Clay County Superintendent of Schools race the latest example of how write-in candidates can wreak havoc

They can't win, but they can spoil.

The argument over whether a write-in candidate should force a closed primary is nothing new.

In races where all of the candidates belong to a single party, the primary opens, meaning both major parties, no party-affiliated voters and third party voters can all vote in the primary. But when a write-in candidate qualifies, it closes the primary.

That’s what’s happening in Clay County where Tyler Groves filed as a write-in for Superintendent of Schools.

His entrance into the race is a particularly egregious example of how plopping a write-in candidate into a race robs a solid portion of the voting populous from participating in the democratic process.

For the uninitiated, here’s why that’s a problem.

In this case, all of the candidates, including Groves, are Republicans. Because of Groves, only Republicans will vote in the primary, sending their nominee to the general to run against Groves.

Yes, Democratic voters can cast a ballot in November, but they get virtually no say in who takes the office because write-in candidates are never, and I’m OK with saying never here, successful. The winner of the primary will win the general.

With nearly 84,000 Republicans, Clay County is overwhelmingly conservative. But there are still nearly 36,000 Democrats and 35,000 independents, as well as nearly 2,000 third party voters, all of whom will disenfranchised.

And for what?

Groves entered the race June 12, the final day to qualify for the race. Entering in the 11th hour isn’t necessarily a sign of a candidate’s viability, but that’s not the only red flag that this is a repulsive example of wresting civil rights from nearly half of the county’s voters.

Groves, get this, not only doesn’t live in the county, he lists his address as a vacant lot in Starke, the next county over in Bradford.

It doesn’t appear Groves has ever lived in the district.

So not only is he robbing the vote from some 72,000 voters, he’s running for countywide office in a county where he doesn’t pay taxes or have any other ties to the community.

He graduated from Bradford High School in 2016, the next county over.

The four Republican candidates in the race, the ones who are seriously running and who actually live in the district, should call on Groves to withdraw from the race in order to let democracy work for all, not just the county’s Republicans.

And Groves, if he has any interest in seriously seeking elected office in the future, should heed that call. If he ever wages a credible campaign, any campaign consultant worth their weight in salt would surely look back at this assault on voting rights and use it against him.

Peter Schorsch

Peter Schorsch is the President of Extensive Enterprises and is the publisher of some of Florida’s most influential new media websites, including Florida Politics and Sunburn, the morning read of what’s hot in Florida politics. Schorsch is also the publisher of INFLUENCE Magazine. For several years, Peter's blog was ranked by the Washington Post as the best state-based blog in Florida. In addition to his publishing efforts, Peter is a political consultant to several of the state’s largest governmental affairs and public relations firms. Peter lives in St. Petersburg with his wife, Michelle, and their daughter, Ella.


5 comments

  • William

    June 22, 2020 at 3:55 pm

    In my opinion, the primary should be paid for by the political parties. The primary is supposed to be when the party chooses its candidate. Therefore, independents and members of other parties should not be allowed to vote in a primary for another party. The taxpayers should NOT be paying for a primary. We should bill the political parties for the primary, or move to a caucus style primary where the party chooses its candidate to run in the general election. Republicans select their Republican candidate, Democrats select their Democrat candidate and so forth. All independents can run in the general but only the candidate selected, or elected, by the party can make the general election. If a party chooses not to put forth a candidate, then that is its choice.

  • David D.

    June 23, 2020 at 10:41 am

    Can someone please explain to me why party affiliation is even a FACTOR in non-legislative offices? Why do the candidates for Sheriff, Tax Collector, and yes, Superintendent of Schools need to identify themselves as Republicans – other than to say, in Clay County, “Don’t worry, you can trust me – I’m not a damn Democrat”? Seriously – why does party affiliation MATTER in positions like these?

  • Harold Finch

    June 23, 2020 at 10:54 am

    Watch out for Charlie VanZant and his unscrupulous Father, Charles who intentionally defrauded the county claiming a false Homestead exemption, and will do anything to get his son elected. VanZant is a dictator and is unqualified to be Superintendent.

    • Mike In Clay County

      June 23, 2020 at 3:45 pm

      We need open primaries before the country runs completely off the rails. Closed primaries only benefit the extremes and obviously the extremes can’t seem to do anything together.

    • Bnkie

      June 23, 2020 at 5:01 pm

      I agree

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, William March, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Jesse Scheckner, Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704