
I tried my best to stay quiet.
Like many in the political world these past few weeks, I’ve watched these Special Elections in Florida’s 1st and 6th Congressional Districts unfold with a growing sense of frustration. I wanted to give the benefit of the doubt, to trust that the strategy made sense, that there was a bigger picture I wasn’t seeing.
But as we approach the final days of these races, it’s clear we have been lying to ourselves. And the cost of that delusion is too high to ignore.
Nearly $20 million has been spent on these two races, districts that Donald Trump won by overwhelming margins.
As of this writing, CD 1 shows a 19-point Republican turnout advantage and CD 6 has a 9-point GOP edge. These are not swing districts. These are not close races. And yet, every day, I see the same ads flooding social media: “We can win this. Donate now. We’re closing the gap.” When in fact, the gap is widening, not closing.
Let’s be clear: these races were never truly winnable. That’s not defeatism. That’s math. Now, I understand that this $20 million wouldn’t have been raised if not for these races. The candidates, the urgency, the fear, they all generated energy, and in turn, money.
But that’s exactly the problem.
We’re fueling a system that prioritizes emotional appeal over strategic outcomes. And while small-dollar donors give in good faith, believing their contribution might flip a seat, the only people consistently benefiting are the consultants cashing the checks.
This isn’t just poor planning. It’s donor abuse. It’s an unethical use of resources in a state that desperately needs long-term investment. Even the state party and the DNC, institutions that typically bring oversight and structure to competitive races, got swept up in the momentum.
I don’t know what internal conversations may have happened, but from the outside, it looked like no one stepped in to apply the kind of rigor or accountability we expect in viable races. And that’s not a criticism of leadership; it’s simply a hard truth about what happens when hope and hype go unchecked.
Imagine what we could have done with that $20 million. We could have launched the largest voter registration program Florida has ever seen. We could have hired and trained organizers in underserved communities. We could have built lasting infrastructure that would benefit not just one race, but every race to come.
Instead, we burned through donor dollars on campaigns that will leave nothing behind: no new voters, no stronger party infrastructure, no sustained momentum. Just grifters with a payday and a movement no stronger than it was before.
Let me be clear: I’m not accusing anyone of criminal conduct. But just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s right. And just because a campaign exists doesn’t mean it should be used as a fundraising funnel for consultants and vendors with no long-term plan for the communities they claim to serve.
I understand the desire to fight everywhere. I understand the symbolism. But if we want to win, really win, we have to stop confusing activity with strategy. We have to be honest about what’s winnable, what’s worth building, and what actually helps us take back power.
We need to stop mistaking good intentions for good planning, and we need to stop letting consultants write checks with other people’s hope. As a consultant, I know I’m part of this system. And that’s exactly why I’m speaking up.
We should expect better from each other and demand more from the institutions and professionals who claim to fight for democracy. The party deserves better. Our donors deserve better. Our voters deserve better. And so do the candidates we recruit, people who give up their time with their families, careers, and so much more to step into the arena and run.
If we’re serious about building a real, sustainable movement in Florida or anywhere else, we have to stop chasing quick wins and start investing in lasting infrastructure.
This isn’t about giving up the fight. It’s about fighting smarter, with integrity, purpose, and accountability. We all love to say, “The stakes are too high.” Well, if that’s true, then the excuses have to stop. It’s time to act like it.
___
Chris Mitchell is a managing partner for Statecraft Digital.
6 comments
EARL PITTS AMERICAN
March 30, 2025 at 1:16 pm
Relax your Sphincter, Chris,
One Leftist, such as yourself, should not attempt to sholder the “Total Cluster Fucque” that was the 0Biden Sadministration.
Your party of choice, “The Dook 4 Brains Leftys”, will most likely come back to power sometime in your “Senior Years” provided you are not already older than 30.
So again my “Lefty” Relax Your Sphincter”,
EARL PITTS AMERICAN
Writing this days before an election which has energized real people is outrageous
March 30, 2025 at 2:57 pm
The author doesn’t get that $20 million isn’t available to the party apparatus, which is highly distrusted. The article shows why that distrust is well deserved. With “leadership” like this Ds will be irrelevant indefinitely here in Florida.
positive mike
March 30, 2025 at 5:12 pm
It would have been more appropriate to have written this a year ago, or after this upcoming election. Doing it a few days before an election that has galvanized some Democrats makes you appear to be an enemy of the Democrats.
Bill
March 30, 2025 at 6:02 pm
You’re spot on….huge amounts of these monies have gone to consultants….nothing trickles down to the Democratic County organizations that are doing a lot of the work knocking on doors, sending text messages holding community rallies.
We could have done a lot with $20 million.
Peachy
March 30, 2025 at 6:56 pm
I thought most of the money went to Oprah Winfrey. Girl has a company to run after all.
Bill R
March 31, 2025 at 9:13 am
Good argument, but the problem is that it’s these special elections that get the attention. Building everyday party infrastructure doesn’t. What we need is for these candidates who raise all this money to then turn it over to the party to build the kind of infrastructure that he (and I) think is needed. But they probably won’t do that.