House committee advances school choice measure
Image via AP.

800 (5)
Rep. Randy Fine described the proposal as more 'voucher-driven.'

A House panel advanced a proposed committee bill Wednesday that would fundamentally restructure Florida’s school voucher programs.

The House bill differs dramatically from the Senate companion (SB 48), which cleared its final committee stop earlier this month.

Presented by Republican Rep. Randy Fine of Palm Bay, the House Education and Employment Committee OK’d the bill (PCB EEC 21-01) with an 18-3 vote.

The bill advanced without debate.

The PCB would repeal the Gardiner Scholarship Program and McKay Scholarship Program and transition participating students with special needs to the Family Empowerment Scholarship Program.

Alternatively, the Senate version aims to consolidate the programs under the McKay-Gardiner banner.

“I think the idea is to reduce complexity,” Fine told reporters after the meeting. “We’ve got multiple scholarships that do the same thing. (Creating) a single umbrella with (a) single entry point makes it easier for parents.”

The bill would also increase voucher amounts from 95% to 100% for students in the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program, Family Empowerment Scholarship and Hope Scholarship Program.

The Senate version, meanwhile, limited education savings accounts to 97.5%.

Unlike the Senate bill, which aimed to extend education savings accounts to all students, the House measure would limit those accounts to students with special needs. The accounts could be used for various, yet restricted costs such as tuition, fees and digital devices, according to the bill

The scholarship vouchers for students with disabilities, meanwhile, could be used for tuition, fees and transportation.

Additionally, the proposal would mandate tax credit scholarship audits from once a year to at least once every three years.

Notably, Fine’s bill has an indeterminate fiscal impact. When asked, he said making such a determination is impossible.

“The reason the cost is indeterminate is we don’t know how many parents are going to choose to avail themselves to these options,” Fine said.

Fine expects the proposal to make one more committee stop before reaching the House floor. But before then, he and the Senate sponsor, Republican Sen. Manny Diaz, will work to iron out differences.

“They’re ongoing discussions,” Fine said. “I think both sides want the same thing: more choices for more parents. But sometimes how you get there is a little different, so we’re having those discussions right now.”

If signed into law, the proposal would take effect July 1.

Jason Delgado

Jason Delgado covers news out of the state capital for Florida Politics. After a stint with the U.S. Army, Jason attended the University of Central Florida where he studied American Policy and National Security. His past bylines include WMFE-NPR and POLITICO Florida. Throw him a line at [email protected] or on Twitter at @JasonDelgadoFL.


One comment

  • Sonja Fitch

    March 24, 2021 at 4:48 pm

    Indeterminate funding cost?! Wtf. Your proposal is to take away from the common good for a select few. This select few ain’t select. This select few want tax dollars for “church” schools ! No more vouchers! Vote Democrat up and down ballot for the elections in 2022!

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Drew Dixon, Renzo Downey, Rick Flagg, A.G. Gancarski, Joe Henderson, Janelle Irwin, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Scott Powers, Andrew Wilson, and Kelly Hayes.

Email: [email protected]
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704