Federal judge shoots down request to block Medicaid ban on gender-affirming care

Transgender pride rainbow waving flag. Seamless cgi animation highly detailed fabric texture in cinematic slow motion. LGBTQ 3d background of fight for rights and equality symbol.
Judge Robert Hinkle said he will rely on state Medicaid law, not federal law, to determine the legality of the rule.

A federal judge has let stand Florida’s move to prevent Medicaid from reimbursing for gender-affirming care, noting that he wasn’t presented with any medical evidence showing four beneficiaries would experience irreparable harm if the prohibition were to continue.

In denying the request for a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said he will consider the legality of the rule based on Medicaid statutes and not federal equal protection issues, as attorneys for Lambda Legal and Transgender Rights Initiative at the Southern Legal Counsel had hoped.

That means Hinkle will be taking a closer look, he said, at “whether the state reasonably determined that the treatments at issue are experimental” or whether there was some “preordained” outcome that the Gov. Ron DeSantis administration decided in advance of the analysis.

While he ruled from the bench, Hinkle said the written ruling will reiterate a position that attorneys defending the state of Florida testified to on Wednesday: that the Medicaid ban on reimbursement isn’t a blanket prohibition, and that beneficiaries can request a variance to the rule.

The variance would allow an administrative judge to review cases individually and determine whether the care is appropriate, said attorney Mohammad Omar Jazil, who represents the state Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA).

Hinkle’s decision could be appealed. But at press time It was not clear whether attorneys for Lambda Legal, a national organization that represents LGBTQ+ people in civil rights cases, or the Transgender Rights Initiative at the Southern Legal Counsel planned to do so.

A spokesperson for AHCA, the department where Medicaid is housed, said Hinkle’s decision was on point.

“The Agency agrees with the court’s decision today and remains committed to ensuring Florida Medicaid only covers treatments that are deemed safe and effective,” Communications Director Brock Juarez said in a prepared statement. “We continue to stand by our evidence-based (generally accepted professional medical standards) report and thorough rule-making process.”

Medicaid Director Tom Wallace earlier this summer released what he called a thorough report of assessments of the benefits of gender affirming care and subsequently deemed gender-affirming care as experimental. The label precludes Medicaid from reimbursing for health care because the state’s safety net program doesn’t provide coverage for experimental treatments.

AHCA conducted the analysis after state Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo recommended against providing gender-affirming care, including social transitioning, to children.

In reaching his recommendations, Ladapo reviewed the same five assessments that AHCA reviewed.

The recommendations are at odds with the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, among other medical organizations that support the provision of the services.

In addition to releasing the analysis, the state held a public meeting in Tallahassee on the proposed changes to the Medicaid rule. The meeting drew a crowd of residents from across the state, many of whom supported the proposal and booed or chanted “lock them up” when people testified against the ban.

Hinkle said people on both sides of the issue have “agendas.” The judge expressed concerns that not all people may be receiving appropriate health care and that there are times that the care gets “botched.”

But Hinkle also noted that the opinions of the five experts Ladapo and Wallace relied on in reaching their conclusions on gender-affirming care for those who suffer from gender dysphoria are “decidedly out of mainstream.”

“Somebody is organizing this,” Hinkle said.

Florida is one of at least 10 states that partially blocks gender-affirming care for people who suffer from gender dysphoria.

AHCA provided data to Florida Politics that shows very few Medicaid beneficiaries in Florida have received gender-affirming care.

Twelve children and 13 adults underwent surgical procedures between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 that were reimbursed by Medicaid. The most common procedure for both groups was a simple mastectomy, with three children and six adults having undergone the procedure sometime over the 12-month period.

In all, 15 gender-affirming surgical procedures were performed on the 12 children and 19 were performed on adults during the time span. Children are defined as beneficiaries under 21 years of age, which means the child category includes procedures performed on adult patients who are 18, 19 or 20 years old.

Florida Medicaid does not provide any benefits to children without their parent’s consent.

Christine Jordan Sexton

Tallahassee-based health care reporter who focuses on health care policy and the politics behind it. Medicaid, health insurance, workers’ compensation, and business and professional regulation are just a few of the things that keep me busy.


9 comments

  • David in Shoreline

    October 12, 2022 at 6:47 pm

    Great ruling from the judge. In a few more years “gender affirming care” will be in the same category of quack medical treatments such as lobotomies and bloodletting.

    • Terra

      October 14, 2022 at 12:15 pm

      The alternative before gender affirming care was literally lobotomies done to real queer people. You are so plainly out of your depth and historical knowledge here. GAC has saved lives and allowed people to live fulfilled.

  • The Real Tom

    October 12, 2022 at 7:21 pm

    I got my surgery done in Atlanta. Couldn’t be happier with the results. As for these religious apes and rednecks in Florida…they can rot in hell. Bunch of animals.

    • Come again ian

      October 15, 2022 at 5:14 am

      Ian was the best thing to happen to Florida.
      Hope they get five more of them next year.

  • Yrral

    October 13, 2022 at 1:17 am

    What parties do not have agendas,judge making medical decisions

  • Terra

    October 14, 2022 at 12:12 pm

    Absolutely backwards. The AMA, AAP, APA, and NSAW all advocate gender affirming care based on a vast vast body of research and personal accounts and real world satisfaction. Even most universities back gender affirming care and accomodations. The alternative is the risk of suicide for trans and gender diverse people skyrocketing.

  • Leslie smug

    October 14, 2022 at 12:27 pm

    They’re not making medical decisions. They’re making decisions that decide who’s paying for it. If you can’t get your own medical policy to cover it then your not going to foist your medical costs on the taxpayers…go do your go fund me and hustle the money off of your wealthy lgbtq community.. oh they don’t want to pay for it??? Oh well I guess they don’t support it then either…this will get. Interesting. I did my sociology research on transgender reassignment back in 82 so in certain cases it’s bonafide but it’s on its way to being abused and guess what happens when a candidate realizes they’ve made a mistake? You’ve got a suicide on your hands…saw alot of that in Miami in the 70s. Oops I didn’t really want my balls cut off…to late they’re gone.

  • Leslie smug

    October 14, 2022 at 1:03 pm

    They’re not making medical decisions. They’re making decisions that decide who’s paying for it. If you can’t get your own medical policy to cover it then your not going to foist your medical costs on the taxpayers…go do your go fund me and hustle the money off of your wealthy lgbtq community.. oh they don’t want to pay for it??? Oh well I guess they don’t support it then either…and guess what happens when a candidate realizes they’ve made a mistake? You’ve got a suicide on your hands…saw alot of that in Miami in the 70s. Oops I didn’t really want my balls cut off…to late they’re gone.

  • Jerry

    October 16, 2022 at 9:19 pm

    If you want to chop your bits off…go right on ahead, as long as you are an adult, I don’t care what you do to your body.

    But don’t push that cost of what is a 100% elective surgery on to the backs of tax payers. This country and this state is already in a ton of debt.

Comments are closed.


#FlaPol

Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Roseanne Dunkelberger, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Kelly Hayes, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Gray Rohrer, Jesse Scheckner, Christine Sexton, Andrew Wilson, Wes Wolfe, and Mike Wright.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704




Sign up for Sunburn


Categories