Proposed reform could cut prison costs by $860M over five years

Florida prison 2
It's moving through the Senate but doesn't yet have traction in the House.

State economists are estimating that a proposed decrease in the percent of a prison sentence that must be served could potentially result in $860.4 million in savings over the next five years.

The Office of Economic and Demographic Research on Monday reviewed the impacts of several criminal justice changes moving through the Legislature. The panel determined that a plan to decrease the mandatory time-served threshold for certain offenders would result in the most significant drop in prison beds when compared to other proposed statute changes.

That adjustment to what’s known as “gain time” is embedded in the Florida First Step Act (SB 642), the Senate’s criminal justice overhaul.

Specifically, the provision would lower the time-served threshold from 85 percent to 65 percent for certain first-time, non-violent offenders. Prisoners are currently required to serve at least 85 percent of their sentences.

If the change became law, the panel figured that the Department of Corrections (DOC) would need almost 7,600 fewer beds during the next fiscal year, resulting in about $74 million in immediate savings. Over the next few years, DOC could shave off the need for roughly 1,600 more beds and would save more and more each year, resulting in $860.4 million in total savings through 2024.

Sen. Jeff Brandes, the sponsor of the Florida First Step Act, said the change would allow lawmakers to beef up other parts of a constrained justice budget — spending more on law enforcement, guards, re-entry services and educators inside prisons.

“We think those would be radically better investments,” Brandes said. 

Brandes anticipated that the gain-time change would mainly apply to a subset of prisoners who are not serving long sentences.

“For the most part, we’re talking about a few months for most inmates,” Brandes said. “Instead of serving six more months, they might serve two — and those extra four months have zero correlation with reduced crime.”

Greg Newburn, policy director for FAMM — a national criminal justice advocacy group — suggested that spending more on other parts of the budget would be a better investment in public safety.

“I certainly would be hard-pressed to believe that incarcerating this pool of people for that additional amount of time is the very best way we can spend $860 million over the next five years,” Newburn said.

The gain-time change is not included in the House’s criminal justice reform bill (HB 7125), which, like the Florida First Step Act, is ready for floor consideration.

But Brandes, who has said the two chambers are negotiating on the reforms, pointed to a recent court ruling as something that could increase the House’s appetite for changes that would immediately reduce prison costs.

The News Service of Florida reported last week that a federal judge ruled DOC must treat all inmates who have a hepatitis C infection.

That could cost the state an additional $20 million next year and would likely be factored into upcoming budget talks, Brandes said.

“We’re treading water in this year’s budget without this 85 to 65 percent move,” Brandes said.

Danny McAuliffe

Danny McAuliffe is a Tallahassee correspondent for Florida Politics. He is a graduate of Florida State University, where he served as the editor of the FSView & Florida Flambeau. He is a lifelong Floridian and indulges in swimming, hiking, running and memes when the news cycle permits. Reach him at [email protected]


4 comments

  • Michael

    April 23, 2019 at 8:23 am

    Business as usual. The Florida Senate takes bold and positive steps to address serious chronic issues in Florida’s corrections system, while the House does virtually nothing. Let’s hope the House sees the light this session.

  • michelle hill

    April 23, 2019 at 11:04 am

    The house needs to vote yes to 642 and release those inmates. The people voted yes to amendment 11 on 2018 ballots for retroactive the 642 has the retroactive in it for the inmates for the laws that have already been changed their serving time under the old laws

  • J.J

    April 23, 2019 at 10:23 pm

    I would like to see how those prison cost savings were figured

    The summary is meaningless without explaining the methodology. Like show your worksheet when you take a math test.

    The cost savings look.way too low to me, and should have included the extra prison cost savings if it was 65% for all non-life prisoners

  • J.J

    April 23, 2019 at 10:25 pm

    I would like to see how those prison cost savings were figured

    The summary is meaningless without explaining the methodology. Like show your worksheet when you take a math test.

    The cost savings look.way too low to me, and should have included the extra prison cost savings if it was 65% for all non-life prisoners

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Daniel Figueroa, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Joe Henderson, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Mike Wright, and Tristan Wood.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories