voting.

Anything in the bill that further restricts those rights contributes to that history, he added.

Requiring non-judicial officers to determine if financial obligations have been met, including some that could be imposed by prisons after sentencing, places financial burdens akin to the poll taxes used in the segregation era, Bush said.

“We have a dark history but we can clean that up,” he told fellow House members. “Let’s do the right thing by the voters. The voters have already spoken.”

Grant disagreed that fines, fees and restitution could be compared with poll taxes, however.

He insisted that language in the bill that would give discretion to the Department of Corrections and others to determine if financial obligations have been met should make it easier – not harder – for felons to fulfill all their sentencing requirements.

“I believe in redemption. I believe in second chances. I believe in restoration,” Grant said.

Afterward, the League of Women Voters of Florida and the ACLU of Florida released statements that the bill “undermines” Amendment 4, urging the Legislature to reject it.

The bill “is an affront to Florida voters who approved Amendment 4,” Kirk Bailey, political director of the ACLU of Florida, said in a written statement. “If this bill passes, it will undoubtedly continue to disenfranchise those who have already served their time and paid their debt to society.

“This is exactly what we were worried about from the beginning – legislative attempts to undermine the will of the people who voted for second chances and to rid Florida of the last vestiges of its Jim Crow era past.

“This bill will broaden the narrow exclusions for murder and sexual felony offenses in the amendment, and broaden what was contemplated by completion of one’s sentence to include all sorts of court fees and supervision costs unrelated to one’s sentence. This will inevitably prevent individuals from voting based on the size of one’s bank account.”

And League of Women Voters of Florida President Patricia Brigham rejected what she characterized as Grant’s “trust us” approach.

“The reality is that the Florida Legislature has earned a reputation of spending millions of taxpayer dollars in defense of indefensible noncompliance with the intent of voter initiatives through the years,” she stated.

Scott Powers

Scott Powers is an Orlando-based political journalist with 30+ years’ experience, mostly at newspapers such as the Orlando Sentinel and the Columbus Dispatch. He covers local, state and federal politics and space news across much of Central Florida. His career earned numerous journalism awards for stories ranging from the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster to presidential elections to misplaced nuclear waste. He and his wife Connie have three grown children. Besides them, he’s into mystery and suspense books and movies, rock, blues, basketball, baseball, writing unpublished novels, and being amused. Email him at [email protected].


  • OleHippieChick

    March 19, 2019 at 3:15 pm

    Gov. DeSantis scrambled to get with the FL Lege to tamp down Amendment 4. This typically Republican move is nothing more than Jim Crow 2.0.
    Shame on them. Let people vote.
    “There is a current process … it exists.”

    • OleHippieChick

      March 19, 2019 at 3:37 pm

      ATTENTION @GovRonDeSantis, who’s JimCrowing #FLAmendment4:
      US Constitution
      Amendment XV Section 1
      The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

  • Lester W Bowen

    March 19, 2019 at 11:46 pm

    First of all, this was a poorly written and deceptive amendment. There was no mention of the fact that there was already a good system in place for rehabilitated felons to get their voting rights back. All they had to do, was show that they were no longer criminals. If they had truly changed their ways, no problem. No one in Florida wants criminals electing the lawmakers. Secondly, and most importantly, they have to pay all the penalties of their crimes before they can have voting rights restored. Is this not common sense? It is the least they can do!

  • Sue Lynney

    March 20, 2019 at 9:30 am

    The plain language of Amendment 4 says what needs to be completed before voting rights are restored. In addition to release from prison, parole and probation need to be completed. Nowhere does it mention financial obligations.

    In addition, to require anyone to pay fees, etc., before voting amounts to an unconstitutional poll tax under the 24th Amendment to the US Constitution. Further, SCOTUS just last month declared that excessive civil forfeitures violate the 8th Amendment. Any erroneous argument that the lawyers arguing on behalf of the amendment in the FL Supreme Court made cannot waive the constitutional rights of 1.6 million currently eligible returning citizens and the 7,000 new ones who will be released from Florida prisons every year.

  • Brian E Roche

    March 20, 2019 at 12:53 pm

    The Criminally Operated Flori-Duh legislature, CORRUPT IN EVERY WAY, controlled by Republicans, has routinely done everything possible to COMPLETELY IGNORE THE RESULTS OF CITIZENS INITIATIVES, AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORI-DUH CONSTITUTION, etc…

    Time after time, the citizens Vote, the Flori-Duh legislature “loses” an argument with the Greater Majority of Citizens and does everything in their power to DENY the Voters their rights…

    ALL this is, is another thinly veiled attempt to keep ANY and ALL that MIGHT vote Opposite to THEIR Interests…in Most Cases meaning, Democrats, from spoiling their party…

    The Flori-Duh legislature…the lamest political body that Money can Buy…

    Screw Jamie Grant…didn’t they let him get away with Stealing – Mis-appropriating 2 Million Dollars of State Monies just a few years ago…

    And HE’S incensed…

  • Daniel Woodard

    March 29, 2019 at 9:38 pm

    In Florida Judges are not paid by the taxpayers. Instead they are told to shake down everyone who passes through the judicial system. Since most prisoners have no money, judges have little choice but to set the fees high or go hungry. Obviously poor people can never pay the fees and are left in debt for life. The Republicans want to mke sure they are disenfranchised for life as well. If they won’t vote for us, why should we let them vote at all?

    We need a new statue of Justice, with one hand holding the scales and the other reaching into the prisoner’s pocket.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704